If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
update2: my album is mistitled in iTunes, it is not "the taste of ink" but instead titled "Maybe Memories"
Anyway, yeah, I enjoy a few songs on that such a blue and yellow, the taste of ink, on my own, poetic tradegy, buried myself alive.. It's got some good rock songs, not really my style of music anymore, but its a pretty solid album.
I can't run no more
With that lawless crowd
While the killers in high places
Say their prayers out loud
But they've summoned, they've summoned up
A thundercloud
They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen
Even though I know Mad is an IE hombre, I will go ahead and say that IE sucks. Firefox is infinitely better. The reasons for this are as follows:
Tabbed browsing standard. Control-t FTW!
Much faster rendering engine. Por.. I mean Packer Rats has never loaded as quickly!
More compliant with ISO standards. Pretty much every page looks prettier and visually closer to what the artist had in mind when creating the page.
Less security issues - IE and the admin account are the root of windows problems. Firefox doesn't have these same issues
Open source.
Of course, none of these can even come close to Camino, the aqua-ified version of Firefox made by the Mozilla team for OS X. Even better than that, are Webkit browsers. They're faster than Firefox and they sure are pretty. They have less ISO compliance than FF, but more than IE by a landslide. Safari and Shiira for the win!
Even though I know Mad is an IE hombre, I will go ahead and say that IE sucks. Firefox is infinitely better. The reasons for this are as follows:
Tabbed browsing standard. Control-t FTW!
Much faster rendering engine. Por.. I mean Packer Rats has never loaded as quickly!
More compliant with ISO standards. Pretty much every page looks prettier and visually closer to what the artist had in mind when creating the page.
Less security issues - IE and the admin account are the root of windows problems. Firefox doesn't have these same issues
Open source.
Of course, none of these can even come close to Camino, the aqua-ified version of Firefox made by the Mozilla team for OS X. Even better than that, are Webkit browsers. They're faster than Firefox and they sure are pretty. They have less ISO compliance than FF, but more than IE by a landslide. Safari and Shiira for the win!
I would agree with this, but IE7 seems to be an improvement in text quality and finally has tabs.
I use Firefox almost exclusively but IE7 seems to work better with Exchange 2003's webmail so I use IE7 at work.
What happened to the old thread where random people answered and then asked a new question? That was kind of cool--not to trump this thread. I think there's room for both.
"There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson
Good job on the "which way is up" question. Very creative.
How about this one ... does water float?
That is entirely dependent on the density the water would would be mixed with as well as the polarity of that substance. Oil is non-polar for example with the lone bonds being londor-dispersion (I believe at least, I have been out of chem for two years) where is Water is held by polar, hydrogen bonds. There is more to it, but that is really all that I understand. In the setting where you could achieve a higher density substance than water that is non-polar, then the answer is yes, water would float.
Comment