Frankly, Ted's risk is up front.
Would an old vet (Frerotte, Brunell, Testaverde type) be a better back up than Brohm??
For awhile. Certainly for a year.
The long term success of the franchise is having a quality guys like Brohm developing.
Ted likes competition at all positions. QB should be no different (Brett's gone).
Rodgers will not lose his job to Brohm. The Packers do need a new developing QB. If anything (knock on wood) happens to Rodgers you need someone.
In two years this will be a considered a wise pick.
Would an old vet (Frerotte, Brunell, Testaverde type) be a better back up than Brohm??
For awhile. Certainly for a year.
The long term success of the franchise is having a quality guys like Brohm developing.
Ted likes competition at all positions. QB should be no different (Brett's gone).
Rodgers will not lose his job to Brohm. The Packers do need a new developing QB. If anything (knock on wood) happens to Rodgers you need someone.
In two years this will be a considered a wise pick.


Comment