Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What a joke....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What a joke....

    July 2, 2007
    Bush Commutes Libby’s Prison Sentence
    By SHERYL GAY STOLBERG

    WASHINGTON, July 2 — President Bush said today that he had used his power of clemency to commute the 30-month sentence for I. Lewis Libby Jr., the former top aide to Vice President Dick Cheney, who was convicted of perjury in March and was due to begin serving his time within weeks.

    The action, announced just hours after a federal appeals court denied Mr. Libby’s request to allow him to remain free while his case is on appeal, spares Mr. Libby his prison term, but it does not excuse him from stiff fines or probation.

    In a statement issued early this evening announcing his decision, Mr. Bush said he had listened to both critics and defenders of Mr. Libby, who was convicted of four felony counts for lying during a C.I.A. leak investigation.

    “I respect the jury’s verdict,” Mr. Bush said. “But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive. Therefore, I am commuting the portion of Mr. Libby’s sentence that required him to spend 30 months in prison.”

    Like a pardon, a commutation is a form of clemency, granted to the president by the Constitution. But a pardon is an official act of forgiveness, whereas a commutation simply reduces the penalty, without making an official judgment of forgiveness.

    Mr. Bush has been urged by some conservatives to grant Mr. Libby an outright pardon.

    The president noted in his statement that that the decision to commute “leaves in place a harsh punishment for Mr. Libby.”

    “The reputation he gained through his years of public service and professional work in the legal community is forever damaged,” Mr. Bush said. “His wife and young children have suffered immensely. He will remain on probation.”

    The unanimous decision earlier today by a three-judge panel, which had been widely expected, upheld a ruling of Judge Reggie B. Walton, who presided over the trial of Mr. Libby.

    Judge Walton had ruled that the issues being raised on appeal by Mr. Libby’s lawyers were not substantial enough to have a strong chance of succeeding, which meant that under the law the sentence should not be delayed.

    In June, Mr. Libby was sentenced to 30 months in prison and a $250,000 fine after he was convicted in March of obstructing justice and lying to a grand jury and F.B.I. agents who were investigating the disclosure of the identity of a Central Intelligence Agency operative, Valerie Wilson.
    C.H.U.D.

  • #2
    "The unanimous decision earlier today by a three-judge panel, which had been widely expected, upheld a ruling of Judge Reggie B. Walton, who presided over the trial of Mr. Libby."

    It should be noted that 2 of those 3 three-judge panel members were Republican judges appointed by George W. Bush. Apparently, they felt the evidence was so strong against Scoter Libby that they wanted him to serve the sentence immediately.

    This "commutation" really translates to an outright pardon. Conservatives were already collecting funds for his appeal process. That $250,000 fine is mere peanuts that probably already been collected.

    That leaves just 2 years of probation for Libby.

    W. has again proved that the primary virtue he expects of his aides is loyalty. Competance and ahearance to the law are irrelevat factors.

    Comment


    • #3
      This will assure that Libby will never go public about how he covered up for the Vice-President (and maybe the President's office) in the Valerie Plame affair.
      I can't run no more
      With that lawless crowd
      While the killers in high places
      Say their prayers out loud
      But they've summoned, they've summoned up
      A thundercloud
      They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Joemailman
        This will assure that Libby will never go public about how he covered up for the Vice-President (and maybe the President's office) in the Valerie Plame affair.
        We all knew a pardon was coming but when the stay was refused Dubya had to protect his man. The fine was the laughable part of the "punishment" in the first place. God bless executive privilege.
        C.H.U.D.

        Comment


        • #5
          Statement by Patrick Fitzgerald, the prosecutor in the Libby case:

          We fully recognize that the Constitution provides that commutation decisions are a matter of presidential prerogative and we do not comment on the exercise of that prerogative.

          * We comment only on the statement in which the President termed the sentence imposed by the judge as “excessive.” The sentence in this case was imposed pursuant to the laws governing sentencings which occur every day throughout this country. In this case, an experienced federal judge considered extensive argument from the parties and then imposed a sentence consistent with the applicable laws. It is fundamental to the rule of law that all citizens stand before the bar of justice as equals. That principle guided the judge during both the trial and the sentencing.
          * Although the President’s decision eliminates Mr. Libby’s sentence of imprisonment, Mr. Libby remains convicted by a jury of serious felonies, and we will continue to seek to preserve those convictions through the appeals process.
          I can't run no more
          With that lawless crowd
          While the killers in high places
          Say their prayers out loud
          But they've summoned, they've summoned up
          A thundercloud
          They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

          Comment


          • #6
            Agreed. It is a joke.

            How does somebody get convicted of lying to investigators in a case where no crime was committed?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Kiwon
              Agreed. It is a joke.

              How does somebody get convicted of lying to investigators in a case where no crime was committed?
              Kiwon, I never knew you felt so passionate about Bill Clinton.
              Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

              Comment


              • #8


                In my opinion, Clinton never should have been impeached on the Lewinsky matter. But Clinton and "innocent" hardly go together.

                Innocent men don't settle a case (Paula Jones sexual harassment suit) by agreeing to pay the plantiff the whole amount she was seeking ($850,000) after fighting it for so long.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Clinton pardoned some guilty people too as he was leaving office, including some wealthy people that padded his bank account. I remember reading about one individual he pardon and can't recall the name, but he was a crook but had megamillions. The difference between Bush and Clinton is that Clinton did it on his way out, Bush has another 18 months in office. Call it a joke but other presidents bailed pals out too. Doesn't make it right, but it's politics as usual.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Marc Rich is an international commodities trader. He fled the United States in 1983 to live in Switzerland while being prosecuted on charges of tax evasion and illegally making oil deals with Iran during the hostage crisis.

                    He received a presidential pardon from United States President Bill Clinton in 2001, which required him to pay a $100 million fine before the charges would be dropped.

                    Surprise! Scooter Libby was Marc Rich's lawyer for 15 years (1985-2000).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Kiwon
                      Agreed. It is a joke.

                      How does somebody get convicted of lying to investigators in a case where no crime was committed?
                      Perjury is perjury.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Kiwon
                        Surprise! Scooter Libby was Marc Rich's lawyer for 15 years (1985-2000).
                        Wow! This makes it all the more interesting.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by LL2
                          Clinton pardoned some guilty people too as he was leaving office, including some wealthy people that padded his bank account. I remember reading about one individual he pardon and can't recall the name, but he was a crook but had megamillions. The difference between Bush and Clinton is that Clinton did it on his way out, Bush has another 18 months in office. Call it a joke but other presidents bailed pals out too. Doesn't make it right, but it's politics as usual.
                          I could care less who pardoned who in the past. No citizen should have this authority. The people made a decision and it should stand unless reversed in a court of law. I have no problem with stays in execution being granted but not pardons and such. And a big difference is that Libby worked for the VP.
                          C.H.U.D.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Damn. I was hoping it was a joke thread.
                            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MJZiggy
                              Damn. I was hoping it was a joke thread.
                              Sorry about that Zig.
                              C.H.U.D.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X