Cowboys Dominate?

[b bulldog]

aCTUALLY THE MORE i THINK ABOUT IT, I think Dallas is just better than us in pretty much all the matchups when both teams are on the field, offensively and defensively. I post this and watch the Cowboys lose today

[Freak Out]

Fuck the Cowboys.

[b bulldog]

Tarlam, I think Romo is better than favre cause he will get all day to throw to guys like TO and Witten. Brett won't have time. I'm picking the QB just because of the talent they will have to work with and I also don't like the way Brett plays in Dallas.

[Bretsky]

Tarlam, I think Romo is better than favre cause he will get all day to throw to guys like TO and Witten. Brett won't have time. I'm picking the QB just because of the talent they will have to work with and I also don't like the way Brett plays in Dallas.

I have a terribly hard time saying Dallas is Better than GB at every position.
Look at WR, and I fully understand that Dallas gets the edge at TE

Owens, Crayton, Huard, and ???
Driver, Jennings, James, Robinson, Martin

I had an argument with somebody at work of who I'd take between our top two WR's versus their top 2.

But I don't think there is much debate about the top 5. You could even add Glenn in there and I still think GB has a better top 5.

Actually I think most of the positions are fairly close........except OL

Dallas is heads and heels above us on the OL

[The Leaper]

aCTUALLY THE MORE i THINK ABOUT IT, I think Dallas is just better than us in pretty much all the matchups when both teams are on the field, offensively and defensively.

Offensively, Dallas gets the edge.

Defensively, our secondary when healthy is far better than the Dallas secondary. Our LBs are better as well. DL might be a draw...both are pretty good, although I think Green Bay is probably a little deeper.

[b bulldog]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

[VegasPackFan]

I have stated before to friends that because of the youth of our team, it could easily be said they will continue to improve each week. We are destroying teams right now that earlier we would have eked out a win against. We will be a better team than we were a few weeks ago if we meet in the NFC Championship game later this year. Will Dallas be a better team? We could catch up in talent and execution of gameplan.

Also, who do you think is the better coach? No chance in hell anyone picks Wade. I would have puked if the packers picked him to be the coach. Can that guy take a team to the SB?

Bottom line is that we have a chance.

[gbgary]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

i don't think they rush the passer better. our line has more sacks than their line (by ten or more). a third of their sacks are by linebackers and safeties. they HAVE to blitz more because of their weaker secondary. if we hadn't run so many "everybody go long" passes and empty backfield formations we would have been a lot better off. our defense was in a weakened state when we played dallas. owens is a force but with pressure on romo his long passes won't happen. like today romo will be throwing quick to barber and whitten. if m3 was gonna be "even more aggressive" it would have been better had it been on the defensive side of the ball and kept the offense as it had been all season.

[b bulldog]

Did you se the first half of the cowboys game

[gbgary]

Did you se the first half of the cowboys game

well yes. what part of my opinion do you disagree with? i am talking about the first half.

[pack4to84]

My prediction form earlier this year. Dallas will not reach us we will play the Vikings in the NFC Championship.

1st Rd
Vikings walk all over Seattle.
Bucs quash the Giants Eli throws 3 picks in loss.

2nd Rd
Vikings run all over Big D, AP 25 carries 225 yards.
Pack in 10 degree weather beat a I want to go home Bucs. Never winning in temps below 40.

Nfc Championship
Vikings vs Packers

[3irty1]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

I think you underestimate how important KGB and Chuck are to our D. Chuck allows them to have enough personnel to press and thus get more pressure on the QB.

I'd also like to speculate that KGB could give those giant o-lineman some fits in the pass rushing game.

[cpk1994]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

I think you underestimate how important KGB and Chuck are to our D. Chuck allows them to have enough personnel to press and thus get more pressure on the QB.

I'd also like to speculate that KGB could give those giant o-lineman some fits in the pass rushing game.

Exactly. Owens was motioned away from Harris many times because they knew the Woodson was out and there was nobady on the other side. With Woodson back, if TO motions he will have to deal with him.

[chain_gang]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

I think you underestimate how important KGB and Chuck are to our D. Chuck allows them to have enough personnel to press and thus get more pressure on the QB.

I'd also like to speculate that KGB could give those giant o-lineman some fits in the pass rushing game.

Exactly. Owens was motioned away from Harris many times because they knew the Woodson was out and there was nobady on the other side. With Woodson back, if TO motions he will have to deal with him.

I'd like to see KGB matched up on Marc Colombo, any chance of that happening. Colombo has the clumsy foot problem against quick pass rushers, Colombo can be good against power rushes, but speed rushers like KGB always gives him problems. Either way though, with a healthy KGB on third and 10 or more Romo doesn't have all day to find the open receiver deep.

[The Leaper]

if we hadn't run so many "everybody go long" passes and empty backfield formations we would have been a lot better off.

DING, DING, DING!

As I've said all along, and to the chagrin of many, McCARTHY KILLED OUR CHANCES WITH HIS GAMEPLAN!

He took us away from our strength. Using play-action gives Favre less time to sit back and observe the field, because he has to waste a couple seconds trying to fake a handoff. And we did this SIX TIMES in the first 20 plays.

I said it from well before the game...you sit Favre back in a shotgun so he can see the field and put 3+ WRs out there at all times and throw that ball on the first 30 plays against Dallas. You don't run play action. You don't try to get cute. You stick with the short passing game and let Driver, Jennings and the boys eat up yardage with their legs as they have all year.

Why McCarthy tried to go away from that is beyond me.