Originally posted by Pacopete4
Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
Originally posted by Pacopete4
So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
-TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
-Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
-Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
-Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
-Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.
You shouldn't quote 2 guys that have actually played the game and who have actually experience the NFL when there are people here that know way more about the situation and can tell you they know for a fact that Rodgers is better and deserves a chance..........


Comment