The Golf Channel makes a profit?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
JS-Cowboy Owner Pulls for NFL Network
Collapse
X
-
Unfortunately for people like me, Charter is the only real high speed internet provider in our area. So I get by with a cheaper internet and cable with a years old bundle that they don't offer anymore. I pay something lik $85 a month for both. If I switch to Dish, I save a lot on the TV end but then I have to subscribe to a $60 high speed internet. Sure, some can get it for something like $20 for 6 months but I am not a "new" customer. So I will end up shelling out even more. I would love nothing more then to dump Charter all together. AT&T offers DSL in my area but I am on the farthest end of their coverage and I cannot get a connection as fast as the lowest speed Charter offers.
Wisconsin is looking to pass legislation that would allow competition across the state. It passed the Senate yesterday and now has to clear the Legislature. Until that passes and until a company thinks our area is worthy of competition, I am afraid I am SOL. If AT&T can provide "consistent" 1.5 Mbps to my area instead of the normal 768 Kbps that my parents down the block get, I am religated to Charter's 3 Mbps, which to me isn't much different in performance 1.5 Mbps. We have wireless networks available but those are even worse at providing a consistent bandwidth. My parents and I are in the same area and I am 2 blocks farther down then them so my service may be spotty at even 768 Kbps. With a dedicated, consistent 1.5 Mbps DSL, you get better performance then with Charter's 3 Mbps service because it isn't a shared connection with other's in your area."Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
"The most popular sport" part is why. It's why ABC doesn't have Monday night football. ESPN paid a bazillion dollars for the rights and they're STILL making money.Originally posted by rdanomlyWhat I don't get is how the freaking Golf Channel is on my non-fancy cable, but the most popular sport in the nation's dedicated channel isn't.
As the media landscape changes and the world's youngsters take over people are going to have to pay for their entertainment--and I don't mean by watching Gillete commercials Grandpa.
ATT came to my door, and at my age I've been ripped off by so many people I usually kick everybody out without even hearing their pitch. But they waved the NFL network and the Big Ten network, high speed internet, and a Digital recorder for 85 bucks a month in front of my nose.
Goodbye Charter. You've been outmarketed by the phone company.
I might regret it later, but I'll let you know if I do.[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
ABC and ESPN are owned by the same parent company, Disney. NBC is the company that paid a bazillion for SNF, so they wouldn't be locked out of the FB market. Shows like Desperate Housewives do better than MNF - or at least the combination of MNF on ESPN and DH on ABC does better than MNF on ABC and ice skating on ESPN.Originally posted by swede"The most popular sport" part is why. It's why ABC doesn't have Monday night football. ESPN paid a bazillion dollars for the rights and they're STILL making money.Originally posted by rdanomlyWhat I don't get is how the freaking Golf Channel is on my non-fancy cable, but the most popular sport in the nation's dedicated channel isn't."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment
-
I've corresponded with both Charter and the NFL. What it boils down to is that Charter knows it's a big money maker for them and they refuse to carry it on basic cable because the real cost to them per subscriber is about $0.18. Because Charter wants to make a hug profit from it, they want to make up a sports tier, something they don't have now, probably for $20 a month. They know that no on will care if their cable bill goes up $0.80 a month if the NFL network is on there. The big money for them is in the sports package and that is the sticking point. The NFL charges what it charges for it's network and the cable companies want to jack up the price because of the high demand and the NFL won't allow that. So in a backwards way, the NFL is looking out for it's fans albeit in a wierd way having the games on NFLN to begiun with."Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
– Benjamin Franklin
Comment
-
I never let facts get in the way of a good rant, Mraynrand, but that is a very interesting nugget of info regarding ABC and ESPN.Originally posted by mraynrandABC and ESPN are owned by the same parent company, Disney. NBC is the company that paid a bazillion for SNF, so they wouldn't be locked out of the FB market. Shows like Desperate Housewives do better than MNF - or at least the combination of MNF on ESPN and DH on ABC does better than MNF on ABC and ice skating on ESPN.Originally posted by swedeIt's why ABC doesn't have Monday night football. ESPN paid a bazillion dollars for the rights and they're STILL making money.
So did ABC and ESPN bid against each other, or did Disney make the call?[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
wireless broadband is fairly common and probably available where you live. My father can get it, and he is in the literal "middle of nowhere".Originally posted by MadScientistBroadband is also an issue. I'd gladly ditch Charter if I could get DSL, but I can't. I'd much rather live without NFLN than without broadband.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MerlinUnfortunately for people like me, Charter is the only real high speed internet provider in our area.
BULL. You can get wireless broadband in your area for 19.95 to 39.95 per month....
visit this website, then quit your bitching.
Northwest Wisconsin’s provider of internet, managed solutions, and smart home technology! Create your dream smart home with easy-to-use automation products and stunning designs, all powered by our state-of-the-art fiber optic internet.
here's a second offering:
The rest of you? See this website, you can probably get it too from a provider in your area. Together, we CAN put Charter, Comcast and Verizon out of business...
Comment
-
Well, isn't wireless broadband kind of aimed at those who are in the middle of nowhere? Towers are usually constructed in outlying areas, where people are simply too far from the CO for DSL. TDS Metrocom launched this in the Appleton area about two years ago and it's been doing fairly well. Then again, most of those people don't have much of a choice for broadband, either.Originally posted by retailguywireless broadband is fairly common and probably available where you live. My father can get it, and he is in the literal "middle of nowhere".Originally posted by MadScientistBroadband is also an issue. I'd gladly ditch Charter if I could get DSL, but I can't. I'd much rather live without NFLN than without broadband.
Comment
-
Not true. Go to the website and check it out. Most of southern wisc is covered and a great deal of the "north". WISP's are growing like weeds in Chicago right now, and working big deals with apartment buildings and home owners associations. Almost every major Metro area is covered, and covered WELL.Originally posted by GBRulzWell, isn't wireless broadband kind of aimed at those who are in the middle of nowhere? Towers are usually constructed in outlying areas, where people are simply too far from the CO for DSL. TDS Metrocom launched this in the Appleton area about two years ago and it's been doing fairly well. Then again, most of those people don't have much of a choice for broadband, either.Originally posted by retailguywireless broadband is fairly common and probably available where you live. My father can get it, and he is in the literal "middle of nowhere".Originally posted by MadScientistBroadband is also an issue. I'd gladly ditch Charter if I could get DSL, but I can't. I'd much rather live without NFLN than without broadband.
Comment
-
My cable rate would go up 350% if I were to get the NFL network.
Yes more than triple because I must buy every other channel before I can get NFL network. Comcast in my area has it as the ultimate channel in the pyramid.
Sattelite internet is DSL speed and expensive.
My brother near Rice Lake WI gets it as part of his basic package and asks me what is the big deal about it.
Comment
-
Having cable today is like owning an edsel. Satellite is a better option and now the broadband concerns are reduced with wireless broadband. My directtv did not switch games in the 3rd or 4th quarter. Had I wanted to watch any other game, I would have, because they were all there for the watching.... I also have NFL network, and it just costs the basic monthly direct tv fee...Originally posted by CaliforniaCheezMy cable rate would go up 350% if I were to get the NFL network.
Yes more than triple because I must buy every other channel before I can get NFL network. Comcast in my area has it as the ultimate channel in the pyramid.
Sattelite internet is DSL speed and expensive.
My brother near Rice Lake WI gets it as part of his basic package and asks me what is the big deal about it.
Comment



Comment