If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :
"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"
I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:
1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.
So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.
This really isn't a prememptive strike as Paco and a few others alreday shouted out those 3 responses Saturday.
Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :
"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"
I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:
1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.
So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.
This really isn't a prememptive strike as Paco and a few others alreday shouted out those 3 responses Saturday.
I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again
This thread sucks
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
I thought this was settled Saturday; anyways great to bring it back up again
This thread sucks
That what I thought too.
The Brilliant Minds think alike once again
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
Geez, knee jerk is that it's got to be Fat Pat. He's been talking about Rodgers so much, you have to think other Packers are telling him 'Uh-oh, Aaron. I think Pat here's taken a liking to you.'
'course, and argument could be made for Urlacher
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
I guess so...the second paragraphs was so ridiculous i didn't think anybody would take it literally.
I guess it is another case of PT Barnum.
Really? And here I thought it was a rare moment of lucidity from our favorite crack smoking, high end appliance knowledgeable Packer following person of colour.
--
Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.
dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.
Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!!
Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.
I guess so...the second paragraphs was so ridiculous i didn't think anybody would take it literally.
I guess it is another case of PT Barnum.
Really? And here I thought it was a rare moment of lucidity from our favorite crack smoking, high end appliance knowledgeable Packer following person of colour.
Ty is a man of color.
Ty doesn't appreciate you bringing in the king's english into this thread.
Go see a flick and leave your flat you socialist bastard.
Ok, there are a few out there salivating in anticipation of the first Packer loss in which Rodgers does not play well.
They will immediately compose something like this :
"(1)Well, TT and MM supportesr/apologists/jocksniffers - your anointed boy stunk!
(2)Don't you wish you had Favre now?
(3) See! I'm a genius for wanting Favre!"
I thought I would make a preemptive strike response:
1. A young quarterback inevitably goes through an often rocky learning process. Favre certainly did. But it is better to grow and move forward over sticking with what you already know won't work.
2. No. Gladly take the growing pains - with potential championship upside - than watching another season come up short with an aging quarterback who began to think of himself as more important than his team.
3. Without question. Wishing to stick with something that hasn't worked in over a decade immediately identifies you as one.
So when the gleeful 'fans' emerge from under their rocks to fire off their diatribes after the Packers lose a game, this can be a quick, handy answer.
I was just thinking about this the other day....may I use these responses in a copy-paste fashion?
It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.
dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.
Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!!
Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.
Ty has been PCd.
well good; that means there's no need for me to do it too
TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER
It is exactly these kind of responses that are turning off me and a number of posters. You certainly have the right to disagree with somone but to resort with a "Fuck you" is just plain inappropriate.
dude, read the rest..it was clearly sarcasm.
Don't you mean..fuck you oregon...It was clearly sarcasm!!
Ty woulda...but has been implored by Mad and Zool to be nicer.
Ty has been PCd.
well good; that means there's no need for me to do it too
Comment