Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What was Thompson thinking?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What was Thompson thinking?

    Thompson says he'll trade back if he has many players rated equally and is going back a short enough distance where he knows he can get one of the equally high players rated on his board. If he can't trade back he takes the guy he needs most. He'll trade up if the quality is there. With that in mind and listening to the post draft press conferences, here's what I think happened and what it means.


    Jordy Nelson - The Packers didn't need a reciever at all. Based on what Thompson says, he had a few players rated equally so they felt moving back would allow them to pick up an extra pick and get one of the equally rated players. I think Thompson fell in love with Nelson similarly to the way he fell in love with Harrell last year. He didn't want to take an equally rated player at a positoin of need so he dropped back knowing the other guys would get scooped up and he could take the guy he wanted all along. Result, Jordy Nelson is a Packer.
    VALUE - Solid value. Thompson loved him and Thompson seems great with WR's. Expect a borderline probowler.

    Brian Brohm - Thompson and McCarthy had him rated very high. They said they tried to move up, but luckily he ended up falling in their lap. I think the Packers feel very fortunate to have him for a late 2nd round pick.
    VALUE - McCarthy loved him. Expect true competition starting next year.

    Patrick Lee - I think there were probably multiple players rated equally, but the Packers need a CB so badly that rather than entertaining offers, they just take the guy they really need and move on. They don't "need" too many extra picks so they make a decisoin that isn't value concious, but rather need concious (the kind I dread because often times they don't live up to their draft position).
    VALUE - Poor value. The Packers needed him. Expect a ST's player that never lives up to his draft status. Don't expect much more than you do of Finley or Jeremy Thompson.

    Jermichael Finley - Again, like with Patrick Lee, the Packers really needed a TE. They had a couple players available but they don't "NEED" more picks so they just take the guy that their roster needs the most. This again is not a value decision, it's a need decision
    VALUE - Moderate value. Thompson said they wanted a TE but only if it made sense. It must have made sense. High potential guyt that could be a probowler and could impregnate 7 females and end up in jail for beating one of them.

    Jeremy Thompson - With the Finley decision, I think they had a couple players rated the same. One of the others is this guy. 11 picks after they selected Finley, they move up 11 picks to get this guy. I think he and Finley were on the same tier. Thompson took the need first and moved up to take the other later. I think we can consider these two equally rated prospects.
    VALUE - Really good value for the spot. Thompson had to feel he was the best available. Probably just as good of a prospect as Finley even though picked later.

    Josh Sitton - A Ted Thompson special. He's sick of moving down. He loves his small school kids. He takes the best player, but since there are many he takes the on that fits need most. He wants more competition at OG. He's sick of the mediocrity.
    VALUE - Solid value. Later in the draft, Thompson said it didn't make sense to keep moving back. He wanted higher picks next year, but couldn't get them so he took a guard to compete with the guys we have.

    Breno Giacomini - The Packers really need a tackle. The way their board works out, they finially get a chance to take one. Why not take another high potential, high risk guy similar to Tony Moll a few years ago.
    VALUE - OK, Thompson will never do anytyhing stupid, but this is a bit of a need pick. Could easily be rated the same as Flynn or Swain.

    Matt Flynn - Right now, the Packers don't even want another QB, but they can't believe Flynn is still here. Thompson said in his presser that he couldn't believe the guys that were still available late in the draft. He really doesn't want this position, but he can't pass him up.
    VALUE Great value. The Packers don't even want him, but have to take him because they feel he's too good to pass up

    Brett Swain - The last thing the Packers need right now is a WR, but they had him rated in the 5th round and at this point they have no choice. They have to take him just because they feel he's too good to pass up.
    VALUE - Best value in the draft. They don't want him at all because they have so many good WR's. Based on them picking him, I think he has a chance to beat out Ruvell and Robinson. I woudln't be surpised if next years WR's are Driver, Jennings, Nelson, Jones and Swain. Thompson said he couldn't believe who was available at the end. I think this is another he was talking about.


