Happy Dance!

[retailguy]

Yes we disagree. First, it's not my opinion - it's a fact that you repeatedly lectured him on being mature and not attacking personally, then you behaved immaturely and engaged in personal attacks (see proof above. If you need more, there's plenty where that came from). My opinion: It wasn't necessary and was certainly hypocritical. And if you're going to accuse me of the same, it's not true. Fact: I gave him plenty of shit, but I never complained when he gave it back. Opinion: your little celebration - when the guy can no longer 'defend' himself - was petty and pathetic.

I'm sticking with the term opinion. One sided opinion. You could also point to post after post of partials personal attacks too (both to me and to others), but you won't because that doesn't support your biased slanted POV. Again, you're entitled to your opinion, from my opinion, you're wrong. Furthermore, you'd have a damn hard time proving your point with anyone other than Partial, plus you could point to any of 20 other posters who did the same or worse to partial than I did, but again, that won't help prove anything other than your point is biased.

Regarding this thread, I didn't mention partial by name, though it was clear that's what it was. I was sharing my happiness with the situation (which is genuine). You don't like it, fine, move along or put me back on ignore. Maybe you should implement the solution you prescribe to everyone else?

[retailguy]

Can we also have a gallows where a majority vote gets a poster hanged?

This is a great idea. Maybe I'm not the only one who doesn't understand an "outlaw forum"?

[mraynrand]

You could also point to post after post of partials personal attacks too (both to me and to others), but you won't because that doesn't support your biased slanted POV.

Blah, blah, blah. Nice strawman. I stated that Partial gave shit, and personally attacked. You can't even make an honest argument.

[mraynrand]

I'm sticking with the term opinion. One sided opinion. You could also point to post after post of partials personal attacks too (both to me and to others), but you won't because that doesn't support your biased slanted POV. Again, you're entitled to your opinion, from my opinion, you're wrong. Furthermore, you'd have a damn hard time proving your point with anyone other than Partial, plus you could point to any of 20 other posters who did the same or worse to partial than I did, but again, that won't help prove anything other than your point is biased.

Regarding this thread, I didn't mention partial by name, though it was clear that's what it was. I was sharing my happiness with the situation (which is genuine). You don't like it, fine, move along or put me back on ignore. Maybe you should implement the solution you prescribe to everyone else?

I wanted to point out your hypocrisy. I wanted to point out how pathetic and petty you were being. You poked the bear and got the bear to act like a bear. What a shock. And here you gloat that he's gone after he can't respond.

I wonder out load how many complaining PMs you sent....

[mraynrand]

I'm sticking with the term opinion.

The proof is above. It's a fact that you attacked him personally. You have the freedom to believe whatever you want, but I can site fact that shows you're delusional.

[Harlan Huckleby]

I wanted to point out your hypocrisy. I wanted to point out how pathetic and petty you were being. You poked the bear and got the bear to act like a bear. What a shock. And here you gloat that he's gone after he can't respond.

+1

[retailguy]

Blah, blah, blah. Nice strawman. I stated that Partial gave shit, and personally attacked. You can't even make an honest argument.

And here we go with the strawman comment again. It always ends the same way. As I said before, believe what you want, you're entitled to your opinion, and I disagree.

[SkinBasket]

+1

-1

Unless ya'll are using the term "poking the bear" this way:


The argument at hand aside, Partial was no more a "bear" than Harlan is a the intellectual giant he fashions himself. An angry louse with a Napoleon complex perhaps, but certainly no bear.

[mraynrand]

We have some real punk ass'éd posters that need to get a virtual humiliating ass kicking. They need to be humbled.

To thine own self be true!

[mraynrand]

And here we go with the strawman comment again. It always ends the same way.

Indeed. I look forward to an honest debate

[mraynrand]

The argument at hand aside, Partial was no more a "bear" than Harlan is a the intellectual giant he fashions himself. An angry louse with a Napoleon complex perhaps, but certainly no bear.

It's just an expression. The point being that if you attack him you're gonna get a nasty response. That's not to say he wouldn't unleash an unprovoked tirade or some other such nonsense. He did that all the time. Patler, for example, was able to ignore that crap. Others took offense, claimed the mature moral high ground, all the while engaging in some of the same crap.

[SkinBasket]

Others took offense, claimed the mature moral high ground, all the while engaging in some of the same crap.

I know. They've been debasing my art form.

[mraynrand]

-1

Unless ya'll are using the term "poking the bear" this way:


The argument at hand aside, Partial was no more a "bear" than Harlan is a the intellectual giant he fashions himself. An angry louse with a Napoleon complex perhaps, but certainly no bear.

http://s453.photobucket.com/albums/q...rent=Bleah.mp4

[woodbuck27]

Indeed. I look forward to an honest debate

THE MEADOW.

Let's develop a new site on PackerRats. The meadowB].

That's where this sort of matter or any dissention can be dealt with for the overall good health of Packerrats. Away from the general population and decent good will of OUR Packer Home. A Green Bay Packer HOME which should be excluded from such bad feelings between... ahh.... gentleman.

