Racist Act at Oregon Christian College

[mraynrand]

Ah, my myopic friend, the bible ain't the new testament...so, the quote says nothing about Christianity.

Thanks for proving my point. the Bible is the Old Testement and the New Testement put together.

Do we need to go over the Trinity again tonight?

For you..but, the quote is mine..and therefore I get to determine how i use it.

More importantly, who the fuck takes a South Park quote seriously?

apparently you do, since it is in your tag line

[mraynrand]

What is my position on Christianity? I'd be curious to know.

You don't understand it.

Maybe i don't because i keep getting bogged down in the inconsistencies tween all the gospels.

Because you don't understand it.

Right. Get back to me after you've read all the stuff that didn't make your Western Canon at the Council of Trent...just a mere 12 centuries later.

I'm back.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

We have? What is my position on Christianity? I'd be curious to know..

"The bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"

Ah, my myopic friend, the bible ain't the new testament...so, the quote says nothing about Christianity.

Very funny, since the reference is from South Park, right? referring to Spock saying the line (in reference to his sacrifice for the Entgerprise): "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one (not Obama)." That refers back to In the Luke 9:24 from the King James Bible (note 'Bible' includes the New Testament) where it is written: “For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.” Now, of course, South Park has it all twisted around of course, but your quote refers directly to the New Testament of the Bible.

Nope. That isn't what the quote was about.

It was simply about lessons that can be learned. Doesn't matter if they come from the Bible or Wrath of Khan.

[mraynrand]

We have? What is my position on Christianity? I'd be curious to know..

"The bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"

Ah, my myopic friend, the bible ain't the new testament...so, the quote says nothing about Christianity.

Very funny, since the reference is from South Park, right? referring to Spock saying the line (in reference to his sacrifice for the Entgerprise): "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one (not Obama)." That refers back to In the Luke 9:24 from the King James Bible (note 'Bible' includes the New Testament) where it is written: “For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.” Now, of course, South Park has it all twisted around of course, but your quote refers directly to the New Testament of the Bible.

Nope. That isn't what the quote was about.

It was simply about lessons that can be learned. Doesn't matter if they come from the Bible or Wrath of Khan.

I rest my case

[Tyrone Bigguns]

We have? What is my position on Christianity? I'd be curious to know..

"The bible, Wrath of Khan, what's the difference?"

Ah, my myopic friend, the bible ain't the new testament...so, the quote says nothing about Christianity.

Very funny, since the reference is from South Park, right? referring to Spock saying the line (in reference to his sacrifice for the Entgerprise): "The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or the one (not Obama)." That refers back to In the Luke 9:24 from the King James Bible (note 'Bible' includes the New Testament) where it is written: “For whosoever will save his life shall lose it: but whosoever will lose his life for my sake, the same shall save it.” Now, of course, South Park has it all twisted around of course, but your quote refers directly to the New Testament of the Bible.

Nope. That isn't what the quote was about.

It was simply about lessons that can be learned. Doesn't matter if they come from the Bible or Wrath of Khan.

I rest my case

Which makes me glad you aren't an attorney.

As stated, the bible isn't the new testament. So, your whole point that my quote reflects upon Christianity is up in smoke.

[HowardRoark]

As stated, the bible isn't the new testament. So, your whole point that my quote reflects upon Christianity is up in smoke.

So, whatever you say is true in this little world of ours....is that the deal? What exactly is the Bible?

BTW, are you using drugs tonight?

[Tyrone Bigguns]

As stated, the bible isn't the new testament. So, your whole point that my quote reflects upon Christianity is up in smoke.

So, whatever you say is true in this little world of ours....is that the deal? What exactly is the Bible?

BTW, are you using drugs tonight?

You are free to use the old and new. That is your right and what you believe.

However, i don't believe in the new testament nor do i call it the bible. And, that should be fine for you as well...with the understanding that you should want to enlighten me, show me the way, and convert me. Hopefully, not to intrusively.

My point is simply, that is is my quote and i have the right to define how i use it. The quote had nothing to do with Christianity.

Drugs: No. Why? You got some you want to share?

[texaspackerbacker]

What a load of BS, Tex. Just because I no longer practice religion does not mean I wasn't trained in it nor does it suggest that I don't understand the way a Christian should be acting. I would expect that at a Christian school, acts of racial intolerance (and it is not the hanging of a political figure, but the racial overtones suggesting the historical hanging during the race riots--quit trying to change the context) would be considered wrong and spoken against (like say a certain dude did with some tax collectors).

