Packers sign Craig Nall

[Badgerinmaine]

Nall should be #2, he's better than Rodgers.

At what? :P

[retailguy]

Nall should be #2, he's better than Rodgers.

At what? :P

golfing and hunting with favre

[Badgerinmaine]

Nall should be #2, he's better than Rodgers.

At what? :P

golfing and hunting with favre

Well, then, we could have brought in Mark Chmura just as well .

[Pacopete4]

ive been a big craig nall fan since the beginning.. glad this guys getting a second chance.. make fun of him all u want but he performed everytime we asked him to.. you guys bitch and moan cuz rodgers doesnt do that.. well we had a guy that did and that wasnt good enough either.. hes a backup that could do the job had he have to step in a game.. congrats to him

[Tony Oday]

Favre needed an ice fishing buddy hehe

[gureski]

Wonder where Gureski is...

I just found out one minute ago. I wonder if this has anything to do with Wade Phillips saying his team throws a better Javelin than ours?

Nall Ball rides again! Woo HOooo!

I haven't been around much because I've been finishing up some schooling and that's been keeping me busy but when news like Nall coming back occurs.....I have to make time to post.

I'll be a more active poster towards the end of December and January. See you guys then.

[Bretsky]

Wonder where Gureski is...

I just found out one minute ago. I wonder if this has anything to do with Wade Phillips saying his team throws a better Javelin than ours?

Nall Ball rides again! Woo HOooo!

I haven't been around much because I've been finishing up some schooling and that's been keeping me busy but when news like Nall coming back occurs.....I have to make time to post.

I'll be a more active poster towards the end of December and January. See you guys then.

And the Nall Monster wakes up from Hibernation

[Merlin]

Nall is an insurance policy against Favre going down again. Then Favre doesn't have to stay suited up on the sidelines because there are only two active QB's on the roster. Nall will have to pick up the offense but I suspect more then likely he will be running the other teams offense to Rodgers has a chance to learn more then 10 plays.

Nall was given a raw deal in Green Bay the second Rodgers was picked. Say what you will and laugh all you want, but all he did was perform when asked to just like Herron. And although neither of them are popular with hardly anyone in the forum, you can't argue the on field performances in the regular season that they have given this team when asked to do so.

Nall will be gone after the season or signed to the practice squad (long shot). As long as Favre is on the team, Rodgers is the backup and there will be no dispute as to who the #2 is. Nor will there be any competition for that spot. There hasn't been since the day he was drafted. All other QB's are religated to 3rd string and play only with the scrubs in pre-season. Rodgers has never really been in that position since he was signed. I think that pretty much tells you what is expected.

[Carolina_Packer]

The move makes a lot of sense. I don't think Nall is ever going to be anything more than a decent backup QB in the NFL, but what's wrong with that? As Norm Peterson once said..."The world needs benchwarmers."

AR was drafted to succeed BF because they never really knew when Favre might hang it up. I don't think they ever thought Craig Nall was a serious enough contender, so why look elsewhere. The cream usually rises to the top, so one figures that when he went to an offensively challenged team like the Bills, with an unsettled QB situation, he should have had his chance to win the starters job. Again, that's OK. He is what he is, and the NFL needs the Craig Nall's too.

[swede]

Welcome back Gureski!

Even if it is just to make a quick preemptive post to beat down the "Nall for #2" crowd. Although, after last week, it ain't much of a crowd.