The Meadow where honour should be, if necessary, restored and with difnity intact. If I have a dispute wit Harry and that dispute cannot be resolved between Harry and I within the confines of a reasonale time frame. If a dispute or insult becomes a feud. The whole villiage doesn't nor should have to be involved.

The solution. The Meadow.

We have a community here. People of all sorts and personality post here. In any community bad feelings may unfortunately and realistically follow insult. If a poster feels the need to resore personal dignity. That poster should NOT be unfairly judged or feel the frenzy, as others chirp in with their two cents worth. When the issue is none of their business. Why should any poster ever feel the need to choose a side and gang on one side Vs any individual poster here at PackerRats!??

We've posters that plainly do not want to come here and see this sort of drama enacted. I personaly feel terrile over such dissention.

Just a comment over this latest bruhaahaa. I do not want to seemas I'm choosing any side as that isn,t the case. I just want to offer my skills as a leader. I 've posted here since the Spring of 2006. I have done service to PackerRats and I am certinly loyal. I'm qualified by a lifetime of leadership. I will contend that I'm a member of PackerRats with overall, a solid performance record and a history of positive contribution. Thus I feel it necessary to offer a simple solution.

My post in no way should be interpreted as choosing sides. I've no contenton with either retailguy or Partial. I must make this comment based on my observation.

I've observed Partial get bullied to the point I am sure he had to go nearly mad. Partial is a hman being folks.He has been treated horrifically by certain people her that in no way can set themselves aside as models of comportment. Partial has beendriven so hard IMO he had to break. Explode (slash) IMPLODE !!

Overall this sort of issue reflects poorly on why PackerRats exists. We need to be here to discuss our beloved Green Bay Packers and keep abreast of team developments. To similiarly discuss the NFL in general. To discuss fantasy sports, Pro baseball and basketball. To discuss anything in Romper Room. None of these venues needs to be tarnished over matters of honor.

Posters will even find difference with this common sense solution. The MEADOW.So I sand here and forever to offer this is an easy solution to any bad feelings between posters. This solution is clearly reasonable and if adopted will greatly benefit PackerRats.

Why ? THe MEADOW. . . . and

No! The Garbage can isn't the answer as the venue in OUR forum for such encounter. I assume that venue covers other topics. I don't enter the Garbage can for personal reasons.All the debate as to who was right or wrong and who's hypocriticle or otherwise accused of this and that wrong. All that can be posted in 'The Meadow'.

Why?

Because all of that only ads more pain to the initial engagement of posters not geting along. If any poster is insulted, bullied or stalked or otherwise affronted by any poster (S).

That insulted poster should be able, unjudged by others, to defend his (her) honor. My suggestion of such a venue is the solution to keeping PackerRats a site which deserves the highest reputation on the internet. The Meadow will restore 'virtual reality' to OUR forum. If any poster here insults me, otherwise attacks me. I should be able to call him out and defend my integrity. I should be able to do so without being judged or otherwise incurring the wrath of posters here. Posters that should have no part or offense with my issues brought on by the careless antics of certain posters here that exist primarily IMO to insult and ridicule innoscent people. Those same posters IMO by and large are 'the Usual suspects', I've referred to in a past post and connected in my honest observation with just this sort of negative for OUR Packer Home. This issue of contentious behaviour here has to be dealt with sensably in an area of OUR Forum that's far far away from the general good health and color of Packerrats. A special place set apart to duel it out 'one on one'.

I'm not the poster here that protests too much. I'm a poster here that really carescabout the overall good will in PackerRats.

I'm a poster that deserves to defend my honor. As all others here should be able to, as well. To post with proper esteem without harassment and make a positive contribution here overall and never have to use a counter attack on any other poster in open forum. If I do I get a one time warning to move it to 'the Meadow', or suffer the ire of the ownership, management and leadership that must protect the membership overall anything else. That group 'OUR LEADERSHIP', must have a primary duty to protect the integrity of PackerRats overall; insist on posters not being selfish rather by far contributing and mutually promoteing the deserved good will of PackerRats.

i.e.

If any poster here feels a need to attack or insult me. He (she) can then be called out by me and I will warn Y'all. I will in some cases of observing certain posters do just that. I will ask him (her) or them, into ' the Meadow , and I will ' in debate ' royally kick his (her) their ass. That isn't arrogance, rather confidence Packerrats. If I draw my sword in real life I'm going to defeat my enemy. In OUR near future I'M confident that my suggestion will become reality at PackerRats. Why? Again, it just makes sense. We need common sense here folks.

All good men and women will be able to defend their honor in THE MEADOW; if need be.

The Meadow. Will return PackerRats to a higher level of good will among posters.

P. S. Have a very pleasant day evening PackerRats. (-:

[B]My name is Edwin woodbuck27 and Bert Bosch in Fantasy Sports.

[woodbuck27]

http://s453.photobucket.com/albums/q...rent=Bleah.mp4

There's a whole lot going on in that photo. I'm thinking........