Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Packers still have best offense in North with Rodgers

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Bretsky
    Regardless of how it went down the Bears were idiots for letting him go; he's better than any WR in Chicago or in MN last year.
    Yes. He was also the 2nd best UFA WR behind Moss. Bryant Johnson could also be considered here, but they both (Berrian and Johnson) have more upside than Porter or Walker (also UFA's during off season) at this point. The Vikings needed help at WR, and I'm not saying Berrian will be great, but he will be better than Wade, or Ferguson. The hope is that he will stretch the field and help allieveate the 8 and 9 man fronts.
    Minnesota Vikings
    NFC North Champions 2008 and 2009.

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by SMACKTALKIE
      Yes. He was also the 2nd best UFA WR behind Moss. Bryant Johnson could also be considered here, but they both.
      When your competition is Bryant Johnson, that ain't saying much. (Although I do like Johnson, I think he'll be better than Berrian.) Of course, the Vikings paid him like he was a Pro Bowler.
      "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

      Comment


      • #33
        Vikes had no choice. You have to try and upgrade the team and if he costs that much to make sure he comes to your team..... No he isn't a great receiver, but he doesn't have to be. If he puts up the same numbers he did in Chicago, he will be a giant upgrade over Williamson. And like I have said before, if Williamson had caught a few more balls thrown to him the Vikes would have won at least 2 more games last year. I still stand by my comparisons earlier.

        Comment

        Working...
        X