Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers Placing "bounties"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Packers Placing "bounties"

    From PFT.com

    POSTED 11:55 a.m. EST, November 19, 2007

    LEAGUE LOOKING AT WHETHER PACKERS ARE VIOLATING BOUNTY RULES

    NFL spokesman Greg Aiello tells us that the league is looking into the question of whether members of the Green Bay Packers have violated the league's rules against bounties.

    On Sunday, Bob Holtzmann of ESPN reported during Sunday NFL Countdown that a couple of Packers defensive backs had promised to pay each of the team's defensive linemen $500 if there were able to hold Vikings running back Adrian Peterson under 100 yards rushing in Week Ten.

    They succeeded.

    For Week Eleven, another $500 per lineman was promised if the Packers held the Panthers to under 60 yards rushing.

    They failed.

    We asked Aiello whether these extra payments counted against the salary cap, given that they were coming from teammates and not from the team. Aiello said that it's not a cap issue, but he explained that the league is looking at whether such promises are impermissible bounties.

    The classic bounty is an offer of money or other benefits in exchange for injuring a player. But to the extent that limiting a player's production can be satisfied in part by, for example, tearing the player's LCL, it's probably not a good idea for incentives of this nature to be dangled in front of NFL players.

    Stay tuned.



    This is pretty funny!!!
    If you don't like me....bite me...
    ....want some, come get some!

  • #2
    That doesn't fit my definition of a bounty. A bounty is when you pay somebody to take a player out.


    Though maybe this violates some part of the CBA.

    Comment


    • #3
      Seems a bit petty to me. It's not like they are paying a DL to have a QB slammed into the ground and his shoulder separated....

      I see it as more along the lines of a QB taking his OL out to dinner after a good performance.
      sigpic

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Brohm
        Seems a bit petty to me. It's not like they are paying a DL to have a QB slammed into the ground and his shoulder separated....

        I see it as more along the lines of a QB taking his OL out to dinner after a good performance.

        It seems far more like paying a player a bonus for making it to the Pro Bowl than it equates to a bounty.

        Comment


        • #5
          I always thought bounty was the quicker picker upper.

          Or some cheesy Charles Laughton movie.
          Always respect your opponent, even when you're kicking the crap outta him.

          Comment


          • #6
            Does this mean Marino's watches and Isotoner gloves for his linemen should have been considered bounties for protecting his ass from getting sacked?
            "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

            Comment


            • #7
              This report is so stupid. I am of the belief that every team has players that make friendly bets with each other. And Florio should have written that it was Al Harris' tackle that injured AP, not a D-linemen. Al didn't "earn" any money by taking him out. Cheap shot by Florio that will have Vikings fans going nuts.

              Comment


              • #8
                Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

                Comment


                • #9
                  This is impressively stupid. You could read this on Saturday Night Live's fake news show and it would fit right in.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    This just in...who cares? Much ado about doo doo. What's next? The NFL investigates locker room card games?
                    "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This does give me an idea.

                      I've got $100 for anybody who can take out Harlan's computer.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                        This does give me an idea.

                        I've got $100 for anybody who can take out Harlan's computer.
                        If I could do that I wouldn't need your lousy $100.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          ROFL

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I wonder if this 'controversy' will last longer in the consciousness of the NFL league office than 'spygate.'
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by mraynrand
                              I wonder if this 'controversy' will last longer in the consciousness of the NFL league office than 'spygate.'


                              First it would have to get legs - meaning it would have to be picked up by some more credible news sources than PFT.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X