It's great to be home

[Harlan Huckleby]

Scott, please don't bring the old stuff up. I don't think my remarks were too detailed or damning, just forget it.

And I will apologize for some of the more caustic stuff I've said about you, the "sick" remark etc.

I don't care so much about past behavior. It's the continuing unwillingness to backoff.

[Scott Campbell]

Harlan, I'd just ignore the asshole and he'll quit replying to your posts.

I think you're dead on Harvey. If he didn't have the smear campaign agenda going in full gear, that's exactly what he would do.

[Scott Campbell]

Scott, please don't bring the old stuff up. I don't think my remarks were too detailed or damning, just forget it.

I didn't bring it up. You did. Again, and again, and again. And your coverage was quite one sided I might add. Your remarks suited your purpose - smear campaign. At this point I think it's best that we just get the whole thing out there.

[Harlan Huckleby]

Well, go ahead and unburden yourself if you think it is necessary. I've asked Mad to close my account tonight, so I won't see what you wrote.

[Scott Campbell]

And I will apologize for some of the more caustic stuff I've said about you, the "sick" remark etc.

I don't really care about Dr. Huckleby's diagnosis. You've done it to so many people that I think it's lost a lot of it's zip. I do know that I don't stoop to speculating on peoples mental health. That's kind of a nasty habit.

I'm more interested in you examining the role you played during the event. Your comments thus far seem a little self serving by trying to pin responsibility for your part in this entirely on me. Now I guess that wouldn't be much of an issue if you weren't hell bent on bringing it up over and over again. But you did. So I think it's time for an objective autopsy.

[the_idle_threat]

I think we need Dr. Phil in here ...

[Scott Campbell]

Well, go ahead and unburden yourself if you think it is necessary. I've asked Mad to close my account tonight, so I won't see what you wrote.

Well that's too bad. It might do you some good to read it. I'm not sure you know the entire story either.

It'll include editorial comment, but I'll try and be fair about it. If I get any facts wrong, I hope to be corrected. And I invite anyone that disagrees with me to let me have an earful if they feel like it. I realize that my version may not be the only version.

[the_idle_threat]

When it's time for this to get published ... if you need some hunky, shirtless guy to pose for the cover, I'm not that guy. FYI

[Harlan Huckleby]

Evidently Mad has stayed my execution.

Scott, whatever happened in that incident has no relevance to our discussion. I mentioned your past pattern of bickering with Woody, because it is the same behavior you switched over to me.

I've been asking you to leave me alone for three months. Your theory that my motive is to smear you is wrong and makes no sense. I have never initiated any conversation with or about you, other than angry responses to your constant hectoring.

Harvey, perhaps others, suggests I could have dealt with you by ignoring you, and then becoming your friend. To these advice givers, you might not find this advice so helpful if you find yourself bugged obsessively by somebody for several months. Sometimes you have to respond to crap that is thrown out. And to me, harassing behavior is just wrong and should be confronted.

Scott, resucitating the details of the old conflcit is just another diversion. And I wonder who you think is holding hard feelings against you, that you need to state your case to. Well, there's me, but I simply wish to seperate from you. Who are you writing your report for?

[GBRulz]

I think there is a significant point being obscured here. If all Harlan wanted was this to be stopped, he'd be acting much differently.

His hidden agenda goes beyond stopping me. He wants me labled as the bad guy. And he wants his label back as the good guy. He shifts the smear campaign into high gear, and then cries harrassment when I retaliate.

I think I know what a victim looks like, and Harlan ain't no victim despite his attempts to play one. Look more carefully at his agenda. It's plenty obvious.

As for taking it offline - it is offline. This is the Romper Room. If people don't want to read it, they don't have to. I had to read about all of Jack and Michele's issues, so turnabout seems fair enough to me.

Partial makes a reasonable point about thread jacking. If he doesn't want it in here and requests that I start a new thread - I will.

