Homosexuality

[packinpatland]

How is it you condone same sex ass-fucking and teaching kids in school it's OK?

Because teaching kids to be tolerant of others' personal choices and to not discriminate is important.

Limited to exactly what you just said, I'm with you on that.

I hope you realize, you could be severely chastized by other supporters of homosexuality who can't stand the idea that homosexuality is a choice the practicers make.

When those little elementary school kids ask what exactly it is you are telling them to be tolerant of, and you detail what exactly goes into de tail, and they go "eeeeooooowwwww", what are you gonna say? Are you gonna try to claim it's a "natural" behavior? Good luck with that.

Those same little elementary school kids would have given exactly the same "eeeeooooowwwww", if a detailed explaination of heterosexual sex had been given.

[HowardRoark]

She should have stated her opinion and been open to a meaningful dialogue that may have persued.

Where exactly would that happen? Are you starting to see the light a little. You guys are the tyrants.

[packinpatland]

Now, the use of the word tyrant.........do you mean that in the modern sense, or the classical ?

[HowardRoark]

Now, the use of the word tyrant.........do you mean that in the modern sense, or the classical ?

Classic.

[texaspackerbacker]

How is it you condone same sex ass-fucking and teaching kids in school it's OK?

Because teaching kids to be tolerant of others' personal choices and to not discriminate is important.

Limited to exactly what you just said, I'm with you on that.

I hope you realize, you could be severely chastized by other supporters of homosexuality who can't stand the idea that homosexuality is a choice the practicers make.

When those little elementary school kids ask what exactly it is you are telling them to be tolerant of, and you detail what exactly goes into de tail, and they go "eeeeooooowwwww", what are you gonna say? Are you gonna try to claim it's a "natural" behavior? Good luck with that.

Those same little elementary school kids would have given exactly the same "eeeeooooowwwww", if a detailed explaination of heterosexual sex had been given.

Somehow, I doubt that.

Kids have a keen sense of what's natural and normal, and what isn't. THAT is why there is so much persecution of homosexuals in schools--NOT because of parental influence or any crap like that.

Supporters of homosexuality like to divert discussions to religion, and most of us on the side of good don't shy away from that diversion, as our religion as well as pretty much everybody else's religion in the world consders homosexuality an abomination. However, the fact is, the real reason that abomination is so matter-of-factly reviled has nothing to do with religion. It is because homosexuality--in the eyes of the huge majority of people, INCLUDING kids who have never been propagandized either for or against it--is seen as unnatural/gross/disgusting.

Anybody sitting there reading this who thinks otherwise is either totally out of touch or so brainwashed by their own extreme liberal propaganda that they deny reality.

The reason these purveyors of the gay agenda have to go through the contortions Swede described above is exactly BECAUSE the crap they are pushing is SO UNNATURAL.

[Zool]

Who the fuck is a supporter of homosexuality except for gay people? This is where your argument turns from pointless to dumb. People support other peoples right to live how they want. I'm not marching in a parade or flying a pink triangle in my truck, but if 2 lesbians want to bump uglies so be it.

[texaspackerbacker]

Who the fuck is a supporter of homosexuality except for gay people? This is where your argument turns from pointless to dumb. People support other peoples right to live how they want. I'm not marching in a parade or flying a pink triangle in my truck, but if 2 lesbians want to bump uglies so be it.

Have you been reading the posts of your fellow lefties (oh, I forgot, you don't admit to being one of them EITHER). What would you call consistently defending homosexual behavior, as well as the agenda of teaching and preaching that it is a morally equivalent if you don't want to call that "supporting" homosexuality?

Hell, even I watch lesbian porn, and even I wouldn't advocate going back to outlawing fags from practicing their abomination in private. However, that is hugely different than what your leftist cohorts are spewing--promotion of homosexuality as MORALLY EQUIVALENT to normal heterosexual behavior.

Which side of THAT fence are you on, Zool? Or are you gonna sit on it?

[Zool]

Have you been reading the posts of your fellow lefties (oh, I forgot, you don't admit to being one of them EITHER). What would you call consistently defending homosexual behavior, as well as the agenda of teaching and preaching that it is a morally equivalent if you don't want to call that "supporting" homosexuality?

Hell, even I watch lesbian porn, and even I wouldn't advocate going back to outlawing fags from practicing their abomination in private. However, that is hugely different than what your leftist cohorts are spewing--promotion of homosexuality as MORALLY EQUIVALENT to normal heterosexual behavior.

Which side of THAT fence are you on, Zool? Or are you gonna sit on it?

Well I'll be damned if I'm going to identify with a group that feels they are the moral and just hammer of God to be swung at all non-believers.

Defending a man or womans right to being a homosexual has nothing to do with supporting them specifically. It's their right to be that way as a human being and thats the only thing I'll support. Otherwise, like you and your ilk say repeatedly, where does it end? If I like a specific style of shoes and you don't, do I have to stop wearing them?

Your argument is that homosexuality is going to somehow ruin society. I think teaching kids to think poorly of another person who's different than they are is a shitty thing to do. I don't agree that homosexuality is some sort of choice. Some people are just wired that way. Have you looked at other dudes? Do you honestly think that a straight dude looks at a guy and goes "fuck I think today I'm going to be gay". Women....possibly, but thats neither here nor there.

Be gay, be straight, I dont really care. I guess I'm glad I'm on the side thats socially acceptable but I won't condemn someone for who they are and how they live. I think that's someone else's job and I don't mean you.

[Partial]

Zool you fag.

[MateoInMex]

Who the fuck is a supporter of homosexuality except for gay people? This is where your argument turns from pointless to dumb. People support other peoples right to live how they want. I'm not marching in a parade or flying a pink triangle in my truck, but if 2 lesbians want to bump uglies so be it.