    Like with the Bradon Jackson and Colledge picks, I think there are a few streches here, but Thompson is good at evaluationg talent and I'm sure he wont' reach too badly. I just don't expect Lee and Giacomini to live up to their draft positions and I think Finley has a higher bust rate than the typcical Thompson pick but he over-looked it to fill a need. I also think all of the attention he's getting is going to his head a bit. He feels he can do no wrong so swayed more than usual from what got him here.
    Formerly known as JustinHarrell.

  • #2
    Nice post JH. I like how you try and get into TT's pysche. I bet you got close on a few of your observations, particularly on Nelson, Flynn and Swain.

    I enjoyed the read. Thanks!

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: What was Thompson thinking?

      Originally posted by JustinHarrell
      Patrick Lee - I think there were probably multiple players rated equally, but the Packers need a CB so badly that rather than entertaining offers, they just take the guy they really need and move on. They don't "need" too many extra picks so they make a decisoin that isn't value concious, but rather need concious (the kind I dread because often times they don't live up to their draft position).

      VALUE - Poor value. The Packers needed him. Expect a ST's player that never lives up to his draft status. Don't expect much more than you do of Finley or Jeremy Thompson.
      What? Maybe you expect that. Others would disagree. Kind of funny how the guy you don't like is poor value. Nobody has any idea where Lee was on their board. As far as we know, Nelson, Brohm, Lee could have been #28, #29, and #30 on their board.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: What was Thompson thinking?

        Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
        Originally posted by JustinHarrell
        Patrick Lee - I think there were probably multiple players rated equally, but the Packers need a CB so badly that rather than entertaining offers, they just take the guy they really need and move on. They don't "need" too many extra picks so they make a decisoin that isn't value concious, but rather need concious (the kind I dread because often times they don't live up to their draft position).

        VALUE - Poor value. The Packers needed him. Expect a ST's player that never lives up to his draft status. Don't expect much more than you do of Finley or Jeremy Thompson.
        What? Maybe you expect that. Others would disagree. Kind of funny how the guy you don't like is poor value. Nobody has any idea where Lee was on their board. As far as we know, Nelson, Brohm, Lee could have been #28, #29, and #30 on their board.
        I agree with Harvey. I think your analysis is greatly influenced by your own opinion of the players drafted.

        Why did the Packers "need a CB so badly"? Sure, they can always use CBs, everyone can, but they are better off there than they were a few years ago. The team had bigger, more immediate needs than cornerbacks right now.

        Probably their biggest need was QB, they had Rodgers and no one after him, at all. After QB, TE was probably their next biggest need, again because they have no one after the starter. Thereafter, OT perhaps even more than CB, especially at left OT where no one has much experience. At least the returning CBs have some experience.

        By selecting a CB high, and before more immediate needs at TE and OT suggests that the player picked was perceived as a high value player at that spot by TT.

        Comment


        • #5
          I also honestly think that Sitton wasn't as good value as Giacomini. Virtually everyone and their dog thought that Giacomini should be drafted in the fifth round as a project with a lot of upside. Virtually everyone had Sitton going undrafted.

          The difference, of course, is that Sitton might be able to play more this year, but it's not like the Sitton pick didn't come out of "WTF-Nowhere" at the time, since there were much "higher rated" OL on the board, ESPN didn't have any d-roll on the guy, most draft "experts" had the guy undrafted, and Scouts Inc. didn't even have a bio of the guy.

