Tweet
Originally posted by KYPack
He is more a 3.
I'd rather take Flacco if we are going to pick someone in the second.
-
2nd is too high.
He is more a 3.
I'd rather take Flacco if we are going to pick someone in the second. -
Yeah, Flacco if he's there.Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
Don't think Woodson will last til day 2.
I'd go Flacco with either 2, Woodson if Flacco's gone & I think he will be.
TT'll probably draft 3 DT's with the first 3 picks, for all I know.Comment
-
Carr is the worst excuse the NFL has ever witnessed at the QB position. A pure pile of scared shit.Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB's
Comment
-
he does have good hair thoughOriginally posted by lod01Carr is the worst excuse the NFL has ever witnessed at the QB position. A pure pile of scared shit.Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB'sTo much of a good thing is an awesome thing
Comment
-
I could think of a few excuses that were even worse...but I agree with the general concept. David Carr is a horrible QB who has zero confidence, zero poise and zero anticipation.Originally posted by lod01My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?Comment
-
I think the general point made on page one is a good one: you need a vet to back up Rodgers, so you find someone who can come in and manage the offene if Rodgers is hurt, and you draft a rook to hold down the baseball-cap-wearing job as a third stringer. Thus you can draft more of a "project" guy.
I don't know the players, though, except for maybe having seen Ryan a couple times (I think he's very good, though I also thought David Carr was good in college) and Chad Henne more than that. I wouldn't be bummed if the Pack picked up Henne. But I'm not saying he's all that. I just think that he's got a good arm and a head for the game. Can't avoid a pass rush very well, though."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
Bottom line is we need another QB with an unpronounceable name.C.H.U.D.Comment
-
If we're picking a second Tedford QB, I think I'd rather have Harrington. Then again, we could get Carr, and Harrington to back up Rodgers, and then have three Tedford QBs...Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB's</delurk>Comment
-
The Tedford Trifecta could be unstoppable!Originally posted by Lurker64If we're picking a second Tedford QB, I think I'd rather have Harrington. Then again, we could get Carr, and Harrington to back up Rodgers, and then have three Tedford QBs...Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB'sTo much of a good thing is an awesome thing
Comment
-
Carr is not a tedford product. Tedford was long gone before Carr was even playing.Originally posted by Lurker64If we're picking a second Tedford QB, I think I'd rather have Harrington. Then again, we could get Carr, and Harrington to back up Rodgers, and then have three Tedford QBs...Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB'sComment
-
If we're going for a "name," then I say we go for that dude from Delaware - "Now playing quarterback for the Green Bay Packers - number 11 - Joe Flaccid!!"Originally posted by Freak Out
Thinking about that leaves me limp."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
Harrington is available. Oh no, Tank's sig might possibly happen!Originally posted by Lurker64If we're picking a second Tedford QB, I think I'd rather have Harrington. Then again, we could get Carr, and Harrington to back up Rodgers, and then have three Tedford QBs...Originally posted by GoPackGoMaybe TT will bring in David Carr to compete with Rodgers. Then we could have 2 tedford QB's
I'd like us to get a vet and a good kid that can be developed. I don't think Nall is worth the roster spot.
Gray
Carr
Harrington
Green
no Fumblinina
The kids? Sacco, Woodson or whoever.Comment
-
Somebody who can follow the hippocratic oath: do no harm.
Then draft a rook who has crazy potential but plays like he's in the schoolyard."The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."
KYPackComment
-
Totally in agreement with your last comment, GBR,Originally posted by GBRulzI think they would have probably drafted one anyhow. Do I think they should take one earlier now though? No. Take one in a later round but also bring in a couple vets to compete for the starting job. I guess I'm just not fine with the idea of just giving Arod the reigns just yet.
Then again, I don't care who our QB is at this point.
maybe Doug Pederson is free these days...he learned
a lot backing up Brett.Is it really a halo or
just a swelled head ?Comment
-
Todd McShay AND Mel Kiper today on espn radio said Woodson can still be grabbed well into round 3 and possibly as far down in round 5.Originally posted by KYPack"I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny MurraughComment
Comment