The difference is that my and Michele's issues are a primary reason of why this place was created. I'd still be at JSO if none of that shit happened...and most of us still would too.

tyler

I can't even believe this was brought up as a comparison. LAME

[Scott Campbell]

Evidently Mad has stayed my execution.

Good grief. Can't you just admit you changed your mind. Why try to blame Mad for your return?

[jack's smirking revenge]

The difference is that my and Michele's issues are a primary reason of why this place was created. I'd still be at JSO if none of that shit happened...and most of us still would too.

tyler

Jack, I really don't like pointing out that you've gotten into it over here too, but you've kind of backed me into a corner. You and Mad. Michele and Nick. Hey, people get into it once in a while. No biggie. I like how you conduct yourself, and respect your opinion. Same goes for Michele. Just don't agree here.

Harlan has had free reign to spin his version of the "event", and I've kept quiet about what he did for the most part out of respect for Woody - believe it or not. Harlan has engaged in a smear campaign from that day forward, and continues the campaign even now as he cries harrassment.

You may have taken his side on the issue, and that's fine. But I'm not sure you've heard both sides. Now Harlan keeps bringing it up over and over again, and each time the fish gets bigger and bigger. At some point I feel like I deserve the opportunity for a rebuttal.

Contrary to what I've said, I'm not really taking a side on the issue. I just believe, like GBRulz(Michele), that drama like this should be taken to PM and not dealt with out in the open. I understand your side and Harlan's side and I don't think there's a way to fix this.

tyler

[GBRulz]

The difference is that my and Michele's issues are a primary reason of why this place was created. I'd still be at JSO if none of that shit happened...and most of us still would too.

tyler

Jack, I really don't like pointing out that you've gotten into it over here too, but you've kind of backed me into a corner. You and Mad. Michele and Nick. Hey, people get into it once in a while. No biggie. I like how you conduct yourself, and respect your opinion. Same goes for Michele. Just don't agree here.

Harlan has had free reign to spin his version of the "event", and I've kept quiet about what he did for the most part out of respect for Woody - believe it or not. Harlan has engaged in a smear campaign from that day forward, and continues the campaign even now as he cries harrassment.

You may have taken his side on the issue, and that's fine. But I'm not sure you've heard both sides. Now Harlan keeps bringing it up over and over again, and each time the fish gets bigger and bigger. At some point I feel like I deserve the opportunity for a rebuttal.

Contrary to what I've said, I'm not really taking a side on the issue. I just believe, like GBRulz(Michele), that drama like this should be taken to PM and not dealt with out in the open. I understand your side and Harlan's side and I don't think there's a way to fix this.

tyler

I agree with JSR. I really like Harlan and Scott. I wish you guys could somehow swallow your male pride (i know, it's asking alot) and just move on. Put your energy into hating the actual enemy....which this week are the Bears fans

[GBRulz]

and in Scott's case, it might be Warren Jeff

[Scott Campbell]

Who are you writing your report for?

You ask me direct quesitons. You respond to all my points and posts. Your behavior is not consistent with someone who merely wishes to be left alone. You appear to have more on your agenda. And it's plainly transparrent.

You seek to have me censored. Blamed. Blacklisted. This is hardly an original tactic. Senator Joe McCarthy did much the same as he attempted to obscure his agenda by having his critics put on lists. In this case McCarthy's communist sympathiser has become Harlan's harrasser or stalker.

You posted your real name, email address. It wouldn't take much effort at all if someone truly wanted to harrass you. I haven't bothered you one bit outside of here. I offered to stop busting your balls if you'd just stick to Packer football. You responded by saying "Who the fuck do you think you are?"

Again, your behavior is just not consistent with someone who merely wishes to be left alone. Your agenda clearly goes beyond just that. As Harvey points out, you can and have dished it out with the best of them. And in this case you happen to be dishing out passive aggressive McCarthyism in the hopes of gaining support for having a vocal critic silenced.

In my opinion.