During the offseason and preseason, many felt the reason not to go after Turner was that we weren't close, that one player wouldn't make much of a difference, needed all of our picks for depth, etc.
Well, now that we're 5-1, and certainly looking like a playoff team, does that change the landscape? It should be obvious to management at the Pack that the RB's we have are not the answer. Sure Wynn has shown some flashes, but he's not going to be this year's Drew-Jones. So does the idea of giving up a couple of picks (likely a 1st and 2nd) for Turner have more appeal now?
Inquiring minds want to know
Well, now that we're 5-1, and certainly looking like a playoff team, does that change the landscape? It should be obvious to management at the Pack that the RB's we have are not the answer. Sure Wynn has shown some flashes, but he's not going to be this year's Drew-Jones. So does the idea of giving up a couple of picks (likely a 1st and 2nd) for Turner have more appeal now?
Inquiring minds want to know




Comment