Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ted's Biggest Screw Up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by cpk1994
    Originally posted by cheesner
    Originally posted by FritzDontBlitz
    Just the fact TTT drafted no-names like Greg Jennings in 2006 in the 2nd round (gasp!) and James Jones in the 3rd (?) shows a lack of draftday savvy.
    Those were TT's famous 'I am smarter than you' picks. Why this is bad is because he is drafting really good players that most fans have not heard of. When TT uses his greater football intellect this makes the Packers a better team. Therefore, ah. um. I forgot why this was such a bad thing.
    Congratulations. If this isn't sarcasm you just proved you are as smart as Merlin.


    I have seen TT ridiculed for doing 'I am smarter than you' draft picks. I have yet to understand the reasoning. Collins, Jennings, and Jones are listed in this category. 3 of the better steals of the draft in the year that they came out. Yet TT still takes flack for them.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by mrbojangles
      Originally posted by cpk1994
      Originally posted by cheesner
      Originally posted by FritzDontBlitz
      Just the fact TTT drafted no-names like Greg Jennings in 2006 in the 2nd round (gasp!) and James Jones in the 3rd (?) shows a lack of draftday savvy.
      Those were TT's famous 'I am smarter than you' picks. Why this is bad is because he is drafting really good players that most fans have not heard of. When TT uses his greater football intellect this makes the Packers a better team. Therefore, ah. um. I forgot why this was such a bad thing.
      Congratulations. If this isn't sarcasm you just proved you are as smart as Merlin.

      Wasn't Merlin a wizard and therefore smart??? Am I missing the metaphor or is Merlin getting payback for his lack of faith. Speaking of which, why didn't I see his name on the crow list that Partial started?
      For the same reason you will never see Woody's there either.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Scott Campbell
        Hey!!

        Where's Wist?
        Been on IR with some broken bones, but I'm back for the most part... still on crutches, but hobbling around ok.

        I had been on the fence with TT - liking some moves, hating some others... but, I'm a general supporter now. Will never be a shill, but I have more faith in TT than I did.

        I'm more in McCarthy's camp than TT's... but, TT did take a huge risk in hiring McCarthy, and it's worked out; so, TT gets credit for that too.
        wist

        Comment


        • #19
          I wonder if 3 years into Ron Wolf's hiring as GM, if Packer fans were debating his effectiveness/contribution to the teams success vs. the impact of hiring Homgren?

          Of course Ron Wolf never had to deal with the upheaval of a previous administration that was good record-wise, but mediocre to below average general management-wise. In some ways it's good to walk into a situation that is clearly a mess, instead of one that is debateably a mess, as Thompson did.
          "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

          Comment


          • #20
            Kurt Schottenheimer is dragging the secondary down. Fire him, I say.
            "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

            KYPack

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by cheesner
              Originally posted by cpk1994
              Originally posted by cheesner
              Originally posted by FritzDontBlitz
              Just the fact TTT drafted no-names like Greg Jennings in 2006 in the 2nd round (gasp!) and James Jones in the 3rd (?) shows a lack of draftday savvy.
              Those were TT's famous 'I am smarter than you' picks. Why this is bad is because he is drafting really good players that most fans have not heard of. When TT uses his greater football intellect this makes the Packers a better team. Therefore, ah. um. I forgot why this was such a bad thing.
              Congratulations. If this isn't sarcasm you just proved you are as smart as Merlin.


              I have seen TT ridiculed for doing 'I am smarter than you' draft picks. I have yet to understand the reasoning. Collins, Jennings, and Jones are listed in this category. 3 of the better steals of the draft in the year that they came out. Yet TT still takes flack for them.
              Cheesner, Fritz's post was sarcasm. I think you need to learn exactly what that is. I guess its true then. You are a smart as Merlin, and that is not a compliment.

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by wist43
                Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                Hey!!

                Where's Wist?
                Been on IR with some broken bones, but I'm back for the most part... still on crutches, but hobbling around ok.

                I had been on the fence with TT - liking some moves, hating some others... but, I'm a general supporter now. Will never be a shill, but I have more faith in TT than I did.

                I'm more in McCarthy's camp than TT's... but, TT did take a huge risk in hiring McCarthy, and it's worked out; so, TT gets credit for that too.

                Glad to see you and hear that you're mostly ok.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by cheesner
                  I have seen TT ridiculed for doing 'I am smarter than you' draft picks. I have yet to understand the reasoning. Collins, Jennings, and Jones are listed in this category. 3 of the better steals of the draft in the year that they came out. Yet TT still takes flack for them.

                  NOT SO FAST!


                  Ted screwed up there too. He should have picked Collins in the 4th round instead of the 2nd. He should have waited until the 5th round on Jennings. And nobody in their right mind would have drafted Jones. We could have signed him as an undrafted free agent.


