Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greatest WRs of All-Time

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I can't even fathom somebody who watched Rice and Moss saying Moss was the greatest they've seen.

    Rice caught every type of pass including going over the middle, turned simple slants into TDs, and was fearless.

    He turned what was a fantastic play..the one handed catch into the what is now the norm..or expected.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
      I can't even fathom somebody who watched Rice and Moss saying Moss was the greatest they've seen.
      I agree. Moss is the greatest deep threat I've ever seen, and I could see why someone might argue he is the most physically talented WR ever.

      However, Moss can't block and he refuses to run routes across the middle of the field. He also drops too many routine catches. I don't see how he really has any claim on being the greatest ever.
      My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by The Leaper
        Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
        I can't even fathom somebody who watched Rice and Moss saying Moss was the greatest they've seen.
        I agree. Moss is the greatest deep threat I've ever seen, and I could see why someone might argue he is the most physically talented WR ever.

        However, Moss can't block and he refuses to run routes across the middle of the field. He also drops too many routine catches. I don't see how he really has any claim on being the greatest ever.
        He does not refuse to run routes across the middle. That just doesn't fit his skills best or help the team the most. For example, he caught passes over the middle in the SB but we would all agree that Welker was better at that and it fit his skills better.

        Off this list, I don't understand T.O. being on there. What exactly has he done to put himself on this list? He drops too many, has no records, isn't known for anything special in my opinion. Of course I didn't think Irvin deserved the list either.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by mngolf19
          Originally posted by The Leaper
          Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
          I can't even fathom somebody who watched Rice and Moss saying Moss was the greatest they've seen.
          I agree. Moss is the greatest deep threat I've ever seen, and I could see why someone might argue he is the most physically talented WR ever.

          However, Moss can't block and he refuses to run routes across the middle of the field. He also drops too many routine catches. I don't see how he really has any claim on being the greatest ever.
          He does not refuse to run routes across the middle. That just doesn't fit his skills best or help the team the most. For example, he caught passes over the middle in the SB but we would all agree that Welker was better at that and it fit his skills better.

          Off this list, I don't understand T.O. being on there. What exactly has he done to put himself on this list? He drops too many, has no records, isn't known for anything special in my opinion. Of course I didn't think Irvin deserved the list either.
          Doesn't fit his skills...so, he is lacking in that area. If you are saying welker is better at it...you pretty much have lost the argument.

          rice ran every route, and did them all great.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by The Leaper
            Originally posted by Tyrone Bigguns
            I can't even fathom somebody who watched Rice and Moss saying Moss was the greatest they've seen.
            I agree. Moss is the greatest deep threat I've ever seen, and I could see why someone might argue he is the most physically talented WR ever.

            However, Moss can't block and he refuses to run routes across the middle of the field. He also drops too many routine catches. I don't see how he really has any claim on being the greatest ever.
            Plus he admittedly takes plays off during the game. Jerry Rice never took any plays off. He practiced every day as hard as he played. Moss may have more God given ability, but he's not in Jerry Rices class now or ever!
            If you're not a Packer fan, you're not a football fan!

            Comment


            • #21
              sorry there is just no argument whatsoever for moss over rice... there's just no fucking way.

              i hate(d) the 49ers more than anyone during that era and say what you want about his supporting cast but he pretty much made that supporting cast have the exact hue of greatness its currently perceived as having. he taught em how to prepare, how to work, how to practice, how to play, how to come through, how to win... he made every one of his teammates just that much better ... even joe. jerry rice IS the greatest WR ever.

              /thread

              Comment


              • #22
                Rice never got traded for a 4th rounder during his prime. Moss probably could have become the greatest ever. But he didn't. And he's not likely going to. He has issues.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by mission
                  sorry there is just no argument whatsoever for moss over rice... there's just no fucking way.

                  i hate(d) the 49ers more than anyone during that era and say what you want about his supporting cast but he pretty much made that supporting cast have the exact hue of greatness its currently perceived as having. he taught em how to prepare, how to work, how to practice, how to play, how to come through, how to win... he made every one of his teammates just that much better ... even joe. jerry rice IS the greatest WR ever.

                  /thread
                  Agreed. I remember distinctly watching him make a one handed catch on a go route up the sideline...it was like watching god play football...no one else was making catches like that regularly..it wasn't some excellent freak play like Free made.

                  And, who else made those slants across the middle look so easy...catching the ball in stride. It just wasn't fair to the defense...he could not be stopped.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by Noodle
                    He wasn't a Packer, but I can't take a top 10 WR list seriously if it doesn't have Freddie Biletnikoff. I mean c'mon, the man was the gold standard in an era where receivers just got the crap mugged out of them.

                    Plus, I remember the guy being a serious smoker, like a pack and a half a day kind of thing. He'd stub out a butt, slather on some stick-um, and make an absolutely sick catch to keep a drive going. This was when Giants Walked the Earth.
                    Here here, Noodle. Biletnikoff was my man, back in the day when I was a kid. Also, I think a name that is missing from the list is the Baltimore wide receiver - uh, Raymond .... somebody. You know, the dude that used to practice like a demon, running his routes over and over and over. Was called the best route-runner ever to play the game. Damn. What was his last name? Studious kind of guy.

