packer rats II

[Rastak]

well, i'm glad that the top 3 problems on this site, those who i think are most responsible for the site becoming very polorized, have spoken up and proven my point

Yea, I'm with you. I know that's funny in it's own right. I have a unique slant so it's not so bad for me, even funny at times but I agree. I'd be pissed. JH is kinda of funny in his insane shifts that hammer home a certain point until he ditches it. Ty is a complete pain in the ass and shows no signs of shutting the fuck up. CK is a guy who likes to piss and moan about a subject he's obviously very passionate and opinionated on.


Scott is cool. HH is nuts but he's funny, at least he used to be rather witty...he now seems kinda bitter.. The pro Favre crowd is understandable, the dude was the face of the team for 16 years.

[GBRulz]

My thoughts mirror what Rastak and Red said, 100%

[texaspackerbacker]

Red didn't say, but I'll be damn disappointed if I didn't make the top three.

Polarization is good; Wimpiness and whininess is not.

[Rastak]

Red didn't say, but I'll be damn disappointed if I didn't make the top three.

Polarization is good; Wimpiness and whininess is not.

Tex, polarization in and of itself isn't an issue. I'll be honest, I think you're nuts but enjoy reading your takes on things. I'm glad you're here.


I think we're talking about a select group of people.....a very small subset who can't seem to shut the fuck up on the attacks. We already know your take (select group I refer too) , do you need to rip the other side every time? You state your point, they state theirs.

[Partial]

My thoughts mirror what Rastak and Red said, 100%

4thed.

[HowardRoark]

My thoughts mirror what Rastak and Red said, 100%

4thed.

5th.......pled.

[Lurker64]

I'm seriously hoping that this place gets better when the season starts and we have more football topics to discuss.

Then again, I'm afraid there'll just be a running count of "#12 vs. #4" on the boards that will insist on being 31 flavors of irritating.

*sigh*

[texaspackerbacker]

Red didn't say, but I'll be damn disappointed if I didn't make the top three.

Polarization is good; Wimpiness and whininess is not.

Tex, polarization in and of itself isn't an issue. I'll be honest, I think you're nuts but enjoy reading your takes on things. I'm glad you're here.


I think we're talking about a select group of people.....a very small subset who can't seem to shut the fuck up on the attacks. We already know your take (select group I refer too) , do you need to rip the other side every time? You state your point, they state theirs.

Thank you ...... I think.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Scott is cool. HH is nuts but he's funny, at least he used to be rather witty...he now seems kinda bitter.. The pro Favre crowd is understandable, the dude was the face of the team for 16 years.

fuck you. the bitterness has been 90% from the pro-Favre bitter enders. They are "understandable" to you because you side with their point of view. And why did you decide to start name-calling? Do you claim to be above it all?

I'm bitter only towards Madtown, because he has used his censorship tools in a one-sided fashion, against opinions that criticize FAvre or Favre fans. That does bug me. His justification that the discussions were "non-football" is simply untrue, at least in several instances. If there is some official policy against name-calling, fine, publish it and enforce it uniformly.

[Rastak]

Scott is cool. HH is nuts but he's funny, at least he used to be rather witty...he now seems kinda bitter.. The pro Favre crowd is understandable, the dude was the face of the team for 16 years.

fuck you. the bitterness has been 90% from the pro-Favre bitter enders. They are "understandable" to you because you side with their point of view. And why did you decide to start name-calling? Do you claim to be above it all?

I'm bitter only towards Madtown, because he has used his censorship tools in a one-sided fashion, against opinions that criticize FAvre or Favre fans. That does bug me. His justification that the discussions were "non-football" is simply untrue, at least in several instances. If there is some official policy against name-calling, fine, publish it and enforce it uniformly.

You were once funny, now you are a bitter dude. From the average poster's perspective, why care why you are? It is what it is.

[rdanomly]

Where has Patler been? He has a wonderful habit of bringing a healthy dose of sanity to a discussion.

[SkinBasket]

4thed.

When I find you, I'm going to fuck you in the ass.

[Scott Campbell]

4thed.

When I find you, I'm going to fuck you in the ass.

Love is in the air........

[Bretsky]

Scott is cool. HH is nuts but he's funny, at least he used to be rather witty...he now seems kinda bitter.. The pro Favre crowd is understandable, the dude was the face of the team for 16 years.

fuck you. the bitterness has been 90% from the pro-Favre bitter enders. They are "understandable" to you because you side with their point of view. And why did you decide to start name-calling? Do you claim to be above it all?

I'm bitter only towards Madtown, because he has used his censorship tools in a one-sided fashion, against opinions that criticize FAvre or Favre fans. That does bug me. His justification that the discussions were "non-football" is simply untrue, at least in several instances. If there is some official policy against name-calling, fine, publish it and enforce it uniformly.

You were once funny, now you are a bitter dude. From the average poster's perspective, why care why you are? It is what it is.

HH was never funny in the first place

[Deputy Nutz]

Harlan changed in the pregnancy thread. That was the thread where Skinbasket came out of his shell and took all the humor for himself and let Harlan lay in a crumpled ruin.