Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Speculation on GB's QB targets in draft

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Speculation on GB's QB targets in draft

    PFW:
    April 4, 2008
    Packers target backup for Rodgers in draft

    There are many in league circles who thought the Packers might have acquired a veteran clipboard carrier by now via trade or free agency to back up new starting QB Aaron Rodgers, whose durability has to be a major concern, considering he’s already suffered two season-ending injuries in limited play. But the way we hear it, it appears the Packers might have been planning all along to find a quality backup for Rodgers in the upcoming draft. They believe the ’08 draft is deep enough at the QB position to unearth a first-day talent similar to Trent Edwards, who turned out to be a great third-round pick for the Bills in ’07. One online draft prognosticator actually has the Packers selecting Louisville’s Brad Brohm with their first pick near the end of the first round (30th overall). But our sources have a hard time envisioning that scenario. “If they take a QB No. 1, the position would become more of an open competition, and I don’t think they want to put Rodgers in that kind of situation,” one veteran team insider told PFW. But drafting a quarterback such as Delaware’s Joe Flacco or Michigan’s Chad Henne with their second or third pick is a much different story. “That’s got potential,” the source said, “especially with the ammo they have that could allow them to move up (the 56th and 60th overall picks, in the second round).”
    more freedom, less government. Go Sarah!

  • #2
    I certainly hope and think Thompson won't take a QB on the first day, preferably not in the 4th round either.

    Either Nall or some other cheap veteran will undoubtedly be the backup. Having a young prospect is not a bad idea and indeed, sort of a Packer tradition. However, that is only a good idea if it's a low round sleeper pick--which is what I would expect.
    What could be more GOOD and NORMAL and AMERICAN than Packer Football?

    Comment


    • #3
      i have no problem with us taking a qb in the first day, or the first round.
      Busting drunk drivers in Antarctica since 2006

      Comment


      • #4
        I would be happy with a first round or second round QB as well. Joe Flacco has a lot of potential. If Thompson thinks a legit QB is there and believes he's better than any other player on the board, I don't think he should pass just because of Aaron Rodgers. I'm as hopefull of Rodgers as the next guy but I'm not ready to put all of our eggs in his basket.
        Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

        Comment


        • #5
          We get Flacco with one of the 2's or the 3rd & a June 1 cut down veteran (One of Tampa's mebbe) & I'm happy.

          Comment


          • #6
            I'd be happy with Flacco fairly early, but I just plain do not want Brohm. Not even on day 2. Brohm's a system QB with questionable leadership and questionable intestinal fortitude.
            </delurk>

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't think it would hurt Aaron Rodgers to draft a QB VERY high this year. It would send him a message. Produce or we're going in a different direction.

              And as PFW says, he's had 2 season ending injuries in 2 years hardly playing at all.
              more freedom, less government. Go Sarah!

              Comment


              • #8
                I don't see them drafting a QB in the first 2 rounds, but if Flacco or Booty or Brohm or some other 2nd round talent falls to the 3rd I could see us taking one there. If they really are looking for a guy that could be our #2 right away I don't think they should wait any longer than our compensatory pick at the end of the 4th round.
                Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                Comment


                • #9
                  I don't know a thing about this Flacco character, but I get this feeling he will suck in the NFL. Every year there's a buzz surrounding some relatively unknown QB heading into the draft, and that player usually ends up bombing in the NFL.
                  "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    I don't know a thing about this Flacco character, but I get this feeling he will suck in the NFL. Every year there's a buzz surrounding some relatively unknown QB heading into the draft, and that player usually ends up bombing in the NFL.
                    Cutler recently is a notable exception. Small school guy with an unspectacular college career who had tremendous "buzz", "upside", "potential", and "intangibles" who has played pretty well in the NFL.
                    </delurk>

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Does anyone think highly of getting Josh Johnson from University of San Diego? The guy was pretty good in college, albeit at a lesser program. Could be a sleeper pick.
                      "Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." -Daniel Patrick Moynihan

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Lurker64
                        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                        I don't know a thing about this Flacco character, but I get this feeling he will suck in the NFL. Every year there's a buzz surrounding some relatively unknown QB heading into the draft, and that player usually ends up bombing in the NFL.
                        Cutler recently is a notable exception. Small school guy with an unspectacular college career who had tremendous "buzz", "upside", "potential", and "intangibles" who has played pretty well in the NFL.
                        but Cutler played at an SEC school, at least he played against the top competition in College football

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Lurker64
                          Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                          I don't know a thing about this Flacco character, but I get this feeling he will suck in the NFL. Every year there's a buzz surrounding some relatively unknown QB heading into the draft, and that player usually ends up bombing in the NFL.
                          Cutler recently is a notable exception. Small school guy with an unspectacular college career who had tremendous "buzz", "upside", "potential", and "intangibles" who has played pretty well in the NFL.
                          Since when is Vanderbilt a small school?
                          Teamwork is what the Green Bay Packers were all about. They didn't do it for individual glory. They did it because they loved one another.
                          Vince Lombardi

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Badgerinmaine
                            Since when is Vanderbilt a small school?
                            They're certainly small when it comes to "success in college football in recent memory" which was largely what I was thinking of.
                            </delurk>

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I am sold that Brohm will be a very good player, and I like Henne and Ainge in round 3+. Both of those guys have the kind of potential to be pretty good.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X