If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Electric Company Kills WW2 Vet for Not Paying Bills
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Stuck in the past? How can you say that?
I'm sure Skin and his gang will figure out a way to blame Bill Clinton for everything.
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Are you really this much of a moron? You brought the whole thing up. get over it. The guy you voted for is porking you into 1937.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Are you really this much of a moron? You brought the whole thing up. get over it. The guy you voted for is porking you into 1937.
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Are you really this much of a moron? You brought the whole thing up. get over it. The guy you voted for is porking you into 1937.
Really? that would make bush hoover. Congrats!!
So you agree with me.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Are you really this much of a moron? You brought the whole thing up. get over it. The guy you voted for is porking you into 1937.
Really? that would make bush hoover. Congrats!!
So you agree with me.
IF the choice is between being the second FDR or the second hoover...i'm firmly in the FDR camp.
I'm trying to understand the right-wing outrage. Why is this guy's death a sign of the "new administration" and not just a result of a local power company's blunder?
I'm still trying to figure out the left-wing outrage over the old administration's perceived responsibility for Katrina instead of the result of state and local blunders.
Oabama obviously hated this guy and wanted him dead. So he used the power company to do it. Horrible.
I see. You still can't see how the Bush Adminstration's incompetence affected people's lives after Katrina, and so you're making a ridiculous analogy to drive home your inability to grasp that point. Thanks for clarifying.
I guess he didn't get that 170 billion to 'em fast enough. Get some treatment for your BDS.
I guess it never really dawned on me until just now how stuck in the past the right is. I mean, the right is always stuck in the past, but in the US today the neoconservative discourse is totally consumed by perceived slights suffered three years ago by an incompetent president. If this isn't evidence of a political ideology in decline, I don't know what is.
Are you really this much of a moron? You brought the whole thing up. get over it. The guy you voted for is porking you into 1937.
Really? that would make bush hoover. Congrats!!
So you agree with me.
IF the choice is between being the second FDR or the second hoover...i'm firmly in the FDR camp.
Perhaps you should rethink your position.
So you're in favor of extending a recession into a depression lasting a decade or more - depending on the possibility of war. 13-22% unemployment as opposed to 6-7%. OK, I get you. Perhaps you want to rethink your position.
"Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
That is subject to interpretation. You can't prove any of your points.
History looks way more kindly on FDR than Hoover.
Gosh, I wonder why that is. I'm sure it couldn't be because historians are leftist in about the same percentage as mainstream media members. Thus, history will also look way more kindly on Clinton than Bush--either one of them.
This is off topic, but that picture of Nancy Pelosi on the previous page, she looks a lot like Nancy Reagan--albeit when Mrs. Reagan was 20 or 30 years older and on a bad day.
What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?
History will look kindly on Nancy Pelosi you right-wing gas bag!
[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment