Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rough time at bargaining table

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Rough time at bargaining table

    The official source for NFL news, video highlights, fantasy football, game-day coverage, schedules, stats, scores and more.


    "Whatever (Cory) Williams was worth last September," said one league personnel man, "it's triple that now, and it can only get worse."

    No serious negotiations happened after Brandt resigned and before Ball set up his office.

    It appears the Packers will either tag Williams or get a late tird round pick for him next year as compensation.

  • #2
    I still think the tag would be a good way to go.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by JustinHarrell
      I still think the tag would be a good way to go.
      I agree. Harrell hasn't played like a starter thus far. The Packers need Williams.

      Comment


      • #4
        Completely agree; it's likely CW will be the top DL in free agency

        Tag him and at least get one more year from him to see if he takes another step. Worst case is we overpay him for a year.

        If he gets to FA he's gone
        TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

        Comment


        • #5
          How much cap room would he cost if tagged? I believe an exclusive franchise tag would pay him the average of the top 5 paid DTs for 2008, but a non-exclusive franchise tag would pay him the average of the top 5 paid DTs for 2007 but would allow him to negotiate with other teams, but I don't have any numbers. Isuppose tagging him is going to come down to whether or not Ted plans on pursuing any potentially expensive free agents this offseason, as well as what the coaching staff (who knows more than we do) thinks of Harrell's progress.
          </delurk>

          Comment


          • #6
            Let him go. He is avg at best, Teddy won't spend it anyway.
            Chris: Dad, what's the blow-hole for?
            Peter: I'll tell you what it's not for, son. And when I do, you'll understand why I can never go back to Sea World.

            Comment


            • #7
              john jolly is better

              Comment


              • #8
                I would not expect Thompson to spend that much on keeping Williams. Main reason being that even with him, the D-line was not able to pressure the opposing QB on any of the good teams that the Packers played against anyway. I think and would actually hope, that Thompson will either give Harrell a chance to step up, and/or draft a promising young DT. He could also just give Williams a tender that would at least get the Packers a draft pick if he leaves. I honestly do not think that Williams is worth a franchise tag, and if he is the best DT available, it is simply by default.

                It is also my opinion, that Williams is at best a secondary concern compared to our problem with the interior O-line. I do not care if Thompson does it with Free Agency or if he addresses it in the draft, the O-line needs to be fixed. The pocket collapsed far to often last year, and I will say it again........Favre made our Guards look far better than they were, simply by getting rid of the ball quickly, and by doing an outstanding job of avoiding the sack.

                Other than that, I think Nutz said it best, when he talked about what an excellent opportunity this off season will be for Thompson to simply improve the teams depth. If nothing else, we should all expect the Packers to be even better next season if Thompson simply went that route, and improves the teams depth. At the very least, that is what I expect to see, and anything more than that will be more than enough to make me happy.

                Comment


                • #9
                  He could also just give Williams a tender that would at least get the Packers a draft pick if he leaves.

                  Which tender ?

                  He is an UFA. The only "tender" possible which would give us a draft pick if he leaves is the non-exclusive franchise tag.


                  Personally I think it is a good idea to tag him. Even if we sign 2 big time free agents it should be possible to tag him:

                  We have about 20millions left, with some cuts and restructuring it will be about 22-25million effectively. We can sign 3 guys for about 6million yearly and still sign our draft picks and have a little extra.

                  The tag is about 6,5 millions. Lets asume we give 1 guy a 20million sign bonus for 5 years and one guy 10millions for 3 years. That would lead to tag values of roughly 6 and 4,5 millions in year 1 with reasenable low base salaries.

                  Next year Williams will be gone, we free up 6,5 millions from the cap, Brett retires, we gain another 11millions, the cap goes up again and we sit again 20millions below the cap. So we dont mortify the future.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    A one year rental is hardly hurting anything with our current cap if you are indeed letting him walk next year, KGB may be going with him. The fact that Allen, Haynesworth, Suggs, etc. are all getting tagged seems the bigger problem. If CW is on the market with all threee of those better players (IMO) his FA price is not nearly what it will be this year if he's out there on his own. Drop the franchise on him and I would hope a couple of those names do reach FA next year, not to mention some others like Vandenbosch, etc. Pay him for the one year. See if Harrell, Jolly, Muir, Cole, the potential draftees, etc might make CW less necessary next season. Then worry about this mess after 08', I have a feeling we'll be in a much better negotiating place.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      let him go

                      we have pickett, whose our best DT, then we have jolly and cole, both are very good.

                      then theres last years #1 pick whose also a DT.

                      we have more then enough talent at DT

                      CW is good, but nowhere near as good as a franchise tag. one of the top 5 DT's in the nfl? not by a long shot

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Only one of CW's 7 sacks came after he was inserted in the starting lineup following Jolly's injury. He has proven to be a very good rotational player, but becomes less effective the more he plays. Is this the kind of guy you franchise? I doubt it, especially when you have a 1st round pick waiting in the wings.
                        I can't run no more with that lawless crowd
                        While the killers in high places say their prayers out loud
                        But they've summoned, they've summoned up a thundercloud
                        They're going to hear from me - Leonard Cohen

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          6.5 for a guy who got 1 sack and 14 tackles in his last 8 games as a starter is a tad steep imo. I hope he goes if he only stays if we over pay him.
                          Pass Jessica's Law and keep the predators behind bars for 25 years minimum. Vote out liberal, SP judges. Enforce all immigrant laws!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I think JoeM is right, as a situational player, Williams excelled at putting pressure on the QB. I don't think T2 will be paying the following money on a situational player. The amounts below are for non-exclusive Franchise Players I believe:

                            from the Nashville Tennessean
                            By PAUL KUHARSKY • Staff Writer • February 7, 2008
                            http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs....9/1027/RSS0201

                            HOW TOP FIVE AVERAGE IS DETERMINED

                            2007 DT salaries that determine 2008 franchise number, according to the NFL Players Association:
                            Player | Team | Millions
                            Dewayne Robertson: Jets $7.391
                            Warren Sapp: Raiders $6.297
                            Cornelius Griffin: Redskins $6.166
                            Albert Haynesworth: Titans $6.041
                            Rod Coleman: Falcons $5.917

                            FRANCHISE TAG FACTS

                            Franchise tag salaries for 2008 by position:
                            Position | Millions
                            Quarterback $10.73
                            Cornerback $9.465
                            Defensive end $8.879
                            Linebacker $8.065
                            Wide receiver $7.848
                            Offensive line $7.455
                            Defensive tackle $6.363
                            Running back $6.538
                            Tight end $4.522
                            Safety $4.396
                            Kicker/punter $2.514[/b]
                            Bud Adams told me the franchise he admired the most was the Kansas City Chiefs. Then he asked for more hookers and blow.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by red
                              let him go

                              we have pickett, whose our best DT, then we have jolly and cole, both are very good.

                              then theres last years #1 pick whose also a DT.

                              we have more then enough talent at DT

                              CW is good, but nowhere near as good as a franchise tag. one of the top 5 DT's in the nfl? not by a long shot
                              Cole is very good
                              TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X