Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bobby Jindal in 2012
Collapse
X
-
No mate, I am not prone to gobbling up media crap. I tend to form my own opinions. Obviously, Iceland doesn't go bankrupt if the world economy doesn't go tits up. But the seem to be and so, I must renig on that statement.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerYeah, Tarlam, I've heard that line too--those two countries and whatever others are better off than America. Aside from the very valid point Howard brought up about Iceland going bankrupt, you are buying into the propaganda the America-hating left and their media allies are spewing.
Well, if you call ZERO unemployment or poverty any type of standard of living, I would say, USA loses. Until Iceland bankrupt, that was the case. I've been to both places and you can really take it from me, the people there have a far higher standard of living than you do, on average. Indeed, australians compare quite well to you, also.Regardless of what statistical deception they can come up with, it is totally beyond comprehension that the standard of living and lifestyle in those two or ANY country could be anywhere near our own, all things considered. You've spent time here and in Europe. Would you honestly say people live as good over there as here?
I'm in now way denying anybody freedom of speech. I just pointed out that, as an outsider, I find it a little early to condemn P-E Obama and start cheering for his successor when he hasn't even taken office yet. If I am an American, I shut my gob until February and see if he's the same dude.Just the same, what do you see as so wrong about expressing the firm well-thought-out expectation--based on what obama himself states his plans and policies are--that he will SCREW UP THE COUNTRY AND VERY POSSIBLY, THE WORLD? Over here, at least, we still have freedom of speech--another thing Obama intends to restrict (check out the Fairness Doctrine).
Comment
-
Re: Bobby Jindal in 2012
WHAT??Originally posted by texaspackerbackerHe is young and attractive--which apparently means a lot these days; .
Now, first off, this isn't gay. I am comfortable enough in my sexuality to talk about other men.
Second, he is not attractive. He is small, skinny, and looks like a NYC cab driver. There is nothing physically appealing about this guy.Check out my mock draft at
Comment
-
I think you are confusing your black and/or brown skinned men.Originally posted by MJZiggyMichelle begs to differ. I think he's fairly handsome.
yes we can
After lunch the players lounged about the hotel patio watching the surf fling white plumes high against the darkening sky. Clouds were piling up in the west… Vince Lombardi frowned.
Comment
-
Re: Bobby Jindal in 2012
This isn't really a discussion I want to get into. My point was that the nation has been conditioned to think crap like attractiveness is important in a politician.Originally posted by Kyle.McCarrollWHAT??Originally posted by texaspackerbackerHe is young and attractive--which apparently means a lot these days; .
Now, first off, this isn't gay. I am comfortable enough in my sexuality to talk about other men.
Second, he is not attractive. He is small, skinny, and looks like a NYC cab driver. There is nothing physically appealing about this guy.
As for Jindal looking good or not, I'll give you a big "whatever" on that. I honestly never took a very good look at him. Maybe you are right. However, when the electorate gets so infatuated with a God damned Steve Erkel look alike, the standard can't be all that high.
You'd have a lot more credibility in your attractiveness comments if you folowed them up by saying something "nevertheless, the substance of Jindal's conservative positions is outstanding". If you're just typical leftist hatemonger, that's another story.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Re: Bobby Jindal in 2012
So, if I would have shared some kind of political opinion with that post, my taste in men would be more credible?Originally posted by texaspackerbackerThis isn't really a discussion I want to get into. My point was that the nation has been conditioned to think crap like attractiveness is important in a politician.Originally posted by Kyle.McCarrollWHAT??Originally posted by texaspackerbackerHe is young and attractive--which apparently means a lot these days; .
Now, first off, this isn't gay. I am comfortable enough in my sexuality to talk about other men.
Second, he is not attractive. He is small, skinny, and looks like a NYC cab driver. There is nothing physically appealing about this guy.
As for Jindal looking good or not, I'll give you a big "whatever" on that. I honestly never took a very good look at him. Maybe you are right. However, when the electorate gets so infatuated with a God damned Steve Erkel look alike, the standard can't be all that high.
You'd have a lot more credibility in your attractiveness comments if you folowed them up by saying something "nevertheless, the substance of Jindal's conservative positions is outstanding". If you're just typical leftist hatemonger, that's another story.
The fact that I didn't make some sort of a comment is because I do not know enough about Gov. Jindal to make an intelligent one. Nevertheless, I would vote for Jindal over Obama if that election was held tomorrow. I'm sure that tells you all you need to know about my political affiliations.Check out my mock draft at
Comment
-
News flash...when you commit federal crimes you lose certain protections under the constitution.Originally posted by th87Psycho Jindal makes Palin look like Pelosi. Authorized physical castration of sex offenders (this is unconstitutional).
Nobody outside of Dixie will take this guy seriously.The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment
-
Except the old "cruel and unusual punishment" thing.Originally posted by bobbleheadNews flash...when you commit federal crimes you lose certain protections under the constitution.Originally posted by th87Psycho Jindal makes Palin look like Pelosi. Authorized physical castration of sex offenders (this is unconstitutional).
Nobody outside of Dixie will take this guy seriously.
Comment
-
Seems like I used the same response line in your post over in the Packer forum.Originally posted by th87Except the old "cruel and unusual punishment" thing.Originally posted by bobbleheadNews flash...when you commit federal crimes you lose certain protections under the constitution.Originally posted by th87Psycho Jindal makes Palin look like Pelosi. Authorized physical castration of sex offenders (this is unconstitutional).
Nobody outside of Dixie will take this guy seriously.
I agree with you, but I'm not so sure that's a good thing.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Re: Bobby Jindal in 2012
Thank you, Kyle. I thought I remembered that you as a decent conservative , but I just wasn't sure. What's with this "taste in men" stuff? You aren't one of those "log cabin" guys, are you?Originally posted by Kyle.McCarrollSo, if I would have shared some kind of political opinion with that post, my taste in men would be more credible?Originally posted by texaspackerbackerThis isn't really a discussion I want to get into. My point was that the nation has been conditioned to think crap like attractiveness is important in a politician.Originally posted by Kyle.McCarrollWHAT??Originally posted by texaspackerbackerHe is young and attractive--which apparently means a lot these days; .
Now, first off, this isn't gay. I am comfortable enough in my sexuality to talk about other men.
Second, he is not attractive. He is small, skinny, and looks like a NYC cab driver. There is nothing physically appealing about this guy.
As for Jindal looking good or not, I'll give you a big "whatever" on that. I honestly never took a very good look at him. Maybe you are right. However, when the electorate gets so infatuated with a God damned Steve Erkel look alike, the standard can't be all that high.
You'd have a lot more credibility in your attractiveness comments if you folowed them up by saying something "nevertheless, the substance of Jindal's conservative positions is outstanding". If you're just typical leftist hatemonger, that's another story.
The fact that I didn't make some sort of a comment is because I do not know enough about Gov. Jindal to make an intelligent one. Nevertheless, I would vote for Jindal over Obama if that election was held tomorrow. I'm sure that tells you all you need to know about my political affiliations.What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
Comment
-
Re: Bobby Jindal in 2012
Just "screwing" around.Originally posted by texaspackerbackerThank you, Kyle. I thought I remembered that you as a decent conservative , but I just wasn't sure. What's with this "taste in men" stuff? You aren't one of those "log cabin" guys, are you?
Check out my mock draft at
Comment


Comment