Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Teammates 'moving forward' with Favre

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Pacopete4
    Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
    Originally posted by Pacopete4
    So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
    No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

    -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
    -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
    -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
    -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
    -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

    You shouldn't quote 2 guys that have actually played the game and who have actually experience the NFL when there are people here that know way more about the situation and can tell you they know for a fact that Rodgers is better and deserves a chance..........
    I'm just the reporter here, but obviously we're definitely not the Internet GM's.
    Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

    Comment


    • #32
      Sharpe, I'm a firm believer that TT does not want Favre around.. he thinks he can get "his" own player to get the job done for him and win a superbowl and this was a perfect way to get favre outta here and let Arod play.. now that Favre wants back in, even though Favre is the better player, he is reluctant to do so because of his ego....

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Pacopete4
        Originally posted by Gunakor
        Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
        Originally posted by Pacopete4
        So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
        No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

        -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
        -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
        -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
        -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
        -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

        I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

        TT played for quite awhile in this league....
        So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
        Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

        Comment


        • #34
          Is it all that surprising that a couple of former players would support a player on an issue involving a player vs. an organization?
          "There's a lot of interest in the draft. It's great. But quite frankly, most of the people that are commenting on it don't know anything about what they are talking about."--Ted Thompson

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Gunakor
            Originally posted by Pacopete4
            Originally posted by Gunakor
            Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
            Originally posted by Pacopete4
            So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
            No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

            -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
            -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
            -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
            -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
            -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

            I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

            TT played for quite awhile in this league....
            So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
            That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
              Is it all that surprising that a couple of former players would support a player on an issue involving a player vs. an organization?
              NO it isn't. Its even less suprisng when it comes from FavreSPN employees.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                Is it all that surprising that a couple of former players would support a player on an issue involving a player vs. an organization?
                I agree Harv, they usually do side with the player.. but I also think they made sense in how stupid this has become... Bretts back, hes committed, hes a proven winner, best all time... get his ass on the field already and stop with the shenanigans.. its a joke already

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Pacopete4
                  Originally posted by Gunakor
                  Originally posted by Pacopete4
                  Originally posted by Gunakor
                  Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                  Originally posted by Pacopete4
                  So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                  No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                  -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                  -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                  -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                  -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                  -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                  I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                  TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                  So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                  That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                  My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                  Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pacopete4
                    Originally posted by HarveyWallbangers
                    Is it all that surprising that a couple of former players would support a player on an issue involving a player vs. an organization?
                    I agree Harv, they usually do side with the player.. but I also think they made sense in how stupid this has become... Bretts back, hes committed, hes a proven winner, best all time... get his ass on the field already and stop with the shenanigans.. its a joke already

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Gunakor
                      Originally posted by Pacopete4
                      Originally posted by Gunakor
                      Originally posted by Pacopete4
                      Originally posted by Gunakor
                      Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                      Originally posted by Pacopete4
                      So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                      No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                      -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                      -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                      -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                      -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                      -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                      I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                      TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                      So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                      That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                      My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                      I think TT is already driving that bus now.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by cpk1994
                        Originally posted by Gunakor
                        Originally posted by Pacopete4
                        Originally posted by Gunakor
                        Originally posted by Pacopete4
                        Originally posted by Gunakor
                        Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                        Originally posted by Pacopete4
                        So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                        No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                        -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                        -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                        -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                        -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                        -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                        I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                        TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                        So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                        That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                        My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                        I think TT is already driving that bus now.
                        cpk, unless you are going to join the chorus in that 13-3 last year was all due to Brett Favre - and I'm sure that's not how you feel - then give Thompson credit for the job he's done.
                        Chuck Norris doesn't cut his grass, he just stares at it and dares it to grow

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by cpk1994
                          Originally posted by Gunakor
                          Originally posted by Pacopete4
                          Originally posted by Gunakor
                          Originally posted by Pacopete4
                          Originally posted by Gunakor
                          Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                          Originally posted by Pacopete4
                          So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                          No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                          -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                          -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                          -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                          -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                          -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                          I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                          TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                          So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                          That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                          My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                          I think TT is already driving that bus now.
                          I think Sherman won 3 nfc north titles didnt he?.. not to shabby, and not saying I like him either but you cant rip the guy too badly

                          the GM of the 4-12 team was TT wasn't it?



