Tweet
Sometimes they swing one way; Sometimes they swing the other--kinda like most of our forum leftists, I think.
For the most part, Obama has been slightly on top as a whole--was there ever a doubt he was the top ass a hole.
Anyway, my point is this: We have two extremely extenuating factors that paint a much brighter picture for McCain.
One of these is the well known "Bradley Effect"--the concept that a lot of white folks will SAY that they are voting for the black guy, but when it comes right down to it, there's no way in hell they're voting for the black guy. And if it worked that way for Tom Bradley, who was a tough law and order guy that even I might have voted for as California governor, how much more will it be that way for a SNIVELING WIMP--Erkel-type like Obama (kudos to Justin Harrell for coining that Sniveling--or Sniffling--Wimp term).
The other factor I just thought of--straight from me, no credit to Rush or Hannity or anybody. Just the same, I doubt anybody can dispute the logic of it. It is a kind of REVERSE Bradley Effect with regard to women--Sarah Palin in particular--and it's a two-fold effect. How many women are going to tell pollsters "I'm voting for the candidate with the woman on the ticket"? Damn few! Yet how many of those women will like the idea of a woman progressing to that level that they will go ahead and vote for McCain/Palin? At least a few percent more than what tell the pollsters, I would guess. And you can add to that a percentage of Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc. blue collar union workers, conservative in their views, but pressured to vote Dem/lib by their union leaders. They also would be unlikely to TELL the pollsters that they are voting for McCain because they like what his female VP stands for. However, when it comes time to vote, at least some will do just that.
I hesitate to post this because I like the idea of forum leftists having false hope, and then getting shot down on election day--AGAIN--just like 2000 and 2004. Also, I sort of leave myself open for the same thing. The simple fact is, though, I JUST CAN'T SEE THE GOOD NORMAL COMMON SENSE AMERICAN VOTERS ELECTING AN ANTI-AMERICAN ANTI-CHRISTIAN ANTI-FREE ENTERPRISE PIECE OF CRAP LIKE OBAMA!
For the most part, Obama has been slightly on top as a whole--was there ever a doubt he was the top ass a hole.
Anyway, my point is this: We have two extremely extenuating factors that paint a much brighter picture for McCain.
One of these is the well known "Bradley Effect"--the concept that a lot of white folks will SAY that they are voting for the black guy, but when it comes right down to it, there's no way in hell they're voting for the black guy. And if it worked that way for Tom Bradley, who was a tough law and order guy that even I might have voted for as California governor, how much more will it be that way for a SNIVELING WIMP--Erkel-type like Obama (kudos to Justin Harrell for coining that Sniveling--or Sniffling--Wimp term).
The other factor I just thought of--straight from me, no credit to Rush or Hannity or anybody. Just the same, I doubt anybody can dispute the logic of it. It is a kind of REVERSE Bradley Effect with regard to women--Sarah Palin in particular--and it's a two-fold effect. How many women are going to tell pollsters "I'm voting for the candidate with the woman on the ticket"? Damn few! Yet how many of those women will like the idea of a woman progressing to that level that they will go ahead and vote for McCain/Palin? At least a few percent more than what tell the pollsters, I would guess. And you can add to that a percentage of Ohio, Pennsylvania, etc. blue collar union workers, conservative in their views, but pressured to vote Dem/lib by their union leaders. They also would be unlikely to TELL the pollsters that they are voting for McCain because they like what his female VP stands for. However, when it comes time to vote, at least some will do just that.
I hesitate to post this because I like the idea of forum leftists having false hope, and then getting shot down on election day--AGAIN--just like 2000 and 2004. Also, I sort of leave myself open for the same thing. The simple fact is, though, I JUST CAN'T SEE THE GOOD NORMAL COMMON SENSE AMERICAN VOTERS ELECTING AN ANTI-AMERICAN ANTI-CHRISTIAN ANTI-FREE ENTERPRISE PIECE OF CRAP LIKE OBAMA!
Comment