Marvin harrison involved in shooting? yeas that marvin

[]{ilr]3]

Is choking your own ok?

What? You mean that its not?
Uh oh......

[BallHawk]

Is choking your own ok?

Nice double entendre, Zig.

[Rastak]

Seems like a lot of conjecture to me. I think I'll wait to hear the facts on the case.

Lots of conjecture.


1) Guy fights with Harrison.
2) Guy is shot minutes later.
3) Gun found on Harrison's property and ballistics show that gun was used.

Yea, that's a huge leap.....

[MJZiggy]

I thought they matched the bullets at the crime scene to his gun?

[HarveyWallbangers]

Seems like a lot of conjecture to me. I think I'll wait to hear the facts on the case.

Lots of conjecture.


1) Guy fights with Harrison.
2) Guy is shot minutes later.
3) Gun found on Harrison's property and ballistics show that gun was used.

Yea, that's a huge leap.....

Let's see. The original report said nothing about the gun being Harrison's gun or that it was found on Harrison's property.

This is what it said:

Ballistic tests showed that the bullets came from a custom-made Belgian gun. Harrison owns one of the guns in question.

This is a lot different then saying it was Harrison's gun and it was found on his property.

[Rastak]

Not sure who said what when but.....

Police then went to a Philadelphia car wash owned by Harrison to question him about the gun. Harrison admitted owning such a weapon but claimed it never left his suburban Philadelphia home.

However, WIP's source said the gun was discovered in a bucket at the car wash, and tests showed that it had fired seven bullets that matched those found at the scene.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3378829

[MadtownPacker]

Why you defending this guy for Harvey?? He aint darren sharper. Even if he wasnt the one he was likely rolling with the person who did it. Did you read the reports above?? He aint the guy I thought he was I can tell you that. I viewed him as the anti TO. Something aint right no matter what happened with the shooting. Just seems like he likes going off on what is bothering him.

[Rastak]

Why you defending this guy for Harvey?? He aint darren sharper. Even if he wasnt the one he was likely rolling with the person who did it. Did you read the reports above?? He aint the guy I thought he was I can tell you that. I viewed him as the anti TO. Something aint right no matter what happened with the shooting. Just seems like he likes going off on what is bothering him.

Yea, he sure does. I can't believe some dude with that much coin would be shooting at someone after a fight. WTF. You got so much to lose and what to gain?

Society is pretty much screwed up now. Used to be a man settled his differences with his fists when words didn't cut it. Now, you fire a gun like a chicken shit.

Fucking cowards.

[HarveyWallbangers]

I'm not defending him. I haven't had time to read details. The original report wasn't conclusive at all. That's all I was saying.

[The Leaper]

Ballistic tests showed that the bullets came from a custom-made Belgian gun. Harrison owns one of the guns in question.

This is a lot different then saying it was Harrison's gun and it was found on his property.

Well, what the report basically is saying is that tests showed the gun used came from a VERY RARE GUN...which also just happens to be owned by the guy who owns the bar and was in the argument with the victim.

I dunno...you do the math. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the chances Marvin's gun is the same one that was used are about 99.5%.

While not entire conclusive, it is pretty close to being conclusive...at least in terms of the weapon in question. Of course, who actually fired the weapon is certainly in question.

[HarveyWallbangers]

Ballistic tests showed that the bullets came from a custom-made Belgian gun. Harrison owns one of the guns in question.

This is a lot different then saying it was Harrison's gun and it was found on his property.

Well, what the report basically is saying is that tests showed the gun used came from a VERY RARE GUN...

The report above doesn't say a "VERY RARE GUN". It says it's from a "custom-made Belgian gun". That may rare or not. There are Belgian gun manufacturers. As far as the media is concerned, any gun made by that manufacturer could be custom-made as far as they know.

I haven't read one story about the case. Maybe I've become immune to these cases, but I'm going to wait until the facts are all out and a decision has been made in the case.

[Tyrone Bigguns]

Ballistic tests showed that the bullets came from a custom-made Belgian gun. Harrison owns one of the guns in question.

This is a lot different then saying it was Harrison's gun and it was found on his property.

Well, what the report basically is saying is that tests showed the gun used came from a VERY RARE GUN...which also just happens to be owned by the guy who owns the bar and was in the argument with the victim.

I dunno...you do the math. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the chances Marvin's gun is the same one that was used are about 99.5%.

While not entire conclusive, it is pretty close to being conclusive...at least in terms of the weapon in question. Of course, who actually fired the weapon is certainly in question.

While i am pretty much a "don't jump to conclusions" kinda guy...witness my stance on Sean Taylor...i gotta say this is a huge "coincidence."

A rare gun...how many guys you think have that exact model? I'm not sayin harrison did it, but i'm guessing he is pretty involved. Maybe his posse.

[red]

well, to my knowledge. when they do a ballistics test on the bullets and the used casing, they match it to an exact gun, not just a type or model of gun.

every single gun has a different ballastic patern like a finger print

the fired sheel matched to harrisons gun, not just a gun like harrisons


at least thats what i understand

we need a gun expert. where the hell is tex, he's gotta own thousands of guns

[the_idle_threat]

If they were just matching to the type of gun, rather than Harison's specific gun, they'd only need to look at the shell casings (this is not true in all cases, but see below). Ballistics tests are more specific---they purport to name the specific gun that fired the shots, just like red described above.

In this case, the gun has been identified in this article:

http://www.philly.com/dailynews/top_story/20080503_NFL_star_s_gun_linked_to_N__Philly_shooting.html

as an FN 5.7.

I've been around a lot of guns, but I've not heard of this gun before. Did a little research, and found that it's commercially available. It fires a proprietary round---5.7x28mm---so this is not the kind of situation where it was plain ol' 9mm or .22 that could have been fired from all kinds of makes and models.

Pretty stupid to commit a crime using a rare gun that fires proprietary rounds---the evidence against Harrison is pretty damning.

At this point, he's on the hook unless someone else pulled the trigger on his rare gun.

[woodbuck27]

Whatever.