Conservatives and Ann Coulter

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least. She is her own worst enemy.

All evidence to the contrary.

What evidence?

[mraynrand]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least. She is her own worst enemy.

All evidence to the contrary.

What evidence?

5 posts and counting on this thread already from a lib - including a single source paper that you either wrote yourself or borrowed from Media Matters. Game, Set, Match Mr. deductive. I await one ounce of inductive reasoning from your lib brain.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least. She is her own worst enemy.

All evidence to the contrary.

What evidence?

5 posts and counting on this thread already from a lib - including a single source paper that you either wrote yourself or borrowed from Media Matters. Game, Set, Match Mr. deductive. I await one ounce of inductive reasoning from your lib brain.

Posts in responses to queries..like the one from Sheep.

But, to conflate post with worry is dubious at best.

Source: Are you denying the accuracy? Nope. Not from media matters..but, i like how you try to portray them as a non critical source. More importantly, i was asked for factual information on lies. That is what i provided. Why don't you refute my facts.

Inductive: You might wanna brush up on that, slick. It is pretty inductive to say that she lied in the two examples given...therefore she lies all the time.

[Kiwon]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least.

Why would we be worried about her. Didn't we just win the white house..despite her foaming at the mouth.

[MadtownPacker]

Thats an ugly ass White bitch!

What do you know? You need to expand your horizons beyond latina porn.

You remember how in all the old skool movies that where on an island or in the jungle and the natives always where in awe of the blond goddess that came with the White men? Coulter is such an ugly hag they would throw her in the stew pot or something shit like that cuz they damn sure would not want to screw her.

[mraynrand]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least. She is her own worst enemy.

All evidence to the contrary.

What evidence?

5 posts and counting on this thread already from a lib - including a single source paper that you either wrote yourself or borrowed from Media Matters. Game, Set, Match Mr. deductive. I await one ounce of inductive reasoning from your lib brain.

Posts in responses to queries..like the one from Sheep.

But, to conflate post with worry is dubious at best.

Source: Are you denying the accuracy? Nope. Not from media matters..but, i like how you try to portray them as a non critical source. More importantly, i was asked for factual information on lies. That is what i provided. Why don't you refute my facts.

Inductive: You might wanna brush up on that, slick. It is pretty inductive to say that she lied in the two examples given...therefore she lies all the time.

Inductive: You'll figure it out eventually. And, you're up to seven post now. But you don't care.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least. She is her own worst enemy.

All evidence to the contrary.

What evidence?

5 posts and counting on this thread already from a lib - including a single source paper that you either wrote yourself or borrowed from Media Matters. Game, Set, Match Mr. deductive. I await one ounce of inductive reasoning from your lib brain.

Posts in responses to queries..like the one from Sheep.

But, to conflate post with worry is dubious at best.

Source: Are you denying the accuracy? Nope. Not from media matters..but, i like how you try to portray them as a non critical source. More importantly, i was asked for factual information on lies. That is what i provided. Why don't you refute my facts.

Inductive: You might wanna brush up on that, slick. It is pretty inductive to say that she lied in the two examples given...therefore she lies all the time.

Inductive: You'll figure it out eventually. And, you're up to seven post now. But you don't care.

Yep, i really do care. What is she doing today, where is she, what did she eat, who is she dating.

Please help me out.

[MadtownPacker]

Why are you stupid MFers ruining this thread? Lets talk about that bitch.

Tell you the truth, I like her attitude but she needs to be fine to act like that.

[bobblehead]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least.

Why would we be worried about her. Didn't we just win the white house..despite her foaming at the mouth.

In fairness she said she would vote for hillary before mccain...its not like she was foaming support for old johnny boy.

[Kiwon]

Re: Conservatives and Ann Coulter

I get that some conservatives dislike her mannerisms and biting sarcasm. But why is there a solid core of folks on the right that seem to outright dismiss her without really thinking about what she has to say, much of which is rather profound?

Forget the liberals afflicted with Ann Coulter-derangement syndrome. Their intolerance is obvious.

But take some conservatives’ reaction to Ann's points about illegitimacy and a woman's responsibility, for instance. They are logical, very non-PC by today's standards, but very logical.

Liberals and conservatives both have tried to refrain from using the word "illegitimate" in recent decades to describe children born out of wedlock and Ann's arguments try to return the social stigma to it. It seems that some conservatives want to promote the need for strong families without addressing the other side of the equation (i.e., that it is irresponsible to engage in casual sex and run the risk of producing an unwanted child and that having a child out of wedlock is certainly less than ideal and even harmful to the child, the mother, the father, and to society).

She backs up her assertions with facts and research. And yet, some conservatives tend to focus upon the way she says things rather than the facts that she is highlighting and end up missing the whole point altogether.

My beef isn't with the Libs; they have the traditional ideal of family squarely in their sights and won't stop until it's completely destroyed. My problem is with conservatives that won't listen to the message because of who the messenger is.

Ann Coulter's style may be provocative and sometimes over the top, but she's jarring people awake and making them face some unpleasant realities regarding personal responsibility. It goes against what mainstream culture is teaching us but that's the whole point.

The American culture is in a moral tailspin (as borne out from the statistics) and it's up to each sensible person to help take the controls and help straighten it out before it crashes.

She blames the Left and it's radical agendas, of course. They don't want to hear the message, but apparently some on the Right don't want to either. This is what I don't understand.

[mraynrand]

Clearly Ann is inflicting her standards on others. She should be more forgiving and tolerant, and not seek revenge towards those who violate her standards. We each have our own set of standards with which we can be very happy, and others should never stand in judgment of what we do or say.

"Why can't we just get along?"

"Each of us puts his person and all his power in common under the supreme direction of the general will, and, in our corporate capacity, we receive each member as an indivisible part of the whole."

[bobblehead]

I defer to what I always say. I won't judge anyones behavior until it negatively affects me. i.e. I don't care how many baby daddys you have until you think its my responsibility to pay for them.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least.

Why would we be worried about her. Didn't we just win the white house..despite her foaming at the mouth.

In fairness she said she would vote for hillary before mccain...its not like she was foaming support for old johnny boy.

You are in Vegas. You wanna bet that she voted for Hillary. I'll take that action.

[bobblehead]

Liberals aren't concerned about her in the least.

Why would we be worried about her. Didn't we just win the white house..despite her foaming at the mouth.

In fairness she said she would vote for hillary before mccain...its not like she was foaming support for old johnny boy.

You are in Vegas. You wanna bet that she voted for Hillary. I'll take that action.

I have no idea, but she wrote plenty of articles slamming McCain. That is a fact. So saying this election is a failure of HER ideals is kinda disengenuous....or intellectually dishonest as you are fond of saying.