Should posters using more then one account be banned?

[Little Whiskey]

It would be entertaining to "out" the culprits. And then we could have a bit of fun at their expense.

kinda like tar and feathering!! oh wait some might find that a little too erotic

[woodbuck27]

It would be entertaining to "out" the culprits. And then we could have a bit of fun at their expense.

kinda like tar and feathering!! oh wait some might find that a little too erotic

Hahahaha !

Yea - wondering what Scott is thinking (specifically there) but it is probably better expressed in The Garbage Can.

[mraynrand]

Woodbuck,

My point was that the people who established this forum have the right to set any standards that they see fit. I have the right to say the standards suck, and go to other forums or to accept them and remain. If they want to prevent multiple accounts, that's their right. As I wrote above, I don't see any harm in having multiple accounts, so long as you comply with forum behavior standards. Last year (I think) someone set up an account on JSO as "Dr. John Holmes, MD PhD" and it was fairly amusing. So what would be the harm in allowing something like that on this site?

Finally, what right have the users of the forum to set the standards? None I think. If the forum 'owners' set too rigid of control, they will lose their audience and if they set too loose of controls, they will also lose people (Like the Christian Encourager and JSO sites, respectively). Sure, you can give your two cents about your site preferences, but clearly the site owners have the right to establish standards as they see fit, including banning multiple accounts.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

Last year (I think) someone set up an account on JSO as "Dr. John Holmes, MD PhD" and it was fairly amusing.

Oh yeah, I remember Dr. John Holmes. Funny guy. Havent heard from him since some guy named Forrest Glump started showing up (that was also after tankduke got banned for changing his name, amidst the Packers' 6th or 7th straight losses, to "Ted Thompson, Mother of all Fuck Ups").

Anybody know what happened to Johnny?

[GrnBay007]

Last year (I think) someone set up an account on JSO as "Dr. John Holmes, MD PhD" and it was fairly amusing.

Oh yeah, I remember Dr. John Holmes. Funny guy. Havent heard from him since some guy named Forrest Glump started showing up (that was also after tankduke got banned for changing his name, amidst the Packers' 6th or 7th straight losses, to "Ted Thompson, Mother of all Fuck Ups").

Anybody know what happened to Johnny?

You admitted dr. john holmes was you, didn't you tank?

[Anti-Polar Bear]

You admitted dr. john holmes was you, didn't you tank?

I dont think that is possible. Remember, I was banned for the Ted Thompson name. I think that was the 1st time Harlan ever filed a complaint against me. If I recall correctly, Harlan dislike long names because they were altering the nomal format of that site.

[GrnBay007]

You admitted dr. john holmes was you, didn't you tank?

I dont think that is possible.

yeah, right. Unless you kept a calender to track your names, you probably don't know who you were in each month of 2005 in JSO.

bummer you can't do that here, huh?

[Anti-Polar Bear]

yeah, right. Unless you kept a calender to track your names, you probably don't know who you were in each month of 2005 in JSO.

bummer you can't do that here, huh?

I think the real reason you are against multi-accounts is because you still have everlasting memories of your encounter with "the Voice of Reason." If I recall correctly, Voice and you were arguing madly about who loves Ted Thompson the most. I think the Voice evenutally changed his name to Mary Kate and Ashley, although both were of the same account.

[woodbuck27]

Woodbuck,

My point was that the people who established this forum have the right to set any standards that they see fit. I have the right to say the standards suck, and go to other forums or to accept them and remain. If they want to prevent multiple accounts, that's their right. As I wrote above, I don't see any harm in having multiple accounts, so long as you comply with forum behavior standards. Last year (I think) someone set up an account on JSO as "Dr. John Holmes, MD PhD" and it was fairly amusing. So what would be the harm in allowing something like that on this site?

Finally, what right have the users of the forum to set the standards? None I think. If the forum 'owners' set too rigid of control, they will lose their audience and if they set too loose of controls, they will also lose people (Like the Christian Encourager and JSO sites, respectively). Sure, you can give your two cents about your site preferences, but clearly the site owners have the right to establish standards as they see fit, including banning multiple accounts.

I don't disagree with most that you wrote mraynrand, except the issue of duplicate screennames for one account user.

I feel that can't exist for good as then it can go really wrong.The case where I do see it working. Is when a person applys for another screenname, it's approved by Mad and the Mod's and the screen names of all members here are accessable by checking their personal info.

My membership here is a privalege that excludes my exclusive needs.
Not everyone here I expect, takes that stance.

The thing with me mraynrand, is I'm one of those - fight for the little guy / little person - people, that wants fairness and hate's discrimmination. Also, Power Groups make me really nervous.

I do not appreciate judgementle people with their neurotic and petty needs to be considered, above a little patience. Some have to jump right in there and get in their two cents worth. . . . ALL THE TIME ? Uhhhhh ?!!

I'm against 'the inner Circles' that always exist in time. I'm against backstabbers and those quick to drop on others.

Nice to you, nice to you and thank you and suddenly they fold like a wet tent and screw you in a NY minute.

I have no other means of lobby then this thread at present, and I am not so naive to believe, that my positions will be given anymore weight then your's or anyone else's that acts solely as an individual here.

I have a hunch. LOL - that over the past three days, there has been more PMing. I exclude Mad and the Mod's, in causing the degree of useage to rise.

[GrnBay007]

yeah, right. Unless you kept a calender to track your names, you probably don't know who you were in each month of 2005 in JSO.

bummer you can't do that here, huh?

I think the real reason you are against multi-accounts is because you still have everlasting memories of your encounter with "the Voice of Reason." If I recall correctly, Voice and you were arguing madly about who loves Ted Thompson the most. I think the Voice evenutally changed his name to Mary Kate and Ashley, although both were of the same account.

LOL so you are saying those are two other accounts I argued with you on? Tank, really....we have to stop meeting this way.

[Bretsky]

yeah, right. Unless you kept a calender to track your names, you probably don't know who you were in each month of 2005 in JSO.

bummer you can't do that here, huh?

I think the real reason you are against multi-accounts is because you still have everlasting memories of your encounter with "the Voice of Reason." If I recall correctly, Voice and you were arguing madly about who loves Ted Thompson the most. I think the Voice evenutally changed his name to Mary Kate and Ashley, although both were of the same account.

LOL so you are saying those are two other accounts I argued with you on? Tank, really....we have to stop meeting this way.

No wonder why JS is down to four posts a day outside of FYI; Tank and whoever the hacker was each had about 50 accounts.

[RashanGary]

I see no reason to have multiple names. I like the idea of being able to change the names though. I might want to change mine sometime.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

No wonder why JS is down to four posts a day outside of FYI; Tank and whoever the hacker was each had about 50 accounts.

The difference between me and the hacker (Lawyerjoe), is that I, in the words of GreenDay, I mean mraynrand, set out to amuse the audience. The hacker on the other hand, sought out to expose others personal info. Big difference. Never put me in the same sentence with the hacker again.

[Anti-Polar Bear]

LOL so you are saying those are two other accounts I argued with you on? Tank, really....we have to stop meeting this way.

Please, if I am going to ask a mature women out, it will be GBMichele. I want no part of another man's kids. None. No way jose.

[GrnBay007]

LOL so you are saying those are two other accounts I argued with you on? Tank, really....we have to stop meeting this way.

Please, if I am going to ask a mature women out, it will be GBMichele. I want no part of another man's kids. None. No way jose.

You are probably right....if you got out of line my 10 year old son would kick your ass!!!!! lmao