If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
I think that if there's a reduction in trauma, it would be due to the robotic instruments being able to work within a smaller incision than would be necessary using more traditional methods (fingers). The impact of that difference depends on where they're cutting. The more muscle they'd have to cut through to get at what needs fixing, the more of a difference it would make. I also think it can't hurt to have everything enlarged and put on a screen in front of the doctor (especially if he needs new glasses.)
"Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings
Supposed to enhanced precision and reduced trauma.
Anything good or bad to say about it?
An honest answer...this is the future of surgery. As I have said many times you can count on machines to be more consistent and error free in most tasks (take counting ballots for example). If you consider that no surgeon can do laser eye surgery without the assistance of a machine than you will understand that an autonomous machine will be more precise, accurate and stable doing most surgeries.
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Supposed to enhanced precision and reduced trauma.
Anything good or bad to say about it?
An honest answer...this is the future of surgery. As I have said many times you can count on machines to be more consistent and error free in most tasks (take counting ballots for example). If you consider that no surgeon can do laser eye surgery without the assistance of a machine than you will understand that an autonomous machine will be more precise, accurate and stable doing most surgeries.
Most surgeries? Not even close at this point, but I see what you mean. The serious answer is that there are no autonomous surgeries, just robotically assisted stuff. In many cases, the robotic assisted stuff is waste of money at this time. It depends on the particular operation. 007, what specifically are you thinking about? (PM me if you have a detailed concern and I can get you some good advice).
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Supposed to enhanced precision and reduced trauma.
Anything good or bad to say about it?
An honest answer...this is the future of surgery. As I have said many times you can count on machines to be more consistent and error free in most tasks (take counting ballots for example). If you consider that no surgeon can do laser eye surgery without the assistance of a machine than you will understand that an autonomous machine will be more precise, accurate and stable doing most surgeries.
Most surgeries? Not even close at this point, but I see what you mean. The serious answer is that there are no autonomous surgeries, just robotically assisted stuff. In many cases, the robotic assisted stuff is waste of money at this time. It depends on the particular operation. 007, what specifically are you thinking about? (PM me if you have a detailed concern and I can get you some good advice).
I said this is the future, most surgeries, not yet, but not so far off.
The only time success comes before work is in the dictionary -- Vince Lombardi
Comment