Originally posted by GBRulz
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
TAX REBATE CHECKS--Thanks George
Collapse
X
-
Donald...You go girl!Originally posted by JoemailmanWhat do you need a zoom lens for now that Brett is gone?Originally posted by GBRulzI bought a new lens for my camera. Now I just need a practice to attend so I can try out that zoom!!
"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Comment
-
These checks are just another idiotic thing that Congress has done. And another example of penalizing the wealthy for working hard and making their money.
They penalize successful families in two ways:
1. For clearing the 150k threshold of earnings
2. Penalizing families for working hard and putting their kids through college. Financial Aid is set-up in such a manner that a parental contribution is expected, and as a result they can claim you as a dependent and get a good amount of that money back. However, they're still paying to support the person they are getting screwed over in the process.
Stupid, stupid, stupid. Equal rights and fair treatment my ass.
Comment
-
It's never a bad thing when the government gives some of that money back--since they are so friggin' inefficient at spending it."There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
While I agree with the inefficiency, I have to question where this money is coming from?!?Originally posted by HarveyWallbangersIt's never a bad thing when the government gives some of that money back--since they are so friggin' inefficient at spending it.
The budget is already resulting in trillion dollar losses, and that is built around everyone getting a standard tax return. Now give million and millions of families upwards of 1500-2000 back?!? Where is that money coming from?
I don't see a need to keep creating imaginary money and worrying about it later. We never should have left the gold standard.
Comment
-
Hopefully, it means the government will have to spend less to compensate.Originally posted by PartialWhile I agree with the inefficiency, I have to question where this money is coming from?!?"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Comment
-
Because "dependent older than 17" is just a fancy way of saying "free-loader."Originally posted by PartialAnyone know why they are excluding dependents greater than 17 years of age? Seems dumb as those parents are typically paying a good amount of money in tuition.
Comment
-
Or college student.Originally posted by hoosierBecause "dependent older than 17" is just a fancy way of saying "free-loader."Originally posted by PartialAnyone know why they are excluding dependents greater than 17 years of age? Seems dumb as those parents are typically paying a good amount of money in tuition.
The way they have it set-up is really stupid. College students are supposed to be dependents because financial aid has an expected parental contribution.
Comment
-
College students are supposed to be grown people capable of fending for themselves. Most college students enjoy that aspect of actually standing on their own for the first time even if it means eating dirt while living in an overpriced slumlord special. Weird.Originally posted by PartialOr college student.
The way they have it set-up is really stupid. College students are supposed to be dependents because financial aid has an expected parental contribution.
It's nice when parents can help their kids, but expecting it is a little presumptuous for a number of reasons - socially and economically.
That's awesome you're being excluded though."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment



Comment