Cowboys Dominate?

[OS PA]

TO makes up for the differnce to give the boys an edge their imo and I think they rush the passer much better and we won't be able to cover TO.

I think you underestimate how important KGB and Chuck are to our D. Chuck allows them to have enough personnel to press and thus get more pressure on the QB.

I'd also like to speculate that KGB could give those giant o-lineman some fits in the pass rushing game.

Exactly. Owens was motioned away from Harris many times because they knew the Woodson was out and there was nobady on the other side. With Woodson back, if TO motions he will have to deal with him.

I'd like to see KGB matched up on Marc Colombo, any chance of that happening. Colombo has the clumsy foot problem against quick pass rushers, Colombo can be good against power rushes, but speed rushers like KGB always gives him problems. Either way though, with a healthy KGB on third and 10 or more Romo doesn't have all day to find the open receiver deep.

When Colombo was a LT for the Bears, he gave up four sacks to KGB in a game. Colombo is a RT now, and much better on this side than he was on the other. I'm not sure if KGB is the same player from either side of the field. I'm pretty sure Kampy could make the change without any problems, but it seems that once a speed rusher gets his craft down, switching his starting foot and his lean might just throw off his entire game.

I'll take my chances on Colombo with Kampy... For some reason(kool-aid), I think Kampy will get the best of him in round number two.

[b bulldog]

Once again, enen though the gameplan may have included throwing long, Brett shouldn't have thrown into triple coverage Columbo is greatly improved from his Bears days and in regards to Dallas and KGB, Romo lit us up numerous times when KGB wouldn't have been in the game and if he was to be in on second and say4-7, I'd run all day long at him. They missed Woodson more imo but we will struggle with them cause we will have to roll all our coverage to TO and that opens up Whitten. Dallas' weapons on offense really expose our bad S play.

[gbgary]

you saw dallas taken apart yesterday by DETROIT of all teams. they were shredded on the ground and through the air with the efficient, short passing game...kitna wasn't touched, no turn overs. had we used our normal game plan (with less empty back-field plays) the offense could have out-scored the blitzing boys. throw ANYTIME roy williams is on the field...ANYTIME!! by the way...owens was invisible yesterday. whitten and barber were the problems for detroit and only because they were ALLOWED to run free.

[4and12to12and4]

Yeah, that's why Detroit almost beat them, and had the lead the entire game, gimme a break, they wont even be around for the NFC Championship. We'll be playing in Lambeau against the Giants, you watch.

[4and12to12and4]

I said in a post the day they beat us Im glad they won, go to Packers.com and listen to Favres comments, he says the same thing, all the pressure is on them now, so it could be a good thing that we lost, that game didn't mean shit to us, and has us in the perfect position. We're going to the Bowl for Brett's third hurrrah!!! Who would've thought!!!! I love me some Favre.

[4and12to12and4]

Once again, enen though the gameplan may have included throwing long, Brett shouldn't have thrown into triple coverage Columbo is greatly improved from his Bears days and in regards to Dallas and KGB, Romo lit us up numerous times when KGB wouldn't have been in the game and if he was to be in on second and say4-7, I'd run all day long at him. They missed Woodson more imo but we will struggle with them cause we will have to roll all our coverage to TO and that opens up Whitten. Dallas' weapons on offense really expose our bad S play.

Dude, if we play them healthy, we are more talented then them in every position, period. And i'm sick of this "brett doesn't play well in big games, that's a crock of shit, if not for our shitty defense, Brett would,ve singlehandedly gave up a second ring. We just couldn't stop their run game, and all those other playoff losses were because of our shit defenses, ST, and receivers. If Brett played on the Pats this year, he'd have 60 TD passes by now.

[b bulldog]

Like the 6 pics against the Rams ect. BRETT IS HAVE ONE HELL OF YEAR but too blame it on the D, your better than that. Dallas is better than us. They have only been beaten by the Pats. We were beaten by the lonely bears and the Cowboys. Our Oline had it handed to them in Dallas and our D could never stop them when they needed to.

[3irty1]

Like the 6 pics against the Rams ect. BRETT IS HAVE ONE HELL OF YEAR but too blame it on the D, your better than that. Dallas is better than us. They have only been beaten by the Pats. We were beaten by the lonely bears and the Cowboys. Our Oline had it handed to them in Dallas and our D could never stop them when they needed to.

What's so lonely about the Bears and Cowboys?

[b bulldog]

I think Woodson should be our first DB in the probowl, sorry.

[pbmax]

Bretsky, do you really think the Packers O line is second best in the NFC?

Or did I miss the joke?O

Interesting that the two teams with probably the two best offensive lines in the NFL are currently the two best teams

[MadtownPacker]

Bretsky, do you really think the Packers O line is second best in the NFC?

Or did I miss the joke?O

Interesting that the two teams with probably the two best offensive lines in the NFL are currently the two best teams

I think he was talking about the patriots and dallas.

[MJZiggy]

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was talking about the Pats and Cowboys...

[pbmax]

We've been using play action all year. Its McCarthy's preferred attack, that's why he wanted the Broncos/Falcons ZBS.

The four and five wide shotgun is newer and it has been run alongside play action all year.

The offensive line needs to straighten out its protections. Yes, I am throwing them under the bus. Its possible it was all Colledge, but I am not sure.

On defense they need to dump the zone in the middle and deep. I know Collins and Bigby in coverage might not be the best, but Detroit played a lot of man to man in their game and suddenly the Romo's play action wasn't as effective.

Peter King pointed out they went to a zone in the last couple of drives and Romo took them up and down the field three times late.

[quote="The Leaper"]

He took us away from our strength. Using play-action gives Favre less time to sit back and observe the field, because he has to waste a couple seconds trying to fake a handoff. And we did this SIX TIMES in the first 20 plays.

[pbmax]

Asked and answered, thanks Mad. Sorry Bretsky.

Bretsky, do you really think the Packers O line is second best in the NFC?

Or did I miss the joke?O

Interesting that the two teams with probably the two best offensive lines in the NFL are currently the two best teams

I think he was talking about the patriots and dallas.

[MadtownPacker]

I could be mistaken, but I believe he was talking about the Pats and Cowboys...

Clear visual evidence confirms that MadtownPacker jumped on the ball first. The play stands..