Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

"Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 4
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
  • #31
    Stopping AP is one task; another is stopping the myriad of penalties by the Packers. If the penalties don't stop then Vikings win.

    Packers are the 2nd most penalized team - that WILL come back to bite ya.
    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2019,
    PackerRats Thompson D. Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2018,
    PackerRats Pick'Em 2016-17 Champ + Packers year Survival Football Champ 2017,
    Rats Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2013,
    Ratz Survival Football Champ 2012,
    PackerRats1 Yahoo Fantasy Football Champ 2006.

    Comment

    • #32
      AP may get over 100 yards tomorrow, but only if he busts at least one big one, 150 if he busts two. Other than that, KGB will be getting a lot of time in on third and "pass". Our front 7 showed LJ, and LT what happens when a real good running back goes against our defense, my concern is less with Peterson than Childress actually gameplanning for us, and realizing our safety situation is shit, and utilizes short passes, screens, and tight ends. If their passing game does what it should, not much, we should win, barring turnovers. But, that's why they play the games, watch out for their passing game to overachieve against an overaggressive 9 in the box defense misreading playaction (especially Bigby and the young db's).
      "...one thing about me during the course of a game, I get emotional and say things my grandmother lets me know about later. But nobody wants to win on that field anymore than I do, no one." Brett Favre

      Comment

      • #33
        Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

        Originally posted by gbpackfan
        I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
        Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

        Comment

        • #34
          Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

          Originally posted by Packgator
          Originally posted by gbpackfan
          I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
          Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

          I think they are saying that the Green Bay Packers played him ok, and he got hurt.
          Not only that. but Green Bay had a huge advantage in time of possesion.

          He can't tote the rock when Green Bay has the ball....


          Your take?

          Comment

          • #35
            Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

            Originally posted by Packgator
            Originally posted by gbpackfan
            I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
            Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

            It should be fairly obvious, but I'll spell it out for you since you didn't figure it out. Injury and time of possesion.

            Comment

            • #36
              Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

              Originally posted by Rastak
              Originally posted by Packgator
              Originally posted by gbpackfan
              I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
              Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

              I think they are saying that the Green Bay Packers played him ok, and he got hurt.
              Not only that. but Green Bay had a huge advantage in time of possesion.

              He can't tote the rock when Green Bay has the ball....


              Your take?
              Fire your D-Coordinator. Where did they find this clown?

              Comment

              • #37
                Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

                Originally posted by cpk1994
                Originally posted by Rastak
                Originally posted by Packgator
                Originally posted by gbpackfan
                I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
                Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

                I think they are saying that the Green Bay Packers played him ok, and he got hurt.
                Not only that. but Green Bay had a huge advantage in time of possesion.

                He can't tote the rock when Green Bay has the ball....


                Your take?
                Fire your D-Coordinator. Where did they find this clown?

                Nah, fire the head coach.

                Comment

                • #38
                  Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

                  [quote="Rastak"][quote="Packgator"]
                  Originally posted by gbpackfan
                  Your take?
                  He had a couple of explosive and powerful runs early......which showed what kind of a back he is. I dread having to play him twice each season for the next ten years. I wish he was a Packer. But the bottom line for this game is just 45 rushing yards......regardless of how or why. Now I don't have to worry about him anymore.......until next year.

                  Comment

                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Tony Oday
                    He will not top 100 this week...


                    Nostradomis?
                    "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

                    Comment

                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Tony Oday
                      He will not top 100 this week...
                      I think Double H owes you 5 clams.
                      sigpic

                      Comment

                      • #41
                        Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

                        Originally posted by Rastak
                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        Originally posted by Rastak
                        Originally posted by Packgator
                        Originally posted by gbpackfan
                        I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
                        Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

                        I think they are saying that the Green Bay Packers played him ok, and he got hurt.
                        Not only that. but Green Bay had a huge advantage in time of possesion.

                        He can't tote the rock when Green Bay has the ball....


                        Your take?
                        Fire your D-Coordinator. Where did they find this clown?

                        Nah, fire the head coach.
                        Fire both of them. That was one of the most brutally called games by a D-Coordinator ever. How do you not blitz Favre. Was totally outclassed. He makes Bob Slowik look like a Defensive Guru.

                        Comment

                        • #42
                          Re: "Peterson to kill Packers." - You hear that D?

                          Originally posted by cpk1994
                          Originally posted by Rastak
                          Originally posted by cpk1994
                          Originally posted by Rastak
                          Originally posted by Packgator
                          Originally posted by gbpackfan
                          I have been going to all kinds of Packers / Vikings forums. The talk in almost every site, especially Vikings' forums, is how Adrian Peterson is going to run for another 300 yards against the Packers. DON'T THINK FOR A MINUTE THE PACKERS ARE GOING TO LET YOUR ONLY OFFENSIVE WEAPON BEAT US! NOT IN OUR HOUSE. HE'S GOING TO GET SOME YARDS, BUT IT ISN'T GOING TO BE THE AP SHOW! AT LAMBEAU, THE BRIGHTEST STAR IS GOING TO BE BRETT FAVRE!!!
                          Nice call on your counter to the Viking fans. Those 45 yards were something. What are they saying now?

                          I think they are saying that the Green Bay Packers played him ok, and he got hurt.
                          Not only that. but Green Bay had a huge advantage in time of possesion.

                          He can't tote the rock when Green Bay has the ball....


                          Your take?
                          Fire your D-Coordinator. Where did they find this clown?

                          Nah, fire the head coach.
                          Fire both of them. That was one of the most brutally called games by a D-Coordinator ever. How do you not blitz Favre. Was totally outclassed. He makes Bob Slowik look like a Defensive Guru.
                          No shit. 3 man rush half the game......wtf?

                          Comment

                          • #43
                            Blitzing Favre is sort of a "damned if you do/damned if you don't" sort of thing. Favre is one of the better QBs in the league at getting passes out quick, and plays in an offense designed to do this. But at the same time, if you stand back there and leave him unmolested he'll pick apart the defense. Peyton Manning is the same way.

                            I think the Vikings game plan was "drop a hojillion guys into coverage and dare the Packers to run the ball" (like the Redskins did, somewhat successfully), the problem being that Green Bay was able to run against that and the defensive gameplan never really recovered or adjusted.
                            </delurk>

                            Comment

                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                              Originally posted by Tony Oday
                              He will not top 100 this week...
                              I'll bet you $5 he does.
                              You owe me $5
                              Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.

                              Comment

                              • #45
                                After the past couple of games, I don't think anyone disputes AP's talent, and ability to get it done.

                                However, the jury is still out on if he can survive with his upright running style. Was this injury related to that, or just a fluke? Did Harris hit him low, or was he running high.

                                I guess time will tell. I don't like the idea of playing against him twice a year for the next 10 either, but I'm not so sure we'll have to.
                                --
                                Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 2 3 4 template Next
                                Working...
                                X