Our current regime will do nothing to pressure the Chinese on something as trivial as the Olympic games considering they have us by the balls financially.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
China Olympics
Collapse
X
-
I know it is unilateral, but WE carry the most weight. We are the big player..militarily, economically...and most importantly..competition in the olympics.Originally posted by Harlan HucklebyIt's not a unilateral action by U.S. It would be broad statement.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsGonna be hard to pressure ANYBODY on human rights reform when we are torturing people. Regardless of your, mine, etc. viewpoint..most of the world deplores our actions in GT, Abu, and our methods.
Boycotting a ceremony is not a big stick. And we already have plenty of engagement and diplomacy.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsAlso, using a big stick against china is the wrong method. Diplomacy is what is needed.
Again, we have great engagement with china already. Lack of communication is not the issue.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsThe way to engage them is opening new lines of communication and reducing the capacity for misunderstanding during times of crisis.
yes! yes!Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsSince the Chinese are big on respect/shame..is this the way to go?
Again, it's a broad boycott, not just the U.S. or another coallition of the willing. China is not going to withdraw from the world. Why do you suppose this Olympics means so much to them? This is a rare and appropriate time to remind China that they will BENEFIT from less authoritarian treatment of their unwilling subjects.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsDo we want to slight them in a way that will cause us major problems?
Plenty of engagment and diplomacy? Are you kidding. Until Fallon engaged them in 05 they were going to be one of our next wars. Fallon ran into major neocon push back.
Shame: Wrong.
Slight them: I'm not talking about just the olympics...i'm talking about what happens afterward. I guess you just wanna play into the chinese hardliner's hands. Yep, let's just give them another excuse.
Not competing will not show them a benefit. It will only show our hypocrisy.
Comment
-
I didn't read the article. Sorry.Originally posted by Harlan HucklebyTB, I think you need to read the article. Nobody is threatening to not compete. The boycott is of part of the opening ceremonies that does not involve athletes.Originally posted by Tyrone BiggunsNot competing will not show them a benefit. It will only show our hypocrisy.
Still don't think boycotting the ceremonies is a good idea. Not going to change anything, and special moment for the athletes.
Comment
-
While I see the point of the boycott, I've come to the conclusion that politics and the Olympics should be kept separate. The Olympics is supposed to be about friendly competition between nations (keyword: SUPPOSED). Why politicize it?"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
Originally posted by Harlan Hucklebythe athletes are prohibited from making political statements.
LOL
Well, ok, Tommie Smith and John Carlos were prohibited. Did it stop them? Is there a more enduring image in the history of the games?
Jesse Owens made his statement just by showing up and not being inferior to Hitler's superior race.
I'm glad those guys didn't boycott the Olympics.
Comment


Comment