Teammates 'moving forward' with Favre

[Pacopete4]

This is about committment to the TEAM, something Favre is totally lacking.

Ya, you're right... Favre's played injured, when his dad or other family members have died, given all his time and efforts in the community, and all the rest thats went along with it... aaaaaallllllll for himself, sure....

[Gunakor]

Then he should have let him play for the VIkings. Grow a set and show that one player is not above the team and behavior like that will not be tolerated.

So your solution is to give into Favre's demands? I fail to see how that is growing a pair. I also don't see how it shows anyone anything other than how stupid of a GM you are to get nothing in return for a player on your roster that several teams have interest in.

ITs better then telling the locker room its ok to shit all over the orginization, don't have to committ to the team, show uup whenever you want, you can still have your job. This is about committment to the TEAM, something Favre is totally lacking.

Favre has not been named the starter yet. He's only been welcomed back into camp, something they were gonna have to do anyway once Goodell approved Favre's reinstatement. Fucking chill.

[Pacopete4]

cpk1994 is not a packer fan so theres no reasoning with him.. its better off to just realize that and take his anus comments with a grain of salt

I am a Packer fan. I just cheer for the TEAM and not sniff jocks like you do.

Do I have to bring up your quotes that say you want us to lose if Brett is the QB?... come on now bud.. you're no packer fan

[Gunakor]

cpk1994 is not a packer fan so theres no reasoning with him.. its better off to just realize that and take his anus comments with a grain of salt

I am a Packer fan. I just cheer for the TEAM and not sniff jocks like you do.

It is still a TEAM if Favre is the starter. You have said if Favre is the starter you will not cheer for the TEAM. If the TEAM is what you will cheer for, why does it matter who is playing for it?

[Pacopete4]

I think Sherman won 3 nfc north titles didnt he?.. not to shabby, and not saying I like him either but you cant rip the guy too badly

the GM of the 4-12 team was TT wasn't it?


and I agree... this team is headed back to Siberia the moment Favre is gone from GB forever..

whoa, whoa, whoa... where in there did I say it was TT's fault? It was a question because if I remember right TT was the GM in Sherman's last season... so go fuck yourself once again Harv... such a douche

my bad there, I just saw the 4-12 statement.

No problem, I probably shoulda made myself more clear anyways..

[cpk1994]

Then he should have let him play for the VIkings. Grow a set and show that one player is not above the team and behavior like that will not be tolerated.

So your solution is to give into Favre's demands? I fail to see how that is growing a pair. I also don't see how it shows anyone anything other than how stupid of a GM you are to get nothing in return for a player on your roster that several teams have interest in.

ITs better then telling the locker room its ok to shit all over the orginization, don't have to committ to the team, show uup whenever you want, you can still have your job. This is about committment to the TEAM, something Favre is totally lacking.

Favre has not been named the starter yet. He's only been welcomed back into camp, something they were gonna have to do anyway once Goodell approved Favre's reinstatement. Fucking chill.

EDIT: putting rebuttal in proper place
Of couse he has't been. But by allowing an open competition McCarthy is already showing that his "team commitmment" mantra is complete BS.

[ND72]

cpk1994 is not a packer fan so theres no reasoning with him.. its better off to just realize that and take his anus comments with a grain of salt

I think he might be a Packer fan deep down, but his hatred of Favre trumps the love of the Packers. As in, it's more important to him to see Favre fail than it is to see the Packers succeed. Shame.

I wouldn't say he's not a packer fan, cause his "meaning" I agree with. I hate the fact that Favre has made himself bigger than the organization. Too many people are too in love with Brett Favre, and not the Packers. It drives me nuts listening ot people lately. At training camp I had 3 guys behind me trying to tell me how we will never win another game after Favre retires....EVER. I mean are you serious? That's just stupid.

[cpk1994]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?

[Gunakor]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Untrue. Rodgers is unrestricted when his contract expires. He'll have 5 years accrued service in teh NFL. He can sign with anyone he chooses and Green Bay has no way to stop him.

[Patler]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?

Every pro athlete knows that the only thing separating them from the second team or the waiver wire is their performance. Not commitments from the coach, general manger or anyone. Their performance.

[Patler]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?

Like most athletes, Rodgers probably will go where the biggest contract is.

[cpk1994]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?

Every pro athlete knows that the only thing separating them from the second team or the waiver wire is their performance. Not commitments from the coach, general manger or anyone. Their performance.

YOu might have merit if Rodgers was actually being given a shot to keep the job he was given.

[Patler]

YOu might have merit if Rodgers was actually being given a shot to keep the job he was given.

What makes you think he won't have?

[Gunakor]

Why would Rodgers be "gone"?

He is signed through the 2009 season and then is RFA, Packers have plenty of time with him.



Brohm was to be a first round pick as well, whats to say he won't be better?

Becuase Rodgers now has no incentive to stay. Why should Aaron believe what M3 says anymore as it has proven to be a sham?

Like most athletes, Rodgers probably will go where the biggest contract is.

I'd feel more comfortable with it if TT would just extend his contract now and give him what he'd be making as a starter this year even if he's the backup. Ordinarally I would not support a move like this, but seeing that Rodgers had been told by management that he'd be starting this year I only think it's fair if they pay him as if he were the starter even if Favre wins the job. It would do alot of help in keeping Rodgers happy, and would probably make him more accepting of one more year behind Favre.

[cpk1994]

YOu might have merit if Rodgers was actually being given a shot to keep the job he was given.

What makes you think he won't have?

Becuase McCarthy is a gutless coward.