Obama and Me

[mraynrand]

I think Obama should give a bunch of that money to McCain. C'mon it's only fair.

Why didn't McCain just print some money for use in his campaign? Would have helped his efforts and stimulated the economy thanks to the good old Multiplier.

[LL2]

I think Obama should give a bunch of that money to McCain. C'mon it's only fair.

Now, that would be "spreading the wealth."

[texaspackerbacker]

He's gonna be on CBS, NBC, and Fox. I wonder why he is shunning ABC.

It's a toss-up between Obama and Pushing Daisies. I suppose I'll record Pushing Daisies. Obama's damn lucky he ain't going up against Dirty Sexy Money. Nobody would watch him.

He's gonna delay the World Series a half hour? That's real swift!

Go for it, Barak. Let's hope you are arrigant enough to promote your true views and positions. Every time those get exposed, he loses votes, as he is so damn far out of tune with good normal Americans.

[Freak Out]

Who the fuck is running his campaign? What they should do with all the loot they have is sponsor barbecues or chili feeds all across the country to help feed the hungry instead of crap like this. Most people have decided who they are voting for by now. Heartless fuckers.

That could play out pretty badly, as it would surely get spun by the Repubs as vote buying.

I guess I should have put the eyes rolling emoticon at the end...sorry. I thought the "heartless fuckers" would have given it away. It is probably illegal anyway.

[hoosier]

Who the fuck is running his campaign? What they should do with all the loot they have is sponsor barbecues or chili feeds all across the country to help feed the hungry instead of crap like this. Most people have decided who they are voting for by now. Heartless fuckers.

That could play out pretty badly, as it would surely get spun by the Repubs as vote buying.

I guess I should have put the eyes rolling emoticon at the end...sorry. I thought the "heartless fuckers" would have given it away. It is probably illegal anyway.

Actually heartless fuckers is what sold me in the first place. I figured you were the kind of guy who wouldn't shy away from criticizing the home team on occasion.

[hoosier]

He's gonna be on CBS, NBC, and Fox. I wonder why he is shunning ABC.

It's a toss-up between Obama and Pushing Daisies. I suppose I'll record Pushing Daisies. Obama's damn lucky he ain't going up against Dirty Sexy Money. Nobody would watch him.

He's gonna delay the World Series a half hour? That's real swift!

Go for it, Barak. Let's hope you are arrigant enough to promote your true views and positions. Every time those get exposed, he loses votes, as he is so damn far out of tune with good normal Americans.

Oops. The anal speller made a boo boo. :P

[texaspackerbacker]

He's gonna be on CBS, NBC, and Fox. I wonder why he is shunning ABC.

It's a toss-up between Obama and Pushing Daisies. I suppose I'll record Pushing Daisies. Obama's damn lucky he ain't going up against Dirty Sexy Money. Nobody would watch him.

He's gonna delay the World Series a half hour? That's real swift!

Go for it, Barak. Let's hope you are arrigant enough to promote your true views and positions. Every time those get exposed, he loses votes, as he is so damn far out of tune with good normal Americans.

Oops. The anal speller made a boo boo. :P

I am, indeed, embarrassed. It was, however, my old fingers at fault, not my old brain--A TYPO.

[digitaldean]

He's gonna be on CBS, NBC, and Fox. I wonder why he is shunning ABC.

ABC had planned to charge slightly more than $1 million for the half hour, a higher rate than what Fox, CBS and NBC charged the Democrat for their time. But it was too late and the Obama campaign opted out of ABC.

The following WILL be covering it.
FOX (delays World Series )
MSNBC
NBC
CBS
Univision
BET
TV One

[HowardRoark]

Oh goody, goody....He's on!!!!!

[HowardRoark]

[MJZiggy]

Perot did the exact same thing in 92. He's been slammed for months by an extremely negative attack campaign. He has the money. It just ain't that big a deal, boys.

[texaspackerbacker]

How is bringing up the guy's record (or lack of it) as well as his own words (as few as there have been on substance) considered "negative campaigning"?

Just because liberals want/need to hide that sort of thing doesn't make exposing it "negative".

[MJZiggy]

You can't see the McCain is running a very negative campaign? Let me ask you this--BASED ON WHAT HE'S PRESENTED IN HIS ADS, what is McCain planning to actually do once in office? Can you link me a single ad that gives me any of that information? I bet you'd have an easier time finding one that hints at him being Muslim without saying it outright...didn't he have a habit for a while of calling Obama by his middle name?

