Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

banning

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • banning

    I accept the decision to keep the packer forum nicey nice.

    Why not just revoke people's ability to post in the Packer forum if they are being too divisive. That does the job with minimum of sterilizing. The banned people add positive value to the forum despite their irritating moments.

  • #2
    Re: banning

    Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
    I accept the decision to keep the packer forum nicey nice.

    Why not just revoke people's ability to post in the Packer forum if they are being too divisive. That does the job with minimum of sterilizing. The banned people add positive value to the forum despite their irritating moments.
    Good post, however I note that you and I can no longer post in the Packer thread. Coincidence?
    "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

    Comment


    • #3
      This idea is less dumb than most of Harlan's. Instead of making the Garbage Can a privilege, make it a punishment...
      "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

      Comment


      • #4
        Let Freedom ring!
        C.H.U.D.

        Comment


        • #5
          Harlan, it is time you either shut your fucking mouth, or you man up your little testies and start your own forum where you can make up any rules you would like.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: banning

            Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
            I accept the decision to keep the packer forum nicey nice.

            Why not just revoke people's ability to post in the Packer forum if they are being too divisive. That does the job with minimum of sterilizing. The banned people add positive value to the forum despite their irritating moments.
            Not a bad idea, but what happens when a football conversation breaks out in fyi?
            Baah

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: banning

              Originally posted by gex
              Not a bad idea, but what happens when a football conversation breaks out in fyi?
              FYI is just a handfull of misfits who talk mostly to themselves. A couple trouble makers cursing about Favre will pass unnoticed.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: banning

                Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                Originally posted by gex
                Not a bad idea, but what happens when a football conversation breaks out in fyi?
                FYI is just a handfull of misfits who talk mostly to themselves. A couple trouble makers cursing about Favre will pass unnoticed.
                Oh, I'll never fit in!!




                Let's be independent together!
                "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: banning

                  Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                  I accept the decision to keep the packer forum nicey nice.

                  Why not just revoke people's ability to post in the Packer forum if they are being too divisive. That does the job with minimum of sterilizing. The banned people add positive value to the forum despite their irritating moments.

                  So you want them neutered upon reinstatement?

                  I think it's either all in, or all out.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Deputy Nutz
                    Harlan, it is time you either shut your fucking mouth, or you man up your little testies and start your own forum where you can make up any rules you would like.

                    He tried that once and look what happened.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I guess I missed all or at least most of the stuff that got these guys the boot.

                      Partial: Name calling in threads and having/using a duplicate account?

                      JH: Being a drunk obnoxious ass a few to many times?

                      Bigguns: Being a sober obnoxious ass?

                      Cornholio: Who is Cornholio?

                      CPK: I Have no guess.....Favre rabble rousing?

                      It doesn't really matter....I'm just curious what I missed.....maybe I missed nothing and was just used to the chaos that was normal around here.
                      C.H.U.D.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: banning

                        Originally posted by Harlan Huckleby
                        I accept the decision to keep the packer forum nicey nice.

                        Why not just revoke people's ability to post in the Packer forum if they are being too divisive. That does the job with minimum of sterilizing. The banned people add positive value to the forum despite their irritating moments.
                        Better idea get a couple of moderators and let them ...well moderate. You post a useless hate spewing post..boom it's gone.
                        But hey it's the administrators right to keep it clean and lean so to speak. More power to him !

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Freak Out
                          I guess I missed all or at least most of the stuff that got these guys the boot.

                          Partial: Name calling in threads and having/using a duplicate account?

                          JH: Being a drunk obnoxious ass a few to many times?

                          Bigguns: Being a sober obnoxious ass?

                          Cornholio: Who is Cornholio?

                          CPK: I Have no guess.....Favre rabble rousing?

                          It doesn't really matter....I'm just curious what I missed.....maybe I missed nothing and was just used to the chaos that was normal around here.
                          I don't think you missed much, you pretty much nailed it except I'm not sure if JH is getting hammered or is nuts. I fear the latter to be honest.

                          (Sorry Hoosier, I'm off the Packer page so I thought I could comment).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Wait, Partial had another account here? I missed that one.
                            All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I admit I've only been lurking mostly of late. And not as often as I'd like to boot.

                              I can't really get my head around this new ownership deal. I think the Mexican Bandit is still running the show behind the nom de plume Administrator.

                              Back on topic: What SC said.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X