          I'm not sure where you get that one is a value and the other isn't. I also think that your ratings are greatly influenced by your personal opinions of these players, particularly your apparent dislike of Patrick Lee. I know if you ask scouts, Flowers gets a much higher grade than Lee (after all he was taken 25 spots earlier), but at the same time if you're asking scouts and say "I need a cornerback to not start, but to groom to play press coverage", Lee gets a much higher rathing that Terrell Thomas, Terrence Wheatly, Charles Godfrey, or Chevis Jackson. Even though this was a "deep" class at Cornerback, all these guys had their warts. You could pick apart any of the corner prospects if you wanted to.
          </delurk>

          Comment


          • #6
            Nice, thoughtful post..It's obviously biased, as some have pointed out..But hey, we're allowed to be..We're not journalists and we all have opinions and expressing them is what this message board is for...

            I disagree with the value you placed on Lee..I think that's right about where he should have been drafted and should get significant playing time behind Al Harris and Charles Woodson..

            I also disagree with Finley..I think that pick was a great value in the third round..Mel Kiper's Hair says that if he had stayed at Texas a year longer rather than come out after his redshirt sophomore season, he would have been a first round pick..

            Comment


            • #7
              It's all interesting speculation, but all that really matters now is how they look once the pads go on, and how they develop. Their ours.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: What was Thompson thinking?

                Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                Jermichael Finley - Again, like with Patrick Lee, the Packers really needed a TE. They had a couple players available but they don't "NEED" more picks so they just take the guy that their roster needs the most. This again is not a value decision, it's a need decision
                VALUE - Moderate value. Thompson said they wanted a TE but only if it made sense. It must have made sense. High potential guyt that could be a probowler and could impregnate 7 females and end up in jail for beating one of them.
                Before the draft you thought this was Ted's guy and he was drooling over him. Since we got him, I'd say that you were right and this pick is very good value. Many thought that he shouldn't have come out this early and would have easily been a first day pick next year.

                I also think that Lee is probably the best athlete we drafted this year and will either boom or bust, not stick around and be a mediocre special teamer. We'll see if his light go on but he sounds like a guy that fits our defense and could wind up being a stud.
                70% of the Earth is covered by water. The rest is covered by Al Harris.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: What was Thompson thinking?

                  Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                  Jermichael Finley - High potential guyt that could be a probowler and could impregnate 7 females and end up in jail for beating one of them.
                  Hahah, you can't get that kind of analysis from ESPN!!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: What was Thompson thinking?

                    Originally posted by MadtownPacker
                    Originally posted by JustinHarrell
                    Jermichael Finley - High potential guyt that could be a probowler and could impregnate 7 females and end up in jail for beating one of them.
                    Hahah, you can't get that kind of analysis from ESPN!!

                    Were the National Enquirer of the sports world.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Scott Campbell
                      It's all interesting speculation, but all that really matters now is how they look once the pads go on, and how they develop. Their ours.
                      Indeed, I remember Hodge was a "value" pick in the 3rd round two years ago, but hasn't been able to develop due to injury. Hopefully he can come back this TC and pan out. Can't wait to start seeing all these new guys throw down.
                      sigpic

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Hodge was the next coming of Brian Urlacher. He took over for Barnett and pushed Barnett to the outside. Oh wait, that was the speculation then that never came true.

                        Although I agree with some of what JH said, it is just that, pure speculation along with hints of personal bias.

                        I agree, let the pads get put on before we go crowning anyone or changing your nickname to one.
                        "Once the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the Republic.”
                        – Benjamin Franklin

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Merlin
                          Hodge was the next coming of Brian Urlacher. He took over for Barnett and pushed Barnett to the outside. Oh wait, that was the speculation then that never came true.

                          Although I agree with some of what JH said, it is just that, pure speculation along with hints of personal bias.

                          I agree, let the pads get put on before we go crowning anyone or changing your nickname to one.
                          I guess this is exactly why I took a step back in terms of the draft. We all got worked up over Hodge and began to speculate about the move to the outside for Barnett. In reality Hodge wasn't even good enough for the coaches to even consider that move.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Merlin
                            Hodge was the next coming of Brian Urlacher.
                            What?

                            When did Hodge play safety at Iowa?
                            My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I'm still hopeful Hogde will push Barnett outside...

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X