Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mohammed likely to top British boys' names list by year-end

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by K-town
    Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
    What did it used to be? A second rate power, high unemployment, socialist-welfare programs, etc., etc.
    Tee-hee. In 1900, "the sun never sets on the British Empire."
    Now the British Empire consists of Scotland, Wales and the Falkland Islands.
    Tough having sympathy for the British, who would now all be speaking German if it wasn't for the US. Let us not forget that in both World Wars they had more men and material than the Germans, and STILL lost most of the European continent. TWICE.
    Kind of amusing to see how they lost India, Palestine, their African Colonies, etc. But not as amusing as how they lost the North American continent. :P
    The British deserve a lot more credit for what they did in WWII than you are giving them. They stood up to Germany in the Battle Of Britain while the U.S. was staying mostly in isolation. The invasion of Normandy would not have been possible without their victory in the Battle Of Britain. The second front would have had to come through Italy, which would have been much more difficult, resulting in a longer war and many more U.S. casualties.

    Britain lost their colonies after WWII because they were in no condition to hold an empire together. They were broke, and many of their major cities were heavily damaged by the Nazi bombardment. I'm not saying colonialism was a good idea, but they lost their empire in part because of the sacrifices they made in WWII.

    I would be interested to know your source of information for saying that Britain had more men and material in the World Wars than Germany. I could be wrong, but I find that hard to believe.
    I can't run no more
    With that lawless crowd
    While the killers in high places
    Say their prayers out loud
    But they've summoned, they've summoned up
    A thundercloud
    They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by BallHawk
      Great point. The Islamic Terrorists of Britain are being created right on their soil. The Fundamentalism being taught in Mosques across London is not what you'd find, in say, Iran or Syria. The way that the "new-era" of suicide bombers are being created is no different then the way Evangelical Christians are brought up. They are introduced at a very young age when they are open to anything and are essentially "brainwashed" from that point on.

      Pakistan is the source of Islamic Radicalism in England. Almost all of the London Suicide Bombers visited Pakistan before their "mission."
      Interesting comparison. So, in your view, Evangelical Christians are a threat as well?

      I don't quite get your point, but I'm trying. You're saying that the way Christian parents rear their kids at home and the instruction they receive in church in England "is no different" than the way that eventual suicide bombers, which spread terror by blowing themselves up and killing others, are reared?

      How far do you equate the two? Beyond childhood? Are radical muslims and evangelical christians equally dangerous in your mind? Please explain/clarify.

      Comment


      • #18
        If we're talking WWII, Russia (Soviet Union) gave up more then anybody.

        I'm not downing America, but the USSR was far more influential on the war. The Soviets won WWII. Soviet soldiers fought with a passion unparalleled to any country during WWII. The casualties don't lie. 2 countries, excluding the USSR, had more casualties then the United States; Yugoslavia and China. China had almost 4 million deaths. The two main "percepted" allies were.

        United States: 407,000
        United Kingdom: 382,000

        Between those two the numbers work out as roughly 790,000 deaths.

        USSR: 10,700,000

        That's about 13 times the deaths of the US and UK. The Soviets had more deaths then all of the other allies combined. That's not even to mention the 10,000,000+ civilian deaths.
        "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Kiwon
          Originally posted by BallHawk
          Great point. The Islamic Terrorists of Britain are being created right on their soil. The Fundamentalism being taught in Mosques across London is not what you'd find, in say, Iran or Syria. The way that the "new-era" of suicide bombers are being created is no different then the way Evangelical Christians are brought up. They are introduced at a very young age when they are open to anything and are essentially "brainwashed" from that point on.

          Pakistan is the source of Islamic Radicalism in England. Almost all of the London Suicide Bombers visited Pakistan before their "mission."
          Interesting comparison. So, in your view, Evangelical Christians are a threat as well?

          I don't quite get your point, but I'm trying. You're saying that the way Christian parents rear their kids at home and the instruction they receive in church in England "is no different" than the way that eventual suicide bombers, which spread terror by blowing themselves up and killing others, are reared?

          How far do you equate the two? Beyond childhood? Are radical muslims and evangelical christians equally dangerous in your mind? Please explain/clarify.
          In no way am I comparing Evangelical Christians to Suicide Bombers or any other type of terrorism. However, and I'm not trying to offend anyone here, Evangelicals are very devout in getting their children into their faith at a very young age. Is there anything wrong with that? No, of course not. But there is no way that we can look at Islam and think anything different. Of course, Fundamentalist Islam is preaching a way more violent message then Evangelicalism, but the basis of teaching is the same. It was a comparison in the ways that the children are taught and brought up, not about the message being preached.
          "I've got one word for you- Dallas, Texas, Super Bowl"- Jermichael Finley

          Comment


          • #20
            I'm afraid of things that are different than me.
            Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Originally posted by BallHawk
              Have you been to England recently? Once you've been you realize how much of an impact Muslims are having on that country. We've already seen the impact they had in the Underground bombings. All of my family lives within 10 miles of London and even my Grandmother, who is normally optimistic, says that she's glad she won't be around in 20 years to see what the country is like. Far too many immigrants, specifically Pakistanis, were allowed into the country. Crime has seen a significant spike over the last decade. That isn't a coincidence. It's sad to see that England is such a far cry from what it used to be.
              A lot of what is happening often happens when a large number of immigrants enter a country--no matter the religious affiliation, nationality, or race. On the other hand, you'd be foolish to think that what is happening is a good thing--not until the moderate Muslim believers take back their religion. In this case, there can't be a silent majority.

              I'm thinking anybody that thinks otherwise probably falls under three categories: 1) a Muslim, 2) an agnostic or atheist that has a natural bent against all religions, especially Christianity (usually this is a young person who believes in the idea of a utopian society devoid of religion--often within a socialist framework), 3) an old-time liberal who has been programmed to think all people are basically good.

              I don't believe most Muslims are bad people. I just can't do the Ostrich approach and pretend there's nothing to worry about at this moment in history.

              What he said......

              Comment


              • #22
                Harv seems incredibly educated and well-spoken. I agree with his statement 100%

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Partial
                  Harv seems incredibly educated and well-spoken. I agree with his statement 100%

                  Well, maybe well spoken but the other might be taking it too far....







                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Damn! If nobody responded, I thought that meant everybody agreed with his post. Now, you've gone and ruined it.
                    "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                      Damn! If nobody responded, I thought that meant everybody agreed with his post. Now, you've gone and ruined it.

                      Sorry, I'm sure everyone else was nodding their agreement with Partial....puffing on their pipe (legal tobbaco ) and mumbling...."indeed, indeed".


                      edit: Tank excluded.....

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Here's another slice of Eurabia.....

                        'Honour killing' sister breaks her silence

                        Britain was appalled by the horrific 'honour killing' of a girl murdered by her father for daring to kiss the man she loved. Here, her sister, who narrowly escaped death herself and now lives in fear of her life, breaks her silence

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by K-town
                          Tough having sympathy for the British, who would now all be speaking German if it wasn't for the US.

                          I think we too might be speaking German if it weren't for the English and the Russians. We didn't win that war by ourselves.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Geezus you guys! All this talk about speaking German. Haven't you ever been up near Antigo. For criminy sakes, dey all are talking German up der, doncha know?

                            Also, it's a good thing we won in Viet Nam, otherwise we'd all be speaking ... uh, whatever the hell they speak in Viet Nam.
                            "Never, never ever support a punk like mraynrand. Rather be as I am and feel real sympathy for his sickness." - Woodbuck

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X