Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

2005 First Round BUSTS

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by sheepshead
    You can dissect any first round in history and get virtually the same result.

    Get Out Now TT!
    I guess I have to respectfully disagree... I thought I would test your theory and I chose the 2004 draft class and in my opinion, it is not really close.

    Every year, you hear the day after the draft who were the winners and who were the losers. It is widely believed that you can not fairly judge a draft class until they have had five years in the league...


    Please note that in this article the author makes a decision on whether the pick was a win or a loss for the team that drafted him. I would consider this slightly different from a player being a bust. For example, I would not consider Kellen Winslow a bust, it just didn't work out in Cleveland

    Comment


    • #47
      Saying Rodgers could still be a bust completely devalues your list if that is your opinion.

      The kid had his first season as a starter in the shadow of an iconic legend and a titanic PR mess...and was extremely successful by all accounts, on and off the field.

      No chance is pick #24 a bust.
      My signature has NUDITY in it...whatcha gonna do?

      Comment


      • #48
        That '04 draft looks pretty darn good now! Three franchise QB's - and, arguably, none of them were the best player in the draft. That would be Fitzgerald!

        At least half the first round picks became solid contributors. So a big UGH to #25!!!
        --
        Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...

        Comment

        Working...
        X