Have you been reading the posts of your fellow lefties (oh, I forgot, you don't admit to being one of them EITHER). What would you call consistently defending homosexual behavior, as well as the agenda of teaching and preaching that it is a morally equivalent if you don't want to call that "supporting" homosexuality?

Hell, even I watch lesbian porn, and even I wouldn't advocate going back to outlawing fags from practicing their abomination in private. However, that is hugely different than what your leftist cohorts are spewing--promotion of homosexuality as MORALLY EQUIVALENT to normal heterosexual behavior.

Which side of THAT fence are you on, Zool? Or are you gonna sit on it?

You prove time and time again that you're a hypocrite Rexnozzle. You'll watch 2 gay chicks engage in sexual behavior, but the thought of two guys fucking is either too disgusting, or it could be that you might enjoy it and hate to admit it. Whatever floats your boat dude.

I think you're more frightened that the thought of homosexuality as an alternative lifestyle will have you, your kids, and every student in elementary school running to the caves in hills with candles ready to practice this "new religion."

I was raised Catholic and I could give a fuck less about "my religion" smack, because I believe the Bible is a fairytale and Catholic priests have been known to diddle little boys. Not me, thankfully.

You mention the act of two dudes taking it in the tail, and the thought of that being taught in school is gross. I actually laughed at that..but unless it's a three-some of 3 guys or 2 guys and a girl, two guys can't take it in the tail, unless one is giving himself a reach around.

And personally, I'm not an ass-freak, so even the thought of heterosexual anal is a little too risque for me.

As my friend Doug Stanhope has said on Stern and virtually his career...being a sick pig, how can he not be a proponent of anal sex.

"CUz I don't wanna meet a BK BROILER ON THE WAY OUT!"

[Zool]

Zool you fag.

You'd sex me up and you know it. I'm a hot piece of ass.

[texaspackerbacker]

Have you been reading the posts of your fellow lefties (oh, I forgot, you don't admit to being one of them EITHER). What would you call consistently defending homosexual behavior, as well as the agenda of teaching and preaching that it is a morally equivalent if you don't want to call that "supporting" homosexuality?

Hell, even I watch lesbian porn, and even I wouldn't advocate going back to outlawing fags from practicing their abomination in private. However, that is hugely different than what your leftist cohorts are spewing--promotion of homosexuality as MORALLY EQUIVALENT to normal heterosexual behavior.

Which side of THAT fence are you on, Zool? Or are you gonna sit on it?

Well I'll be damned if I'm going to identify with a group that feels they are the moral and just hammer of God to be swung at all non-believers.

Defending a man or womans right to being a homosexual has nothing to do with supporting them specifically. It's their right to be that way as a human being and thats the only thing I'll support. Otherwise, like you and your ilk say repeatedly, where does it end? If I like a specific style of shoes and you don't, do I have to stop wearing them?

Your argument is that homosexuality is going to somehow ruin society. I think teaching kids to think poorly of another person who's different than they are is a shitty thing to do. I don't agree that homosexuality is some sort of choice. Some people are just wired that way. Have you looked at other dudes? Do you honestly think that a straight dude looks at a guy and goes "fuck I think today I'm going to be gay". Women....possibly, but thats neither here nor there.

Be gay, be straight, I dont really care. I guess I'm glad I'm on the side thats socially acceptable but I won't condemn someone for who they are and how they live. I think that's someone else's job and I don't mean you.

I say AGAIN, the issue is NOT the right of fags to practice their abominable behavior. I'm conceding that.

The issue is that they--and more specifically, leftists who may or may not be fags themselves--getting all evangelical about it and trying to spread their abomination--trying to pass off the sick behavior they choose as no different qualitatively than normal heterosexual behavior.

Now you're back to the liberal line of crap that homosexuality is NOT a choice? A few posts back, you were talking about how it was a choice.

I also say AGAIN, nobody is talking about "teaching kids to think poorly .....". Best case would be to leave the who discussion out of the curriculum. But if it does need to get talked about in the name of sex ed or whatever, then simply teach that it is and has been throughout history a behavior that is considered abhorrent and disgusting by virtually every religion and culture--just that fact, no value judgment one way or the other. Would that be good enough for you? Or are you somehow committed to passing off same sex ass fucking as normal or OK?

Mateo, it seems like we have discussed this double standard thing before. Hell yeah, there is a difference between lesbian sex and male fags getting it on. The male/male thing is considered an abomination NOT ONLY by our religion, but by virtually EVERY religion and culture on the face of the earth. The lesbian thing is condemned to a much lesser extent, and not at all (that I know of) in the Bible.

And if you and others want to disparage the Bible and/or any other religious teachings, fine, this is America--you have the right (I'm not sure about Mexico). However, I say this AGAIN too, it ain't about religion. It is about the will of the majority a.k.a. democracy. Sure, go ahead and protect the minority by not outlawing practice of their abomination in private, but do NOT promote the abomination as something that is acceptable behavior, contrary to the will of the majority--as leftists are so prone to do.

[hoosier]

Social norms in Mexico are a little different, where gay sex isn't seen as a single entity. The passive partner in a relation gets nothing but scorn and ridicule, while the active one is often revered as a macho, a chingón. Being a chingón is a good thing regardless of where you like to stick it. A bottom, however, is the lowest of the low.

[texaspackerbacker]

Social norms in Mexico are a little different, where gay sex isn't seen as a single entity. The passive partner in a relation gets nothing but scorn and ridicule, while the active one is often revered as a macho, a chingón. Being a chingón is a good thing regardless of where you like to stick it. A bottom, however, is the lowest of the low.

Sounds like the voice of experience. I always suspected you liberals were receptive to more than just new ideas.

[hoosier]

Whatever you say, Mr. Wide Stance. :P