Whats more likely?

[LEWCWA]

Rodgers is the next Brian Griese, Jay Fieldler or Steve Young! Chances are he will be most like Griese. And we are pushing our very capable HOF QB out the door for that! Players like Favre come around once in a lifetime and we can't wait to see the new Rodgers show! Kind of like canceling MASH to get that new show China Beach on the air!

[arcilite]

Re: Whats more likely?

Rodgers is the next Brian Griese, Jay Fieldler or Steve Young! Chances are he will be most like Griese. And we are pushing our very capable HOF QB out the door for that! Players like Favre come around once in a lifetime and we can't wait to see the new Rodgers show! Kind of like canceling MASH to get that new show China Beach on the air!

Oh, ok buddy.

Want to show us where you keep your crystal ball that says Rodgers will be like Griese.


Fuck the Packers future! FAVRE 4 LYFE

[LEWCWA]

Chances are Rodgers numbers will compare better with Griese than Young. Thats an easy assumption players like Steve Young don't come around too often!

[HarveyWallbangers]

Chances are Rodgers numbers will compare better with Griese than Young. Thats an easy assumption players like Steve Young don't come around too often!

Chances are Favre's numbers will compare more favorably to his 2006 season than his 2007 season.

[sheepshead]

Re: Whats more likely?

Rodgers is the next Brian Griese, Jay Fieldler or Steve Young! Chances are he will be most like Griese. And we are pushing our very capable HOF QB out the door for that! Players like Favre come around once in a lifetime and we can't wait to see the new Rodgers show! Kind of like canceling MASH to get that new show China Beach on the air!

Man I was think a very similar thing today to create a poll.

Steve Young, Scott Hunter or use Feildler.


start a poll man

[sheepshead]

young

View Details For: 43 Regular Season and 8 Playoff TDs Scored / 233 Regular Season and 20 Playoff TDs Thrown
Passing
Glossary · ProBowl(*), 1st-team All-Pro(+), · CSV · PRE · GameLog · Playoffs · 100/300/100
Year Age Tm Pos G GS Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk%
1985 24 TAM qb 5 5 72 138 52.2 935 3 2.2 8 5.8 59 6.8 4.4 13.0 187.0 56.9 21 158 4.9 2.8 13.2
1986 25 TAM QB 14 14 195 363 53.7 2282 8 2.2 13 3.6 46 6.3 4.9 11.7 163.0 65.5 47 326 4.8 3.5 11.5
1987 26 SFO 8 3 37 69 53.6 570 10 14.5 0 0.0 50 8.3 9.7 15.4 71.3 120.8 3 25 7.6 9.0 4.2
1988 27 SFO 11 3 54 101 53.5 680 3 3.0 3 3.0 73 6.7 5.7 12.6 61.8 72.2 13 75 5.3 4.4 11.4
1989 28 SFO 10 3 64 92 69.6 1001 8 8.7 3 3.3 50 10.9 10.3 15.6 100.1 120.8 12 84 8.8 8.3 11.5
1990 29 SFO 6 1 38 62 61.3 427 2 3.2 0 0.0 34 6.9 7.2 11.2 71.2 92.6 8 41 5.5 5.8 11.4
1991 30 SFO QB 11 10 180 279 64.5 2517 17 6.1 8 2.9 97 9.0 8.3 14.0 228.8 101.8 13 79 8.3 7.7 4.5
1992*+ 31 SFO QB 16 16 268 402 66.7 3465 25 6.2 7 1.7 80 8.6 8.5 12.9 216.6 107.0 29 152 7.7 7.5 6.7
1993*+ 32 SFO QB 16 16 314 462 68.0 4023 29 6.3 16 3.5 80 8.7 7.8 12.8 251.4 101.5 31 160 7.8 7.0 6.3
1994*+ 33 SFO QB 16 16 324 461 70.3 3969 35 7.6 10 2.2 69 8.6 8.4 12.3 248.1 112.8 31 163 7.7 7.5 6.3
1995* 34 SFO QB 11 11 299 447 66.9 3200 20 4.5 11 2.5 57 7.2 6.5 10.7 290.9 92.3 25 115 6.5 5.9 5.3
1996* 35 SFO QB 12 12 214 316 67.7 2410 14 4.4 6 1.9 52 7.6 7.2 11.3 200.8 97.2 34 160 6.4 6.1 9.7
1997* 36 SFO QB 15 15 241 356 67.7 3029 19 5.3 6 1.7 82 8.5 8.3 12.6 201.9 104.7 35 220 7.2 7.0 9.0
1998* 37 SFO QB 15 15 322 517 62.3 4170 36 7.0 12 2.3 81 8.1 7.7 13.0 278.0 101.1 48 234 7.0 6.6 8.5
1999 38 SFO 3 3 45 84 53.6 446 3 3.6 4 4.8 53 5.3 3.5 9.9 148.7 60.9 8 63 4.2 2.5 8.7
Career 169 143 2667 4149 64.3 33124 232 5.6 107 2.6 97 8.0 7.4 12.4 196.0 96.8 358 2055 6.9 6.3 7.9