                  Damn you to hell TED THOMPSON!

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by packrat
                    Keep digging Merlin, keep digging. You're going to get to the bottom of the hole you are digging for yourself eventually.
                    Funny but I am not in a hole, why? Because unlike the "WE ARE EIGHT AND ONE" crowd who use that as their only valid reason to show blind support for Thompson, some of us actually notice the missteps and there have been plenty. That's why this thread is so laughable. Nothing like a bunch of good ol' boys with a collective IQ of 4 touting the same old "WE ARE EIGHT AND ONE" crap. At least my arguments have merit and substance and I haven't changed those arguments because they are all valid. Nothing like getting "but but but we got Jennings!" or "but but but we got Woodson!", or the latest "but but but we are eight and one" excuses to wash away the mistakes made by Thompson. Sherman made mistakes and these same good ol' boys were all over him like white on rice. Were Sherman's mistakes worse then Thompson's? I mean all the guy did was win right? And if that is the whole argument as to why Thompson is a god of a GM, then how's come the hypocrisy over Sherman? Heck, let's go back to Wolf's missteps, he was a god right? But Sherman wasn't?

                    I guess it takes an IQ over 4 to see the irony in using a particular player(s) signing and some winning as the yardstick for 2 of our last 3 GM's, but the one that did have some good signings and won, he doesn't get measured that way. So which is it? What it the measurement of a good GM? Tell me, I really want to hear the hypocrisy in this answer.
                    "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
                    – Benjamin Franklin

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Yeah, yeah, yeah.

                      And if we by some lucky cirucumstance happen to win the next 5 or 6 Superbowls, don't let that silly statistic fool the rest of you chumps. Because Ted will STILL SUCK.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by wist43
                        .....I had been on the fence with TT - liking some moves, hating some others... but, I'm a general supporter now. Will never be a shill, but I have more faith in TT than I did.........


                        Here's my take. Once Ted won over Wist, all you're left with are the lunatics.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                          Originally posted by wist43
                          .....I had been on the fence with TT - liking some moves, hating some others... but, I'm a general supporter now. Will never be a shill, but I have more faith in TT than I did.........


                          Here's my take. Once Ted won over Wist, all you're left with are the lunatics.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by Merlin
                            What it the measurement of a good GM? Tell me, I really want to hear the hypocrisy in this answer.
                            Wins and losses.

                            8-1 and playoff bound.
                            Think I'll roll another number for the road.
                            I HATE everything about the Minnesota Vikings

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Merlin
                              Nothing like a bunch of good ol' boys with a collective IQ of 4 touting the same old "WE ARE EIGHT AND ONE" crap.


                              IQ of 4, huh? Well I guess there must be a lot of drool on PackerRat keyboards.


                              You seem to be backed into a serious corner. The only way you'll be vindicated is if this team completely goes into the tank. Then you'll be one of just the couple left that will be right, with the vast majority of us morons being proven completely wrong. Maybe you and Woody will have a fan club if that happens.

                              Until then, I'll just assume the best. I'll swirl that Koolaide around my glass, inhale the succulent aroma of the 8-1 record, and enjoy gulp after delectable gulp. Because this is a blast.

                              Thanks Ted.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Merlin
                                Originally posted by packrat
                                Keep digging Merlin, keep digging. You're going to get to the bottom of the hole you are digging for yourself eventually.
                                Funny but I am not in a hole, why? Because unlike the "WE ARE EIGHT AND ONE" crowd who use that as their only valid reason to show blind support for Thompson, some of us actually notice the missteps and there have been plenty. That's why this thread is so laughable. Nothing like a bunch of good ol' boys with a collective IQ of 4 touting the same old "WE ARE EIGHT AND ONE" crap. At least my arguments have merit and substance and I haven't changed those arguments because they are all valid. Nothing like getting "but but but we got Jennings!" or "but but but we got Woodson!", or the latest "but but but we are eight and one" excuses to wash away the mistakes made by Thompson. Sherman made mistakes and these same good ol' boys were all over him like white on rice. Were Sherman's mistakes worse then Thompson's? I mean all the guy did was win right? And if that is the whole argument as to why Thompson is a god of a GM, then how's come the hypocrisy over Sherman? Heck, let's go back to Wolf's missteps, he was a god right? But Sherman wasn't?

                                I guess it takes an IQ over 4 to see the irony in using a particular player(s) signing and some winning as the yardstick for 2 of our last 3 GM's, but the one that did have some good signings and won, he doesn't get measured that way. So which is it? What it the measurement of a good GM? Tell me, I really want to hear the hypocrisy in this answer.
                                .................................................. .................................................. .

                                You're great reasoning skills win again!
                                An 8-1 record should be cause for outrage at the GM who is responsible for assembling such a sorry excuse for a team.
                                Who Knows? The Shadow knows!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X