Happy Dance!

[Cheesehead Craig]

You wanna settle things Woody, then just PM the people you have issues with. There you have a one on one and nobody else is jumping in. I don't see why you need a whole separate room to deal with someone.

[Deputy Nutz]

Bad Idea.

[hoosier]

You wanna settle things Woody, then just PM the people you have issues with. There you have a one on one and nobody else is jumping in. I don't see why you need a whole separate room to deal with someone.

Cuz even though it's "mano a mano" it still requires an audience. It's theater, after all.

[MadtownPacker]

When you insults someone's family or expose someone's personal life you cross the line here at Packerrats. Why is that so fucking hard to understand?

7 pages of muck and this gem finally appears.

For those who don't like what happen please know I am unhappy with it as well. But I did what was needed.

[Scott Campbell]

Cuz even though it's "mano a mano" it still requires an audience. It's theater, after all.

At one point I thought he was going to challenge me to a dance off.

[mraynrand]

At one point I thought he was going to challenge me to a dance off.

It could be worse:

[MJZiggy]

Woodbuck 27;

Asking for an executive summary does not impugn the readability of your work, just the length of it. In fact, you provided an executive summary of sorts in your response to HowardRoark immediately preceding your response to MJZiggy. Funny thing is, HR seems to have questioned the readability of your post more than MJZ did, yet you gave HR a summary and chastised MJZ. Why is that? A bit of misogyny perhaps?


Insisting that any of us read it implies that the value of your post is so great that we should all take the time to read it, regardless. That type of judgement should come from others who have ready it, not from you, the author.

In all honesty, I skip over many of your posts primarily because of length, sometimes also due to readability. But I can sympathize with you, because I would skip over many of mine too, when they get as long as some do. I suspect many people do skip many of mine for that very reason.

(I only have an hour for lunch...) I read everything Patler writes as well.

[SkinBasket]

More like Barney Frank of Middlesex County rules

I LOLed.

[SkinBasket]

That post is clear and comprehensively siupported.

That is the funniest thing I've read since the Richard Simmons biography.

[SkinBasket]

only the Skinbasket has enough time on his hands for that

Oh! Forgive me for being the educated motherfucker in the room! Would you rather that I said things like "I'm gonna pound sand up your ass?" and demand you stop pigeon holeing me? Or maybe start. It does sound kind of interesting, this pigeon holeing. Pigeon hoeling. Pigeon holeing. Gonna try that one on my wife when I get home.

But I digress. I paid dearly for this worthless education in the literary arts. If I can't have the fundamentals of a sane brain, I am going to, at the least, spell correctly and follow coherent sentence structure. Otherwise, I will have gained less than nothing.

[SkinBasket]

Piss off! I'm gonna kick your ass in the meadow.

I thought there was to be tongue wipings of asses, not kicking.

[mraynrand]

I thought there was to be tongue wipings of asses, not kicking.

To each his own

[woodbuck27]

You are not a Nazi.

But the fact that you care enough to post this long of a script about god only knows what allows me to have the opinion that you are wrapped up a little to tight in this forum. You get made fun of because your posts are incoherent.

Write so mutherfuckers can understand what the fuck it is that you have to say. I am not asking for correct spelling or grammar, only the Skinbasket has enough time on his hands for that, what I am asking is that even the simpletons of the world can understand what you type.

Partial gets what he gets because he is a know it all punk on these forums. I have tried numerous times to council him but he has to throw his two cents in about every subject like it is 100% factual because it came from him. His attitude doesn't work and he gets flamed for it. When you insults someone's family or expose someone's personal life you cross the line here at Packerrats. Why is that so fucking hard to understand?

Deputy Nutz: I have zero problem with why Partial was banned. He lost it. As I understand it. I've not taken 'my time' to read the back and forth between Partial and retailguy. That's because I'm not intriged by sensationalism. I'm rather alarmed and disappointed that those two posters thatvI have zero problems with got so into it. That's to me sad.

Partial offered up threats that are certainly unacceptable here. He got banned as a penalty for his poor judgement. End of that.

The point I'm trying to raise is that what led up to his losing it? Was it just because he's labeled or was he treated fairly here?

I know what it feels like to be labeled. You Deputy Nutz, refer to me as ' a NAZI ' . A fricken' NAZI. Are you out of your mind with such an insensitive rotten label?? That's a sick outrageous reference and hardly what I try to represent here at Packerrats. I'm a decent man. I come here to try to bring nothing but 'good will' to this forum.

Your label of me as being a NAZI. Is beyond sick.

My Father fought the Nazi's mister. If he was alive and aware of your label for his son he'd insist I do alot more than take exception to your insensitivity and ignorance.

That label on me is more than an insult. It's plain stupidity on your part mister. Smarten the F . . . up mister.

[woodbuck27]

Woodbuck 27;

Asking for an executive summary does not impugn the readability of your work, just the length of it. In fact, you provided an executive summary of sorts in your response to HowardRoark immediately preceding your response to MJZiggy. Funny thing is, HR seems to have questioned the readability of your post more than MJZ did, yet you gave HR a summary and chastised MJZ. Why is that? A bit of misogyny perhaps?


Insisting that any of us read it implies that the value of your post is so great that we should all take the time to read it, regardless. That type of judgement should come from others who have ready it, not from you, the author.

In all honesty, I skip over many of your posts primarily because of length, sometimes also due to readability. But I can sympathize with you, because I would skip over many of mine too, when they get as long as some do. I suspect many people do skip many of mine for that very reason.

you provided an executive summary of sorts in your response to HowardRoark immediately preceding your response to MJZiggy. Funny thing is, HR seems to have questioned the readability of your post more than MJZ did, yet you gave HR a summary and chastised MJZ. Why is that? A bit of misogyny perhaps? ... Patler

A bit of misogyny perhaps? ... Patler

Absolutely not Patler.I'm not as you put it chastising MJ. I'm certainly asking for some decency in terms of the merit of my suggestion. THat is to have a seperate place on OUR forum where such confrontations may be ushered and not act in an way as a disturbance to the integrity of PackerRats as a place where posters can come and enjoy learning about football and many other noteworthy topics without this constant head banging between posters.

Let those posters take it to a place I refer to as 'The Meadow'. It might be better labeled 'the Alley'. Now if there are posters here that 'just must' enjoy this sort of back and forth. So be it; but it's away from the general 'good health' of OUR Packer Home.

I read most posts in their entirety Patler. I'm interested in most posters views here. For those posters that IMO are simply here to cause CRAP. I placed them on IGNORE. I had to do that as 'to confront them', would have been selfish on my part, in terms specifically related to why posters really come here. Because of their ignorance and negative personality flaws . . . really stupid.

Now if we had a Meadow or and Alley. Any poster here could invite any other poster into that section of the forum. One which is exclusive and the 'only' place where such confrontation would be tolerated. Let the boys go at it. That venue would have to have a set of rules to govern the manner in which posters debate.

[woodbuck27]

Can the rest of us watch the two posters in the meadow? Like the Roman Coliseum?

Can we bring woman posters to the meadow on a warm Spring afternoon?

Answer to first sentence. WHY NOT.

Second sentence. What on earth would any woman want with males headbanging it when she could be doing something productive with her life?