hunter

View Details For: 13 Regular Season TDs Scored / 23 Regular Season TDs Thrown
Passing
Glossary · ProBowl(*), 1st-team All-Pro(+), · CSV · PRE · Playoffs
Year Age Tm Pos G GS Cmp Att Cmp% Yds TD TD% Int Int% Lng Y/A AY/A Y/C Y/G Rate Sk Yds NY/A ANY/A Sk%
1971 24 GNB QB 13 10 75 163 46.0 1210 7 4.3 17 10.4 77 7.4 3.2 16.1 93.1 46.1 11 81 6.5 2.5 6.3
1972 25 GNB QB 14 14 86 199 43.2 1252 6 3.0 9 4.5 49 6.3 4.6 14.6 89.4 55.5 13 86 5.5 3.9 6.1
1973 26 GNB QB 8 5 35 84 41.7 442 2 2.4 4 4.8 30 5.3 3.4 12.6 55.3 46.8 10 89 3.8 2.1 10.6
1974 27 BUF 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0
1976 29 ATL QB 8 6 51 110 46.4 633 5 4.5 4 3.6 34 5.8 4.6 12.4 79.1 64.7 9 81 4.6 3.5 7.6
1977 30 ATL qb 7 7 70 151 46.4 898 2 1.3 3 2.0 49 5.9 5.2 12.8 128.3 61.6 11 88 5.0 4.3 6.8
1979 32 DET 13 0 18 41 43.9 321 1 2.4 1 2.4 82 7.8 7.0 17.8 24.7 69.3 4 33 6.4 5.6 8.9
Career 64 42 335 748 44.8 4756 23 3.1 38 5.1 82 6.4 4.4 14.2 74.3 55.0 58 458 5.3 3.5 7.2

[Bretsky]

Chances are Rodgers numbers will compare better with Griese than Young. Thats an easy assumption players like Steve Young don't come around too often!

Chances are Favre's numbers will compare more favorably to his 2006 season than his 2007 season.

Chances are so will the Packers record

[HarveyWallbangers]

Chances are Rodgers numbers will compare better with Griese than Young. Thats an easy assumption players like Steve Young don't come around too often!

Chances are Favre's numbers will compare more favorably to his 2006 season than his 2007 season.

Chances are so will the Packers record

Chances are so will the Packers record--even with Favre. Chances are they'll have a better record next year with Rodgers in his second year as a starter instead of being a first year starter.

[Chevelle2]

Chances are if Favre plays next season, he will throw a season ending interception in a brilliantly retarded playoff meltdown.

[arcilite]

Chances are I will go through 16 bottles of bourbon next season.

[Bretsky]

Chances are Rodgers numbers will compare better with Griese than Young. Thats an easy assumption players like Steve Young don't come around too often!

Chances are Favre's numbers will compare more favorably to his 2006 season than his 2007 season.

Chances are so will the Packers record

Chances are so will the Packers record--even with Favre. Chances are they'll have a better record next year with Rodgers in his second year as a starter instead of being a first year starter.

That is because Favre would be starting in 2009 as well

[LEWCWA]

It is as simple as this. I would rather watch Favre one more season than get a jump start on the mediocre career of Aaron Rodgers.

[LEWCWA]

Everyone looks to the Dallas performance as Rodgers coming out party! bfd he played pretty decent against a poor secondary and the team down big! The big difference between the 2, when Brett got his shot, he worked his magic and pulled out a unbelievable win. Rodgers just came close

[Chevelle2]

It is as simple as this. I would rather watch Favre one more season than get a jump start on the mediocre career of Aaron Rodgers.

You enjoy this?


@denver: 2 TOs
@sf: 2 INTs
@stl: 6 INTs
@phi: Hail Mary INT
ATL: 2 INTs
MIN: 4 INTs
NYG: 2 INTs

[GBRulz]

Who knows what is more likely, but why in the heck wouldn't you want Rodgers to be the next Steve Young?? I don't want a Brian Greasy!!