For their endless lobbying and abuse of the 2nd amandment. For their crimes against humanity.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
FUCK THE NRA !!!
Collapse
X
-
Promoting gun safety and security are just propagendas of the NRA. They have been promoting gun saftety for years and people still kill each others with guns. Security? Ask youself this, who pays cops their salaries? None other than the John Q Taxpayer.Originally posted by Dr. NutzI agree screw people that actually out right own their guns, and promote gun safety and security.
The real of motive behind the NRA is to keep the outdated right to bear arm 2nd amandment entact. That amandment was put into the constitution during or after the Revolutionary War. That war is over 4 scores and 7 years ago, or the such. Time changed.
Do the research. Guns kill people. Bullets killed John Lennon.
Comment
-
You are right. His group indirectly killed John Lennon, as well as millions of other innocent Americans, and therefore he indirectly killed Lennon. Without the NRAs lobbying activities. the right to freely bear arm would be outlawed or strictly limited, and Chapman wouldnt be able to buy the gun that killed Lennon.
edited
Comment
-
Asking this question is as pointless as sticking my dick in the toaster, but here goes:Originally posted by Anti-Polar BearPromoting gun safety and security are just propagendas of the NRA. They have been promoting gun saftety for years and people still kill each others with guns.
Tank, maybe you could tell us what percentage of those people killed by guns were killed by members of the NRA?
You sure it wasn't that cocksucking butterfly flapping its wings?Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bearand therefore he indirectly killed Lennon. Without the NRAs lobbying activities. the right to freely bear arm would be outlawed or strictly limited, and Chapman wouldnt be able to buy the gun that killed Lennon."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
Repost for skinbasket:
You are right. His group indirectly killed John Lennon, as well as millions of other innocent Americans, and therefore he indirectly killed Lennon. Without the NRAs lobbying activities. the right to freely bear arm would be outlawed or strictly limited, and Chapman wouldnt be able to buy the gun that killed Lennon.
edited :cool
Comment
-
no he woudl have just stolen the weapon that killed him you fricken idiot. While you are at it taking away rights based on the consitution lets get rid of free speach. What do ya think?
Seriously you are a moron. Come out of your drug induced haze for five minutes and live in the real world.Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
Sometimes I think you are Texaspackerbacker, but not as smart.Originally posted by Tony Odayno he woudl have just stolen the weapon that killed him you fricken idiot. While you are at it taking away rights based on the consitution lets get rid of free speach. What do ya think?
Seriously you are a moron. Come out of your drug induced haze for five minutes and live in the real world.
Comment
-
Totally agree, the right to defend ourselves is a fundamental as the right for free speech, the right to be innocent till proven guilt and others. Just because people are killed by these weapons (mostly by people who haven't taken the NRA endorsed classes) you can't outlaw them. Lets outlaw cars because there are so many deaths attributed to them. I don't have children yet, but ifI ever walked into a room in the future and saw an intuder and my family in grave danger, i would not hesitate one second to give that bastard a one-way ticket to hell.Originally posted by Tony Odayno he woudl have just stolen the weapon that killed him you fricken idiot. While you are at it taking away rights based on the consitution lets get rid of free speach. What do ya think?
Seriously you are a moron. Come out of your drug induced haze for five minutes and live in the real world.
Comment
-
you are a funny little kid. you try to act intelligent but when someone refutes your point you resort to copy and pasting someone else's ideas or insults.
You must be a liberal! well it makes sense now
Swede: My expertise in this area is extensive. The essential difference between a "battleship" and an "aircraft carrier" is that an aircraft carrier requires five direct hits to sink, but it takes only four direct hits to sink a battleship.
Comment
-
Repost for tank:
Asking this question is as pointless as sticking my dick in the toaster, but here goes:Originally posted by Anti-Polar BearPromoting gun safety and security are just propagendas of the NRA. They have been promoting gun saftety for years and people still kill each others with guns.
Tank, maybe you could tell us what percentage of those people killed by guns were killed by members of the NRA?
You sure it wasn't that cocksucking butterfly flapping its wings?Originally posted by Anti-Polar Bearand therefore he indirectly killed Lennon. Without the NRAs lobbying activities. the right to freely bear arm would be outlawed or strictly limited, and Chapman wouldnt be able to buy the gun that killed Lennon.
********************
Come on, my nuts are getting hot."You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial
Comment
-
The amazing statistic that no one will ever admit to is that before guns were invented, no humans were ever killed. Can you believe that? Just look in the record books - it's there for all to see. No human was ever killed prior to the invention of the gun. Also, in the history of the world, no one has ever violated any law. It's amazing! Once mankind makes a law, it is unswervingly followed, without exception.
Therefore, if guns are simply outlawed, no one will have guns, and no one will be killed."Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck
Comment

Comment