Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Criticism of John Walsh/America's Most Wanted

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Criticism of John Walsh/America's Most Wanted

    In an announcement, Hollywood (Florida) police finally close the investigation into 6 year-old Adam Walsh's death in 1981. This occasion naturally highlights all the good work that John Walsh, Adam's father, has done for missing and exploited children since his son went missing.

    John Walsh is a survivor, a positive role model, an American hero....but then read the criticism of him by an obvious left-wing, academic pinhead that the AP writer just feels the need to include.

    Why include the pure BS at the end?

    .................................................. ..................................................

    "For all that went wrong in the probe, the case contributed to massive advances in police searches for missing youngsters and a notable shift in the view parents and children hold of the world.

    Adam's death, and his father's activism on his behalf, helped put faces on milk cartons, shopping bags and mailbox flyers, started fingerprinting programs and increased security at schools and stores. It spurred the creation of missing persons units at every large police department.

    "In 1981, when a child disappeared, you couldn't enter information about a child into the FBI database. You could enter information about stolen cars, stolen guns but not stolen children," said Ernie Allen, president of the Center for Missing and Exploited Children, co-founded by John Walsh. "Those things have all changed."

    It also prompted national legislation to create a national center, database and toll-free line devoted to missing children, and led to the start of "America's Most Wanted," which brought those cases into millions of homes.

    What it also did, said Mount Holyoke College sociologist and criminologist Richard Moran, is make children and adults alike exponentially more afraid;

    "He ended up really producing a generation of cautious and afraid kids who view all adults and strangers as a threat to them and it made parents extremely paranoid about the safety of their children," Moran said."


  • #2
    yeah, it would be better if kids grew up stupid and didn't know there was anything to fear until they were in a bag in the back of a van

    Comment


    • #3
      My god, you are either really dense or just so biased that you can't help yourself.

      The writer clearly sets up the effects of a botched probe into Adam's death.

      For all that went wrong in the probe, the case contributed to massive advances in police searches for missing youngsters and a notable shift in the view parents and children hold of the world.
      If you care to disagree with that statement, please present some evidence to the contrary.

      Comment


      • #4
        I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
          I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
          In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

          But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
            I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
            In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

            But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
            Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kiwon
              Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
              In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

              But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
              Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )
              You don't think parents are more wary nowadays? You don't think that kids are taught to be wary of strangers?

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                Originally posted by Kiwon
                Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
                In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

                But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
                Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )
                You don't think parents are more wary nowadays? You don't think that kids are taught to be wary of strangers?
                You don't think that John Walsh and "America's Most Wanted" has done enormous good?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Kiwon
                  Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                  Originally posted by Kiwon
                  Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                  Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                  I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
                  In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

                  But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
                  Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )
                  You don't think parents are more wary nowadays? You don't think that kids are taught to be wary of strangers?
                  You don't think that John Walsh and "America's Most Wanted" has done enormous good?
                  Did i or the article suggest that he didn't do enormous good?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                    Originally posted by Kiwon
                    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                    Originally posted by Kiwon
                    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
                    In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

                    But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
                    Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )
                    You don't think parents are more wary nowadays? You don't think that kids are taught to be wary of strangers?
                    You don't think that John Walsh and "America's Most Wanted" has done enormous good?
                    Did i or the article suggest that he didn't do enormous good?
                    Do the last two sentences not suggest the effect has been negative in that regard? By inference it is a criticism.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                      I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
                      Maybe because the journalist is trying to point out that shows like Walsh's have contributed to sensationalizing crime and to making us fearful of the unknown. There's a difference between being savvy around strangers and being afraid that anyone who looks like they don't belong in the neighborhood is really an axe murderer. And the journalist is arguing that Walsh's show contributes to erasing that distinction, while at the same time turning other people's suffering into entertainment (that's my take, not the author's).

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Criticism of John Walsh/America's Most Wanted

                        Originally posted by Kiwon
                        John Walsh is a survivor, a positive role model, an American hero....but then read the criticism of him by an obvious left-wing, academic pinhead that the AP writer just feels the need to include.

                        Why include the pure BS at the end?
                        Just more name calling by you Kiwon. It is good that the Walsh family gets to put at least a part of the horrible story to rest but you of course take your criticism of a part of the article to extremes. I don't agree with what Moran said but there is no reason so start the typical name calling "liberal" bashing.
                        C.H.U.D.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Criticism of John Walsh/America's Most Wanted

                          Originally posted by Freak Out
                          Just more name calling by you Kiwon.
                          I tend to agree with this also. Kiwon would have been better off just stating that he didn't feel the last two sentences were pertinent. Still, I don't think they needed to "balance out" the story with the quote from the esteemed sociology professor from Mount Holyoke Colledge.
                          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Patler
                            Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                            Originally posted by Kiwon
                            Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                            Originally posted by Kiwon
                            Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
                            Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                            I agree with Kiwon. Why even post the last two sentences?
                            In order to buttress the position that children and parent's view of the world has changed.

                            But, remind me again why Walsh is above criticism?
                            Do you agree with the comments by Richard Moran (or Moron...any relation to you? )
                            You don't think parents are more wary nowadays? You don't think that kids are taught to be wary of strangers?
                            You don't think that John Walsh and "America's Most Wanted" has done enormous good?
                            Did i or the article suggest that he didn't do enormous good?
                            Do the last two sentences not suggest the effect has been negative in that regard? By inference it is a criticism.
                            Well, that would depend on how you view things. If being more afraid keeps us safe isn't that good? Or, is it bad?

                            In the end, it is quite valid to present all the good things that have come from Adam's death as well as some of the negative. After all, Mr. Walsh isn't just a talking head, he is the producer of America's Most Wanted. He is in Television..and Television and the way it presents things is certainly not above criticism.

                            If the article delved into his personal life..for example, Mr. Walsh was known for his womanizing ways and his wife did reconcile after filing..well, that would certainly be out of place in that article.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Criticism of John Walsh/America's Most Wanted

                              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                              Originally posted by Freak Out
                              Just more name calling by you Kiwon.
                              I tend to agree with this also. Kiwon would have been better off just stating that he didn't feel the last two sentences were pertinent. Still, I don't think they needed to "balance out" the story with the quote from the esteemed sociology professor from Mount Holyoke Colledge.
                              There seems to be some sort of potshots being taken on Dr. Moran. Dr. Moran is a well known expert in criminology.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X