                    I think the old-timers got shorted on this list. If Paul Warfeld hadn't been on it I was going to blow up my computer.
                    "The Devine era is actually worse than you remember if you go back and look at it."

                    KYPack

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      We'll just see where Jerry ranks when all his fans are long DEAD! What a screw job...

                      #14

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        A copy of a post I made in that old forum:

                        When these WR comparisons come up I always feel obliged to provide a history lesson in honor of my forum namesake, Don Hutson. So here is some info I just looked up on NFL.com.

                        Hutson played from 1935-45. In those 11 seasons he led the NFL in receiving yards 7 times and never finished lower than 3rd in that category. When he wasn't busy catching passes on offense he was busy catching them on defense. As a starting S he finished in the top 3 in the NFL in INT's 3 times.

                        In the years he led the league in receiving yards he often blew away his nearest competitor. Here are his numbers for those years with the second place total in parentheses:

                        1936 - 536 (414) and 8 TDs in 12 games
                        1938 - 548 (516) and 9 TDs in 10 games
                        1939 - 846 (550) and 6 TDs in 11 games
                        1941 - 738 (362) and 10 TDs in 11 games
                        1942 - 1211 (571) and 17 TDs in 11 games
                        1943 - 766 (537) and 11 TDs in 10 games
                        1944 - 866 (505) and 9 TDs in 10 games

                        As you can see, in '41 and '42 he more than doubled the yardage of the 2nd place receiver.

                        If you prorate his 1942 numbers out to a 16 game season you get the following totals:

                        108 catches for 1,762 yards and 25 TDs (not to mention 10 INT) which stands up well against any season you can find even in our more pass-happy era. By the way, that prorated 25 TDs would still beat the NFL record of 22 by Jerry Rice in a 16 game season, SIXTY-FIVE years after the fact.

                        His final career numbers: 488 catches for 7,991 yards and 99 TDs

                        The TD record stood for over 40 years until it was finally broken by Steve Largent.

                        In Jerry Rice's best season (1995) he had 122 catches for 1,848 yards. In that year the second highest yardage total was 1,781.

                        It is always difficult to compare stats across very different eras, but Hutson was clearly more dominant in his era than Rice was in his. And prorated out to a 16 game season Hutson's numbers are STILL very competive if not better than the best seasons of today (keeping in mind that rules have been changed over the years to make it much easier to throw the ball now).

                        Is it easier to play a shorter season from a physical standpoint? Maybe, but it's also more difficult physically to play offense and defense as Hutson did.

                        You make the call, but I would still vote for Hutson as the greatest receiver ever. If Moss has a couple years where he puts up 2,500 yards and 30 TD's, doubling the competition, then we'll talk.

                        By the way, all the balls he's holding in my avatar photo... one for each major NFL receiving record he held by the end of his career.
                        #14

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by DonHutson
                          By the way, all the balls he's holding in my avatar photo... one for each major NFL receiving record he held by the end of his career.
                          We need a picture like that for Favre.
                          My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Moss's play in Oakland is enough to knock him down a few notches. THere is no excuse, he as much as admitted that he took his ball and went home because things didn't go his way. Boo hoo. I don't care how physically talented he is, he'll never top my list.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by sharpe1027
                              Moss's play in Oakland is enough to knock him down a few notches. THere is no excuse, he as much as admitted that he took his ball and went home because things didn't go his way. Boo hoo. I don't care how physically talented he is, he'll never top my list.
                              Thats why I think moss shouldn't even be in this discussion. Quitters have no place among the legends. Had he went full blast his whole career I would put him up there but his raiders days showed his true colors.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Fritz
                                Originally posted by Noodle
                                He wasn't a Packer, but I can't take a top 10 WR list seriously if it doesn't have Freddie Biletnikoff. I mean c'mon, the man was the gold standard in an era where receivers just got the crap mugged out of them.

                                Plus, I remember the guy being a serious smoker, like a pack and a half a day kind of thing. He'd stub out a butt, slather on some stick-um, and make an absolutely sick catch to keep a drive going. This was when Giants Walked the Earth.
                                Here here, Noodle. Biletnikoff was my man, back in the day when I was a kid. Also, I think a name that is missing from the list is the Baltimore wide receiver - uh, Raymond .... somebody. You know, the dude that used to practice like a demon, running his routes over and over and over. Was called the best route-runner ever to play the game. Damn. What was his last name? Studious kind of guy.

                                I think the old-timers got shorted on this list. If Paul Warfeld hadn't been on it I was going to blow up my computer.
                                Raymond berry is the guy you are referring to.

                                Biletnikoff was a great receiver, but is far from the top ten. I loved him also as a kid, but a lot of this is because he was on a dominant team, he was a character, and was a great possession receiver.

                                But, our memories are from being kids. I always thought several raiders were the greatest..casper, stabler, guy..but, there are tons of guys with similar numbers.

                                For example, if you say biletnikoff...why not charlie joiner? Why not Drew Pearson. Why not cliff branch? Why not Isaac Curtis? why not Gene washington. Why not Bob Hayes..who really terrorized the league.

                                Biletnikoff is a HOF, but he is far from being a top ten receiver. He might be a top ten possession receiver.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X