                          and I agree... this team is headed back to Siberia the moment Favre is gone from GB forever..

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            You guys should watch the best of Mike and Mike today. Not sure when it's on, but they might air the interview of former Titans GM Reese. It was a different perspective that what the former players (Golic and Wiley) will give. He basically supported TT and commended Rodgers for how he's beenn handling the situation.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Originally posted by cpk1994
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Originally posted by Pacopete4
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Originally posted by Pacopete4
                              Originally posted by Gunakor
                              Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                              Originally posted by Pacopete4
                              So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                              No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                              -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                              -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                              -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                              -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                              -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                              I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                              TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                              So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                              That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                              My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                              I think TT is already driving that bus now.
                              cpk, unless you are going to join the chorus in that 13-3 last year was all due to Brett Favre - and I'm sure that's not how you feel - then give Thompson credit for the job he's done.
                              No what Im saying is that gutless wonders TT and M3 folding like cheap suits to Favre's demands means all that work with Rodgers is now up in smoke and the Packers will have NO QB after Favre. Which means back to the 80's.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by cpk1994
                                Originally posted by Gunakor
                                Originally posted by Pacopete4
                                Originally posted by Gunakor
                                Originally posted by Pacopete4
                                Originally posted by Gunakor
                                Originally posted by SnakeLH2006
                                Originally posted by Pacopete4
                                So if Favre had not retired... Rodgers would have zero complaint of backing up Favre again? but since Favre did, he now has the right to be bitter?... doesnt make sense... rodgers hasn't done squat in this league to be entitled to anything.. IMO there already shoulda been a competition, Rodgers vs Brohm vs Flynn
                                No doubt....WOW...anyone check out Sportcenter around 12:30 CST today, they did a 15 min. roundtable discussion with Marcellus Wiley and Mike Golic. Wow, did they toast Arod and TT. Here's a summary (don't flame me, it's their comments):

                                -TT has a massive ego, and they couldn't believe Murphy's comments about having to redo everything (Golic: It was 3 months, damn)
                                -Packers had a sub 40% winning % in 1972-1991 before Favre, then a 64% clip since 1992 when Favre took over (best in all the NFL)
                                -Based on talent, not politics, Favre would kill AR in a QB competition as they were saying that it is only phrased as such to appease Arod, but Favre will be the starting QB for sure.
                                -Both Wiley and Golic as NFL vets said it's sick that it came to this, but is totally a power trip from TT, but regardless as vets they say the players will want Favre to win as they know he's the far superior talent.
                                -Lots more stuff, maybe they replay it all day as normal, but hellaciously entertaining. I was laughing my ass off.

                                I don't give a flying fuck what players/former players have to say about this. PLAYERS ARE NOT GM'S. They should keep thier fucking mouths shut.

                                TT played for quite awhile in this league....
                                So should we just name Brett Favre our new GM because he played for quite awhile in this league also?
                                That'd be fine by me... as long as TT gets the fuck outta town

                                My guess is he'd run this team like his buddy Mike Sherman. He'd be as undisciplined a GM as he is a player. Welcome to Siberia again Paco. Enjoy the 80's.
                                I think TT is already driving that bus now.
                                Your kidding right? Ted Thompson does things the way he should. The problem with a head coach being the GM is they only see next year. The HC deals with now, the GM deals with next year, which is exactly what Ted does. his job, for the most part, this year is done until cuts come up. he's concerned with the future. If you think Ted Thompson is doing a bad job, you TRULY do not know anything about the NFL or how it should be ran. amazing how quickly we forget that probably 98% of the team that went 13-3 last year, was picked by Thompson. DAMN, what a shit job he is doing.
                                "I would love to have a guy that always gets the key hit, a pitcher that always makes his best pitch and a manager that can always make the right decision. The problem is getting him to put down his beer and come out of the stands and do those things." - Danny Murraugh

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X