[texaspackerbacker]

You can't see the McCain is running a very negative campaign? Let me ask you this--BASED ON WHAT HE'S PRESENTED IN HIS ADS, what is McCain planning to actually do once in office? Can you link me a single ad that gives me any of that information? I bet you'd have an easier time finding one that hints at him being Muslim without saying it outright...didn't he have a habit for a while of calling Obama by his middle name?

You didn't answer the question: How is it "negative campaigning" to bring up the guy's RECORD of voting and public statements--even if those things are so detrimental to Obama?

As for what McCain would do:

First and foremost, he will continue what has been 100% successful in preventing repeats of 9/11--including successfully completing the nation-building stage of the war in Iraq. Everything else pales to insignificance in comparison to that.

Secondly, I would like to say McCain would get the Bush tax cuts renewed and get additional cuts passed. That, however, is very unlikely, considering the rotten Dem/lib super-majority in Congress. McCain would, however, veto any tax increases other than the expiration of the Bush cuts--which, unfortunately doesn't require an affirmative vote.

Thirdly, I suppose you don't want to hear about obstruction of bad programs, but McCain would also veto any leftist take over of the health care system. There's no point in even outlining McCain's program, because it would be DOA at the Dem-controlled Congress. No problem, though, because there's really nothing wrong with what we have right now.

Fourth, McCain is committed to building The Fence. I'm not 100% sure, but I think that has already passed, and would require an affirmative vote in Congress--which McCain could veto--to derail it.

Fifth, McCain would appoint judges who would follow the Constitution, rather than try to skew and override it through leftist judicial activism.

There are probably other specifics, but that's enough for now.

Despite the incessant leftist propaganda to the contrary, the status quo is pretty damn good in this country. CHANGE, on the other hand, is almost as dirty a word as liberalism--and as promoted by Obama, would NECESSARILY be CHANGE in a downward direction.

[MJZiggy]

You can't see the McCain is running a very negative campaign? Let me ask you this--BASED ON WHAT HE'S PRESENTED IN HIS ADS, what is McCain planning to actually do once in office? Can you link me a single ad that gives me any of that information? I bet you'd have an easier time finding one that hints at him being Muslim without saying it outright...didn't he have a habit for a while of calling Obama by his middle name?

You didn't answer the question: How is it "negative campaigning" to bring up the guy's RECORD of voting and public statements--even if those things are so detrimental to Obama?

As for what McCain would do:

First and foremost, he will continue what has been 100% successful in preventing repeats of 9/11--including successfully completing the nation-building stage of the war in Iraq. Everything else pales to insignificance in comparison to that.

Secondly, I would like to say McCain would get the Bush tax cuts renewed and get additional cuts passed. That, however, is very unlikely, considering the rotten Dem/lib super-majority in Congress. McCain would, however, veto any tax increases other than the expiration of the Bush cuts--which, unfortunately doesn't require an affirmative vote.

Thirdly, I suppose you don't want to hear about obstruction of bad programs, but McCain would also veto any leftist take over of the health care system. There's no point in even outlining McCain's program, because it would be DOA at the Dem-controlled Congress. No problem, though, because there's really nothing wrong with what we have right now.

Fourth, McCain is committed to building The Fence. I'm not 100% sure, but I think that has already passed, and would require an affirmative vote in Congress--which McCain could veto--to derail it.

Fifth, McCain would appoint judges who would follow the Constitution, rather than try to skew and override it through leftist judicial activism.

There are probably other specifics, but that's enough for now.

Despite the incessant leftist propaganda to the contrary, the status quo is pretty damn good in this country. CHANGE, on the other hand, is almost as dirty a word as liberalism--and as promoted by Obama, would NECESSARILY be CHANGE in a downward direction.

I said from his ads. I haven't seen a bit of what you've said in his ads, so how would I know if you're telling the truth? Come to think of it, he hasn't said much about what he'd do during the debates between trying to accuse Obama of this or that and make snide remarks about him not understanding things...I have NO idea what he intends to change (except spending taxpayer money to buy out bad mortgages).

And he does keep telling us that he's not like Bush and things will change, he just neglects to tell us HOW they will change. And I'm not talking about how YOU say he will do things. I want to know when in his actual campaign he ever told you those things.