If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
If the question is, who is the next all pro running back for the Green Bay Packers, Grant is not the answer.
I remember when many people said that of Ahman Green.
"I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh
do u STILL think the bears are a better football team?
A better team than what team? They are probably better than Oakland, although that might change. Most good teams can't survive an onslaught of injuries and the Bears, much like the 2002 Packers, are a shadow of their Superbowl selves due to injuries. That doesn't mean they might not sweep the season series with Green Bay, because if nothing else, we know that even poor Chicago teams will more often than not play good Green Bay teams very hard.
If the question is, who is the next all pro running back for the Green Bay Packers, Grant is not the answer.
I remember when many people said that of Ahman Green.
Sure and they were almost correct - Ahman Green was named second string all-pro at running back in 2003. I would be shocked if Grant ever made all-pro. Grant seems to have some upside, but doesn't have the same power and speed as Ahman Green, and wasn't ever confused for a guy who did coming out of college. But that's not a terrible fate - Ahman Green was one of the best three-four backs from 2000-2004. Grant may still be a highly effective running back.
If the question is, who is the next all pro running back for the Green Bay Packers, Grant is not the answer.
I remember when many people said that of Ahman Green.
Sure and they were almost correct - Ahman Green was named second string all-pro at running back in 2003. I would be shocked if Grant ever made all-pro. Grant seems to have some upside, but doesn't have the same power and speed as Ahman Green, and wasn't ever confused for a guy who did coming out of college. But that's not a terrible fate - Ahman Green was one of the best three-four backs from 2000-2004. Grant may still be a highly effective running back.
kind of missed the point of that one...Wasn't saying he's gonna be all pro, but if he's a solid runner, that's all I need personally.
"I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh
kind of missed the point of that one...Wasn't saying he's gonna be all pro, but if he's a solid runner, that's all I need personally.
But you drew a comparison t comments about Ahman Green. Now, had you referred back to comments regarding Levens or Bennett when they were drafted that might have been different.
Cleft, I heard during the game that Favre was bow hunting for deer during his time off. Does this change your opinion of him? I used to think he was a nice man.
I don't think there's any hard in thinning he deer herd. Decreases the chance of me hitting them on my motorcycle. I still have the road rash scars from a deer vs. motorcycle crash last year. My wife's scars are even worse - but at least we saw that historic football stadium in Steven's point.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Second, damn fine effort by the Packers. Is Grant the answer at RB?
Did Childress draft the Vikings QBs? Did Childress trade Randy Moss and get nothing for him? I guess the answer is that I don't know, but I'm certain the decision will be made with all the same careful illogic and poor football instincts with which virtually every other recent Viking move has been made.
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Cleft, according to the radio guys, Favre was missing high with receivers in the first half, along with four drops by wides. Blip on the radar or a sign of second half fatigue?
Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.
Cleft, according to the radio guys, Favre was missing high with receivers in the first half, along with four drops by wides. Blip on the radar or a sign of second half fatigue?
If it were a sign of second half fatigue, I would imagine that you'd see more fatigue in the second half than in the first half, right? But seriously, I thought (and wrote a column) arguing that Favre would have ups and downs, and the downs would follow games in which he was battered a bit. Favre got hit a lot in KC, and still threw well today. That has to be a good sign for Packer fans.
I watch the last two games with my wife, the Packers won both games, do I still have to watch the games with her if I don't want to?
I'm not a scientist, Mr. Nutz, but I would imagine that you need more data points. Still, the most impressing thing about your question is the implication that you can decide whether or not your wife watches the game with you. Most guys who claim that kind of power over their wives are either lying or are divorced.
mr crusty, the coach was pretty daring today with the 4th down calls. were those calls acts of desperation or confidence?
Good question.
** Since 2006 3 X Pro Pickem' Champion; 4 X Runner-Up and 3 X 3rd place.
** To download Jesus Loves Me ring tones, you'll need a cell phone mame
** If God doesn't fish, play poker or pull for " the Packers ", exactly what does HE do with his buds?
** Rather than love, money or fame - give me TRUTH: Henry D. Thoreau
Comment