I never spoke about the government as this has nothing to do with them. This has to do with societal norms within the Christian community. So you think veiled threats against others is ok for these Christian students. Somehow not the behaviour of the one you yourself suggested they should be emulating.

You have the point of view of an outsider/a detractor/a non-believer. I'm just saying that taints any value judgments you make on the religion, compared to true believers--kind of like non-fans' opinions of the Packers compared to those of us who really are true fans. You are like the Bob McGinn of Christianity.

Racial overtones/racial intolerance, these are merely CONVENIENT perceptions pushed by liberals who can't stand the concept that thieir pet candidate is so eminently HATEABLE--completely aside from his race. Do you have any evidence whatsoever--written racial epithets, for example--that there is anything racial here? Or is it merely the damned Obamaphiles whining because their piece of crap hero got disrespected?

And how do you extrapolate "veiled threats"? Undoubtedly hate for scum like Obama IS the norm in a Christian community like that--because, as I said, the guy is so eminently hateable.

The only thing I remember writing about government was the Render Unto Caesar stuff--which was a pre-emptive strike in case you or any other lefty had any thought of trying to justify some anti-war or soft on crime crap. Liberals/atheists/whatever tend to do that, you know.

[Zool]

Ahh nothing like a race debate to bring out the duh in people.

Pissing contest...isle 3.

A reading from the book of System of a Down seems to fit here again.

"My cock is much bigger than yours,
My cock can walk right through the door
With a feeling so pure..
It's got you screaming back for more."

Praise be to SOAD.

[texaspackerbacker]

Ahh nothing like a race debate to bring out the duh in people.

Pissing contest...isle 3.

A reading from the book of System of a Down seems to fit here again.

"My cock is much bigger than yours,
My cock can walk right through the door
With a feeling so pure..
It's got you screaming back for more."

Praise be to SOAD.

Ah, but it's NOT a race debate. The lefties are just trying to make it one to divert from the idea that people in a decent Christian community find Obama so hateable for so many other reasons.

[MJZiggy]

What a load of BS, Tex. Just because I no longer practice religion does not mean I wasn't trained in it nor does it suggest that I don't understand the way a Christian should be acting. I would expect that at a Christian school, acts of racial intolerance (and it is not the hanging of a political figure, but the racial overtones suggesting the historical hanging during the race riots--quit trying to change the context) would be considered wrong and spoken against (like say a certain dude did with some tax collectors).

I never spoke about the government as this has nothing to do with them. This has to do with societal norms within the Christian community. So you think veiled threats against others is ok for these Christian students. Somehow not the behaviour of the one you yourself suggested they should be emulating.

You have the point of view of an outsider/a detractor/a non-believer. I'm just saying that taints any value judgments you make on the religion, compared to true believers--kind of like non-fans' opinions of the Packers compared to those of us who really are true fans. You are like the Bob McGinn of Christianity.

Racial overtones/racial intolerance, these are merely CONVENIENT perceptions pushed by liberals who can't stand the concept that thieir pet candidate is so eminently HATEABLE--completely aside from his race. Do you have any evidence whatsoever--written racial epithets, for example--that there is anything racial here? Or is it merely the damned Obamaphiles whining because their piece of crap hero got disrespected?

And how do you extrapolate "veiled threats"? Undoubtedly hate for scum like Obama IS the norm in a Christian community like that--because, as I said, the guy is so eminently hateable.

The only thing I remember writing about government was the Render Unto Caesar stuff--which was a pre-emptive strike in case you or any other lefty had any thought of trying to justify some anti-war or soft on crime crap. Liberals/atheists/whatever tend to do that, you know.

I also don't have the point of view of someone who celebrates the sudden and tragic death of a well respected professional whose only sin was asking questions of people in a way you didn't like. Your religious cred is completely shot.

Because I don't show up at a building with a cross on it on Sunday morning doesn't mean I think any differently than when I did and it doesn't mean that those who do show up and scream their religion the loudest believe any more than I do. Doesn't mean they treat their fellow humans any better either which you yourself have proven.

No one is discussing war or the government here, so let's quit trying to twist this away from what it is about, namely the behavior of one or more individuals in a specific situation in a specific community.