Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Shoot um up

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Shoot um up

    I'm interested in the threshold where people think it's ok to take a shotgun and blow somebody's head off.

    I've tried to arrange the situations in order of increasing seriousness, so that if you vote for one situation, you'd also vote for the crimes about it. I know its not perfect. So shoot me.
    0
    In self defense of myself and family's safety
    0%
    0
    I see somebody commiting a violent & dangerous crime like armed robbery or rape
    0%
    0
    My own property has been trespassed and I fear my property is threatened
    0%
    0
    I see a large crime against property, such as insider trading
    0%
    0
    I see a small crime against property underway - my neighbor's car being burglarized
    0%
    0
    I see any crime underway
    0%
    0

  • #2
    There are a couple of them where I wouldn't hesitate to shoot somebody. If you can kill a deer, you can kill a person and eat them.

    Comment


    • #3
      Ridiculous. When is it OK for anything 100% of the time? I know you think you're funny, but you're the only one laughing, and you're no Andy Kauffman.
      Originally posted by 3irty1
      This is museum quality stupidity.

      Comment


      • #4
        You forgot "The person is wearing different colors then your gangs".

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by MadtownPacker
          You forgot "The person is wearing different colors then your gangs".
          How many gangs can one person belong to?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Zool
            Ridiculous. When is it OK for anything 100% of the time? I know you think you're funny, but you're the only one laughing, and you're no Andy Kauffman.
            I'm not being funny. Alright, fine, it is hard to sign-on 100% for some of the categories. Then pick a category and explain what criteria the shotgun holder should use in deciding when to fire.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MadtownPacker
              You forgot "The person is wearing different colors then your gangs".
              You are just a Sears MExican and the closest you ever came to a gang was watching Spanky & Our Gang on TV. I can't believe anybody still believes your bullshit. You are no vato loco, girlfriend. ( i learned that word at the same place you learn all your slang talk.)

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                You forgot "The person is wearing different colors then your gangs".
                How many gangs can one person belong to?
                You can have your neighborhood set, followed by the the city affiliations.

                But you know I actually meant "gang's" you sorry bitch.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Blood in Blood out was a good flick.

                  Mad's a pachuco though, not a cholo.
                  Originally posted by 3irty1
                  This is museum quality stupidity.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                    You forgot "The person is wearing different colors then your gangs".
                    You are just a Sears MExican and the closest you ever came to a gang was watching Spanky & Our Gang on TV. I can't believe anybody still believes your bullshit. You are no vato loco, girlfriend. ( i learned that word at the same place you learn all your slang talk.)
                    Shut yer trap your screamin ninny (how do you like my cracka slang you stupid hoe?). A gay ass joto like youself just needs to stay where you are safely able to hunger for young boys without consequence.

                    Im gonna stop by your boarding house room when I go to GB this year and take your TV in front of you since you said you wont do shit about it anyways, fucking panocha.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                      Im gonna stop by your boarding house room when I go to GB this year and take your TV in front of you since you said you wont do shit about it anyways, fucking panocha.
                      Can we start a gang for this? The thought of a mob of packerrats assaulting Harlan's hovel and taking everything that's not nailed down seems like a good idea. It would be cathartic and should only take a minute or two. Maybe we could burn it all in his front yard while chanting "yes we can!"
                      "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by SkinBasket
                        Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                        Im gonna stop by your boarding house room when I go to GB this year and take your TV in front of you since you said you wont do shit about it anyways, fucking panocha.
                        Can we start a gang for this?
                        YES WE CAN!
                        Originally posted by 3irty1
                        This is museum quality stupidity.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by SkinBasket
                          The thought of a mob of packerrats assaulting Harlan's hovel and taking everything that's not nailed down seems like a good idea.

                          I can't imagine what would be worth taking.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Skin's prolly running low on Astro Glide and naked pictures of Danny Terrio
                            Originally posted by 3irty1
                            This is museum quality stupidity.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Can some legal eagle weigh in here. Is insider trading considering a property crime as Harlan suggests?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X