Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Aaron Rodgers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aaron Rodgers

    Let me be the first to say that I was truly impressed with Aaron Rogers composure in the situation he was put under. I felt that he played a very good game. Although I am not ready to crown him our next starter, he has proven that he is at least a serviceable backup.

    Yes, I am eating crow right now. Up until this point, Rodgers hasn't shown me any life, he made me re-think my opinion tonight. Although he telegraphed his passes and was skidish in the pocket, at least he had the common sense to pull it down and run with it. That gave us an element to our offense that Favre hasn't had in years. He made the throws he needed to even if they weren't anything spectacular. He managed the game and kept his composure and both of those attributes make all of the difference when looking at a starting QB for your team. Although he is extremely rough and not as well versed as would be expected for a 3rd year backup, hopefully he will get more playing time the next 4 games as the Packers beat the crap out of their remaining opponents.

    On a negative note, our defensive play calling was horrible. Our secondary looked horrible, Harris looked lost and we now know we have no one who can backup Woodson currently. Our special teams looked horrible and I have to question the offensive play calling after our first drive up until Favre left the game.

    Other then that, I believe the Packers have a legitimate shot at going all the way. They will not lose to this team again should they meet. Clearly the Cowboy's gave it all they had and they only beat us by 10. After being up by 17, with our second string QB in the game, they couldn't stop us very well. Next time we will have our whole defense (I hope) and Favre appears to be "ok" at this point. If I were a Cowboys fan, I would be worried about playing this team again.

    Does anyone know how teams that play 3 games in 12 days fair? I think going 2-1 in basically a 2 game time frame is pretty good. We have lots of good things to look forward to.
    "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
    – Benjamin Franklin

  • #2
    Good post. Especially the defensive play calling. It was god awful. They essentially took Harris out of the game by dropping him into a zone. He is too slow to play zone coverage.

    Comment


    • #3
      It was odd that there was an article this week about how the last time the Packers faced T.O., they tried to play zone on him and it didn't work. It didn't work this time either.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        Bob Sanders is not the answer. I think he has all the parts, he just doesn't know how to put them together. This defense is over-rated and underachieving. There is no reason for any team to torch us the entire game. A few plays, yeah. The whole game, no.
        "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
        – Benjamin Franklin

        Comment


        • #5
          You could make a case for us losing the game because of the decision to let Woodson return punts.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Aaron Rodgers

            Originally posted by Merlin
            We have lots of good things to look forward to.


            I assume you're talking about Ted's induction to the HOF?

            Comment


            • #7
              Nice post, Merlin. He was skiddish, but he showed real signs against a starting defense for the first time. It was nice to see but it's not time to crown anyone.
              Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

              Comment


              • #8
                He was skiddish because they were dominating the trenches. They sure were getting after us. It was a pretty impressive game for him considering we were down and they were sicking the dogs on him.

                Comment


                • #9
                  The Packers played zone because TO was dictating the entire Packers D. Did you not notice that on almost every play they sent him in motion? The Packers tried to play man for a while, it didn't work.

                  Playing in space is not Al's game at all. If he can't get his hands on the opposing WR he is average and his lack of quickness really shows. The Packers tried man and TO either got free releases against Al and was able to beat him or got switched off onto one of the other DB's and faced no challenge at all. They tried zone, which all their DB's seem to struggle with. It was really lose-lose.

                  It was a great game plan by Garrett.

                  Al did play like shit though, he didn't play the ball well in the air at all.
                  Go PACK

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I don't get why they didn't move Harris with him in motion. I thought it was a terrible game plan. I bet Al gets reamed out for manning up on several zone plays.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Partial
                      I don't get why they didn't move Harris with him in motion. I thought it was a terrible game plan. I bet Al gets reamed out for manning up on several zone plays.
                      They did off and on. TO is way too quick for Harris. If he can't get the jam on him it's over. And it's pretty tough to jam a moving target.
                      Go PACK

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Bossman641
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        I don't get why they didn't move Harris with him in motion. I thought it was a terrible game plan. I bet Al gets reamed out for manning up on several zone plays.
                        They did off and on. TO is way too quick for Harris. If he can't get the jam on him it's over. And it's pretty tough to jam a moving target.
                        You can't be moving when the ball is snapped. He has to take a moment and become stationary. I agree with you though. They kept Al off of him because its all over if he gets past him. I thought Nick Collins was invisible today. Personally, I would have put two men on Owens at the LOS. Don't let him get into a route at all. I mean everyone knows a safety is committed strictly to stopping Owens so why even try to disguise it? Plus by doing this it opens up some additional blitzing options.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Back to Aaron Rodgers. One dimension he brings that Favre does not have is running ability. I counted at least 3 times tonight where Rodgers ran for a first down. Favre cannot do that anymore.

                          As Merlin posted above, I thought Rodgers did a very commendable job as a reserve. At one point, he had completed 7passes in a row.

                          Rodgers twice led the Packers on touchdown scoring drives. I feel much more confident with him as the Packers #2 and potential heir apparent to Favre.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Merlin
                            Bob Sanders is not the answer. I think he has all the parts, he just doesn't know how to put them together. This defense is over-rated and underachieving. There is no reason for any team to torch us the entire game. A few plays, yeah. The whole game, no.
                            I think Thompson is partly to blame as well.

                            I'm not sure he understands the need for COVERAGE safeties in the scheme. He keeps going after physical guys who can't really cover all that well. Collins. Bigby. Manuel. Rouse.

                            This defensive scheme needs COVERAGE safeties...guys who can sit back there and help the CBs when they get beat off the LOS. Without coverage safeties, guys like Owens will always kill us simply by going in motion and attacking the safeties.

                            We have the players up front that we shouldn't need a ton of run support from the safeties...especially against a talented passing team like Dallas.
                            My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Partial
                              Originally posted by Bossman641
                              Originally posted by Partial
                              I don't get why they didn't move Harris with him in motion. I thought it was a terrible game plan. I bet Al gets reamed out for manning up on several zone plays.
                              They did off and on. TO is way too quick for Harris. If he can't get the jam on him it's over. And it's pretty tough to jam a moving target.
                              You can't be moving when the ball is snapped. He has to take a moment and become stationary. I agree with you though. They kept Al off of him because its all over if he gets past him. I thought Nick Collins was invisible today. Personally, I would have put two men on Owens at the LOS. Don't let him get into a route at all. I mean everyone knows a safety is committed strictly to stopping Owens so why even try to disguise it? Plus by doing this it opens up some additional blitzing options.
                              You can't be moving forward but you can certainly be moving along the LOS. They had TO in motion nearly every play.
                              Go PACK

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X