Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Dear Nutz
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Postlook up "abject" in the dictionaryWhat's your point? Other than the fact that you were completely and totally wrong about every supposition and assumption you made. I find the word to describe your delusions almost to perfection.utterly hopeless, miserable, humiliating, or wretched
I'm not sure what you thought it meant, but I'm guessing you were wrong about that too."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
a lot of people misuse abject to mean "completely" or "extremely", which I suspect was your intention. It's a little ridiculous to say that my opinion on Zimmerman's bad behavior is wretched and mired in misery. But if that was your intention, it's kinda funny, and I salute you.
I realize you are defending Zimmerman in reaction to the bad liberals who attacked him, but you have lost your mind if you really approve of Zimmerman's behavior.
Perhaps if he had stalked the skinny black teen with one of those assault rifles you favor, the kid never would have gotten close enough to have that skuffle.
Comment
-
20round clipOriginally posted by SkinBasket View PostI was pretty sure there's larger magazines. What are the results of your capable search?Last edited by Deputy Nutz; 05-18-2012, 10:35 AM.
Comment
-
Dear Skin,
Question: Who would win in a fair fight...Nutz or Tarlam!
Question Two: What if it were an unfair fight?
Question Three: Could an inebriation factor work for or against either one of them?[QUOTE=George Cumby] ...every draft (Ted) would pick a solid, dependable, smart, athletically limited linebacker...the guy who isn't doing drugs, going to strip bars, knocking around his girlfriend or making any plays of game changing significance.
Comment
-
Your utterly hopeless rejection of reality is still marvelous.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View Posta lot of people misuse abject to mean "completely" or "extremely", which I suspect was your intention. It's a little ridiculous to say that my opinion on Zimmerman's bad behavior is wretched and mired in misery. But if that was your intention, it's kinda funny, and I salute you.
Some of us simply see all the facts in the case, not just the one that work for one version of the media narrative that was formed months before even a fraction of the facts where known. For further discussion, stop being retarded and reread the thread on this that clearly shows just how terribly wrong you were about all of it.Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostI realize you are defending Zimmerman in reaction to the bad liberals who attacked him, but you have lost your mind if you really approve of Zimmerman's behavior.
Define "assault." Because a lot of people misuse the word to describe rifles that are black and scarey when they have no other education about firearms to rely on so they make ignorant assumptions about the interned use of said rifle with sociopolitical adjectives like "assault."Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby View PostPerhaps if he had stalked the skinny black teen with one of those assault rifles you favor, the kid never would have gotten close enough to have that skuffle."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
1. Unfortunately nutz. He knows wrestling, which gives him the ability to win 98% of fights against the rest of us by simply being able to knock us down, land on top of us, and well, by then the fight is all but over. Apparently, training for years in sexually questionable unitards has it's benefits.Originally posted by swede View PostDear Skin,
Question: Who would win in a fair fight...Nutz or Tarlam!
Question Two: What if it were an unfair fight?
Question Three: Could an inebriation factor work for or against either one of them?
2. nutz does't fight fair to start with, so your question is invalid. He will, for instance, blind side you with a a karate chop to the liver when you're just trying to hand him a lighter and looking the other way. Or knock your chair over backwards in a strip club. For instance.
3. Well, nutz does become morose and immoble when you combine the right foods and alcohol, so I suppose it could. I just don't know if Tarlam would be ungentlemanly enough to attack nutz while he rolled around on the ground complaining about the half a bucket of KFC he just ate in under 5 minutes."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
The basic facts of the case have hardly changed from day 1. Skinnerman loaded his handgun and stalked a "suspicious" black teen as he walked across many blocks. He ignored requests from 911 operator to backoff.Originally posted by SkinBasket View PostSome of us simply see all the facts in the case, not just the one that work for one version of the media narrative that was formed months before even a fraction of the facts where known. For further discussion, stop being retarded and reread the thread on this that clearly shows just how terribly wrong you were about all of it.
There was a scuffle that is impossible to understand, ending with Skinnerman shooting the kid.
I doubt there will be any conviction. Skinnerman is at best a reckless moron. Same as it ever was.
Comment
-
Now that we are back on guns, I am at a pass, should I buy a .223 or a .308? The .308 would double as a big game hunting rifle while the .223 ammo is cheaper. If I bought the .308 I could sell my browning BAR, it is old and has some issues and needs replacing now before I can't get anything for it. I am also of the faith that you should never sell a BAR.
Comment


Comment