Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Thompson a Packer til 2012

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Thompson a Packer til 2012

    Originally posted by gbgary
    Originally posted by MJZiggy
    Thompson a Packer til 2012

    i'll bet we have a billion dollars of cap room saved up by then.
    Good. We'll need it to resign all the young talent Thompson's brought in.
    "You're all very smart, and I'm very dumb." - Partial

    Comment


    • #17
      Coolman, or whoever you are, the fans in Detroit would love to have the "incompetence" of a Ted Thompson running a 13-3 team that is the youngest in the league and has plenty of cap space next year.

      So if TT is incompentent, what is Matt Millen?
      "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

      KYPack

      Comment


      • #18
        [quote="coolman3"]
        Originally posted by MJZiggy
        ...which lead to 8-8 and then 12-3 with a first round bye...

        quote]

        APB also wrote a flawless argument over there. It is entitled "An Argument Against the Contract Extension of Ted Thompson." In short, APB concludes:

        And so in conclusion, we have made a sound and persuasive argument. We have argued logically and with indisputable evidences that, due to Thompson's incompetence running the Packer football operation, he does not deserve a contract extension. Thompson's abominations should not go unaccounted for, and if there is any justice left in this conservative-corrupted world, his contract should (deservedly) be terminated.

        But as we are also extreme liberals, we are open-minded to the realm of extreme paranormals. Mike Sherman, despite his profound success, was let go too soon by the incompetent Bob Harlan, before he had the opportunity to kiss the Lombardi Trophy in front of Nike (the goddess of victory). The 2007 season has ended. A new season begins. The Playoffs. If the Packers can manage to achieve the insurmountable, and win three straight games, then we-as extreme liberals-will be the first to concede to our opponents' fallacious notion that there is indeed an ounce of competence within so incompetent a Polar Bear. We may even concede to their fallacious belief that Ted Thompson is superior to Mike Sherman as a general manager.
        This is a first. I've never seen a poster be his own biatch!
        "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Fritz
          Coolman, or whoever you are, the fans in Detroit would love to have the "incompetence" of a Ted Thompson running a 13-3 team that is the youngest in the league and has plenty of cap space next year.

          So if TT is incompentent, what is Matt Millen?
          Fritz, even the geek Patler can not dispute these obvious facts: After 3 seasons as gm, Sherman won 34 games; after 3 seasons, Thompson won 25 games. Even if the Pack go 16-0 next season, Sherman would still have more wins than Thompson within 4 seasons. Sherman got fired. Thompson got a new contract. Defies logic!!!

          Millen is a whipping boy. As long as the Ford family needs a whipping boy, Millen will always be around.
          MIKE SHERMAN IS THE ONLY GM IN NFL HISTORY WHO NEVER MISSED THE PLAYOFFS

          Comment


          • #20
            In each of Thompson's seasons, the team improved and they went further. Thus proving that your friend APB is not too good with the math and logic--and this is coming from a completely non-math person, and the only reason you're claiming that Patler could not argue with that logic is because he doesn't happen to be logged in at the moment.
            "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

            Comment


            • #21
              Great to see TT extended. He really has built a winning team for the long term.
              All hail the Ruler of the Meadow!

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by coolman3
                Originally posted by Fritz
                Coolman, or whoever you are, the fans in Detroit would love to have the "incompetence" of a Ted Thompson running a 13-3 team that is the youngest in the league and has plenty of cap space next year.

                So if TT is incompentent, what is Matt Millen?
                Fritz, even the geek Patler can not dispute these obvious facts: After 3 seasons as gm, Sherman won 34 games; after 3 seasons, Thompson won 25 games. Even if the Pack go 16-0 next season, Sherman would still have more wins than Thompson within 4 seasons. Sherman got fired. Thompson got a new contract. Defies logic!!!

