Should Tramon Williams be returning punts?

[Scott Campbell]

snarky
One entry found.

snarky



Main Entry: snarky
Pronunciation: \ˈsnär-kē\
Function: adjective
Etymology: dialect snark to annoy, perhaps alteration of nark to irritate
Date: 1906
1 : crotchety, snappish
2 : sarcastic, impertinent, or irreverent in tone or manner <snarky lyrics>
— snark·i·ly \-kə-lē\ adverb

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/snarky

What's wrong with Scott in snarky mode?

Not a god damned thing.

[Scott Campbell]

I sound like Tex.

[FritzDontBlitz]

I kinda wonder what those 10 people who voted to keep Woodson as the return man are feeling right now....

[b bulldog]

It's the NFL, guys get hurt. I voted to keep him back there and what am I feeling?? I'm feeling anger towards Bush for not blocking his guy so Chuck would have scored a TD and wouldn't have gotten hurt, that is what I'm feeling.

[FritzDontBlitz]

It's the NFL, guys get hurt. I voted to keep him back there and what am I feeling?? I'm feeling anger towards Bush for not blocking his guy so Chuck would have scored a TD and wouldn't have gotten hurt, that is what I'm feeling.

LMAO

Please tell me you aren't the guy who dogged out Bush in the postgame chat.....

[Brohm]

I voted to have Woodson back there. I think it is a sound decision (roll the tape of Philly's loss to us).

He is a playmaker and wants the ball in his hands. He was making a play when he got hurt. What if it was an interception return and not a punt return? Would it make a difference then? No. It's football and injuries happen.

No remorse about the decision here and MM feels the same way (see other thread). I did shudder last week (was it last week?) when he got leveled catching a punt, but that's the risk/reward.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I feel the same way as brohm. If Woodson is the best punt returner we have, I say put him out there. Now, if Tramon Williams is just as capable of doing it, then get him out there.

[RashanGary]

I feel the same way as brohm. If Woodson is the best punt returner we have, I say put him out there. Now, if Tramon Williams is just as capable of doing it, then get him out there.

If Tramon Williams is 80% of the punt returner that Woodson is, he shoudl be out there. I'll bet Favre would be a more versitile weapon on FG holds. It would probably leave options of fakes and such. Shoould we have Favre as the FG holder because it would be best for that one game? NO!!

This is all hindsight. Chuck really wanted to do it, and he gives his heart to this team partly because the team respects him. I wish he wasn't doing it, but if he really really wanted it, I'm not going to point fingers. He loves to have the ball in his hands. I'm glad he got the oppertunity and I hope he gets healthy for the playoffs. Next weeks game just got a lot harder, but there are more important goals this season and those are not lost yet. I hope Woodson is done with PR duty. This season is just too important to gamble on just because he really likes doing it.

[FritzDontBlitz]

I voted to have Woodson back there. I think it is a sound decision (roll the tape of Philly's loss to us).

He is a playmaker and wants the ball in his hands. He was making a play when he got hurt. What if it was an interception return and not a punt return? Would it make a difference then? No. It's football and injuries happen.

No remorse about the decision here and MM feels the same way (see other thread). I did shudder last week (was it last week?) when he got leveled catching a punt, but that's the risk/reward.

I can live with that assertion. I just double over laughing when people claim its Bush's fault Woody got hurt because he couldn't make an impossible block on a guy that was behind him, yet everyone fails to notice that AJ Hawk had a clear shot at the guy and completely whiffed on blocking him a second or two before he got near Woody...