                Millen is a whipping boy. As long as the Ford family needs a whipping boy, Millen will always be around.
                Sherman succeeded Wolf
                Thompson succeeded Sherman

                Who took over the better situation personnel-wise. When you combine HC/GM into one person, the HC can often have a fool for a GM.
                "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by MJZiggy
                  In each of Thompson's seasons, the team improved and they went further. Thus proving that your friend APB is not too good with the math and logic--and this is coming from a completely non-math person, and the only reason you're claiming that Patler could not argue with that logic is because he doesn't happen to be logged in at the moment.
                  With all due respect, MJZiggy, you're the one who is not very good at math. In one of your thread above, you wrote, and I quote "...and then 12-3 with a first round bye." Um..there are 16 regular season games. I guess that biology professor at Harvard is right: women are inferior intellectually compared to men, due to women's smaller brain size.

                  Do the math, it is not hard to improve upon a 4 win season.
                  MIKE SHERMAN IS THE ONLY GM IN NFL HISTORY WHO NEVER MISSED THE PLAYOFFS

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by coolman3
                    Do the math, it is not hard to improve upon a 4 win season.
                    It is hard to put together a 13 win one.

                    I didn't see Sherman do it.
                    My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by coolman3
                      Originally posted by MJZiggy
                      In each of Thompson's seasons, the team improved and they went further. Thus proving that your friend APB is not too good with the math and logic--and this is coming from a completely non-math person, and the only reason you're claiming that Patler could not argue with that logic is because he doesn't happen to be logged in at the moment.
                      With all due respect, MJZiggy, you're the one who is not very good at math. In one of your thread above, you wrote, and I quote "...and then 12-3 with a first round bye." Um..there are 16 regular season games. I guess that biology professor at Harvard is right: women are inferior intellectually compared to men, due to women's smaller brain size.

                      Do the math, it is not hard to improve upon a 4 win season.
                      Excuse the typo. 13-3. Doesn't change the fact that your so-called logic doesn't work. It's not hard to improve on 4 wins, but it's damned hard to achieve 13.
                      "Greatness is not an act... but a habit.Greatness is not an act... but a habit." -Greg Jennings

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Gotta love tank criticizing somebody for typo.
                        "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Carolina_Packer

                          Sherman succeeded Wolf
                          Thompson succeeded Sherman

                          Who took over the better situation personnel-wise. When you combine HC/GM into one person, the HC can often have a fool for a GM.
                          Lets see...When Sherman first started he had Freeman and Schroeder as starting WRs. He had some guy named K-Something Something as a starting DE. He had a guy named Bernado Harris as starting MLB. He had Tyrone Williams as starting cb.

                          When Thompson took over he had Javon Walker and Donald Driver as WRs, both pro bowlers. He had Aaron Kampman as starting DE (drafted by Sherman). He had Nick Barnett as starting MLB (drafted by Sherman). He had Al Harris (aquired by Sherman) as starting cb.

                          Sherman had the great O line assembled by Wolf. Thompson could've had a greater line had he kept Wahle and drafted Logan Mankins.

                          Thompson took over the better situation. But fucked it up.
                          MIKE SHERMAN IS THE ONLY GM IN NFL HISTORY WHO NEVER MISSED THE PLAYOFFS

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Why are we arguing with Tank? Hasn't history proven that he's impervious to logic?

                            Thompson could win the next 5 superbowls and some people would still want to rip on them, the best bet is to just ignore those people.
                            </delurk>

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by Lurker64

                              Thompson could win the next 5 superbowls and some people would still want to rip on them, the best bet is to just ignore those people.
                              Did you read my "conclusion" on page 1? I said I will be willing to admit that Thomson is a better gm than Sherman IF the Packer win a SB within 4 yrs with Thompson as gm.
                              MIKE SHERMAN IS THE ONLY GM IN NFL HISTORY WHO NEVER MISSED THE PLAYOFFS

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by coolman3
                                Did you read my "conclusion" on page 1? I said I will be willing to admit that Thomson is a better gm than Sherman IF the Packer win a SB within 4 yrs with Thompson as gm.
                                Yes, and Woodbuck said he'd be ecstatic if the Packers went 8-8 this year. It's a "what have you done for me lately" world, nobody holds anybody to what they say on the internet.
                                </delurk>

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X