Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

NFC East - Best division in football

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

    Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

    2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
    Originally posted by 3irty1
    This is museum quality stupidity.

    Comment


    • #32
      Dallas O is lights out, though. And their D is dynamite, remember, we couldn't into the red zone unless they made a rare turnover!

      Eagles are a great team Zooly. Top 5 in the league when McNabb and Westbrook play.

      Giants
      Cowboys
      Eagles
      Redskins

      Stacked!

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Zool
        So now you make up stats? Not even last in the division.

        http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...=2008&season=2
        I definitely heard on ESPN before last weeks game they were ranked last in the league against the run. Also heard it on Packers pre-game on 620.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Zool
          As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

          Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

          2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
          Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
          They gave up 400 because they could not run.
          Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
          2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

          In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Dabaddestbear

            Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.
            Who did that?

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Dabaddestbear
              Originally posted by Zool
              As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

              Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

              2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
              Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
              They gave up 400 because they could not run.
              Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
              2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

              In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.
              We led in both games you fuck. Get your damn stats right if your going to try to come on this board and stir some shit, be clever and accurate about it or get the fuck out of here.

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by TheCheese
                Originally posted by Dabaddestbear
                Originally posted by Zool
                As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

                Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

                2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
                Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
                They gave up 400 because they could not run.
                Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
                2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

                In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.
                We led in both games you fuck. Get your damn stats right if your going to try to come on this board and stir some shit, be clever and accurate about it or get the fuck out of here.
                Good luck with that cheese. Bears fans throw out worthless stats. Apparently a 2-2 team is far superior to a 2-2 team. Stats be damned. When the Vikes beat the bears in a couple weeks, it will be attributed to Gus Ferrotte the amazing HOF calibur QB who has been misunderstood by 6 other teams including the Vikes in 2003 and 2004. He keeps getting cut because his talent is beyond recognition.

                He's no Kyle Orton, let me tell you.
                Originally posted by 3irty1
                This is museum quality stupidity.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Partial
                  Originally posted by Zool
                  So now you make up stats? Not even last in the division.

                  http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...=2008&season=2
                  I definitely heard on ESPN before last weeks game they were ranked last in the league against the run. Also heard it on Packers pre-game on 620.

                  I don't think they were ever last; but they are bad
                  TERD Buckley over Troy Vincent, Robert Ferguson over Chris Chambers, Kevn King instead of TJ Watt, and now, RICH GANNON, over JIMMY JIMMY JIMMY LEONARD. Thank you FLOWER

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Partial
                    Originally posted by Zool
                    So now you make up stats? Not even last in the division.

                    http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...=2008&season=2
                    I definitely heard on ESPN before last weeks game they were ranked last in the league against the run. Also heard it on Packers pre-game on 620.
                    looks like somebody got called on their bluff
                    And if you go look its not possible for us to be last in rush D because there are 3 teams below us that have played 1 less game than us Detroit has been on the bottum for the past few weeks

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Zool
                      Originally posted by TheCheese
                      Originally posted by Dabaddestbear
                      Originally posted by Zool
                      As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

                      Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

                      2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
                      Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
                      They gave up 400 because they could not run.
                      Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
                      2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

                      In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.
                      We led in both games you fuck. Get your damn stats right if your going to try to come on this board and stir some shit, be clever and accurate about it or get the fuck out of here.
                      Good luck with that cheese. Bears fans throw out worthless stats. Apparently a 2-2 team is far superior to a 2-2 team. Stats be damned. When the Vikes beat the bears in a couple weeks, it will be attributed to Gus Ferrotte the amazing HOF calibur QB who has been misunderstood by 6 other teams including the Vikes in 2003 and 2004. He keeps getting cut because his talent is beyond recognition.

                      He's no Kyle Orton, let me tell you.
                      That is so damn true. I got a couple of redneck Bears fan buddies who claim the Bears have been superior for years, just lacking a good QB. Well, my boss is real dumbass fair weather Chicago fan who is a ChiSox and Bears fan (and Cubs when they win) so just a dumbfuck (who also lost $50 last year saying Grossman would have a better QB rating then Favre at the end of 2007...easy money from that bitch) saying Orton is the difference as he won't lose games. Last I checked I doubt any team in the league would give up a healthy QB starter for that shitpile of a ball-hander-offer to your rookie RB.

                      The newest Bear thing I've heard from several is Orton is a winner (meaning he is above .500 as a starter with good D teams) yet he will shift the power in the division. Granted if Arod is out, I'd rather have Orton as our starter than the shaky rooks we got, but hey at least we got playmakers with DD and esp. Jennings so maybe Flynn can throw up a lucky bomb. When the fuck was the last time the Bears had a QB, WR or TE as receiving or throwing threats go the Pro Bowl? What the fuck happened to G. Olsen? Where is he? Grossman don't count either as he was never a true Pro Bowler only a Bone Boweler.

                      [/b]
                      Snake's Twitter comments would be LEGENDARY.........if I was ugly or gave a shit about Twitter.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Charles Woodson
                        Originally posted by Partial
                        Originally posted by Zool
                        So now you make up stats? Not even last in the division.

                        http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/statis...=2008&season=2
                        I definitely heard on ESPN before last weeks game they were ranked last in the league against the run. Also heard it on Packers pre-game on 620.
                        looks like somebody got called on their bluff
                        And if you go look its not possible for us to be last in rush D because there are 3 teams below us that have played 1 less game than us Detroit has been on the bottum for the past few weeks
                        Not really. I said what I heard, and where I heard it. Regardless, one cannot deny how beyond awful the run defense has been.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          My iggles are last in the NFC East. This does not please me. That team is as good as anyone in the NFC and can beat anybody, any given sunday. They're certainly better than any NFC North, or West team.

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Partial
                            My iggles are last in the NFC East. This does not please me. That team is as good as anyone in the NFC and can beat anybody, any given sunday. They're certainly better than any NFC North, or West team.
                            Well they didnt beat the Bears.
                            Or maybe you thought they played them in the preseason?

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Originally posted by th87
                              Originally posted by Dabaddestbear

                              Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.
                              Who did that?
                              The Packers. ---But lets now make that three games. And I don't mean a lead for one possession, only to watch a team come right back and walk you down the field for another score.
                              Each game the Packers lost, they start off losing--- and lose. Comeback Favre is no longer in the equation for you guys.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Originally posted by TheCheese
                                Originally posted by Dabaddestbear
                                Originally posted by Zool
                                As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

                                Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

                                2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.
                                Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
                                They gave up 400 because they could not run.
                                Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
                                2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

                                In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.
                                We led in both games you fuck. Get your damn stats right if your going to try to come on this board and stir some shit, be clever and accurate about it or get the fuck out of here.
                                Aww shut up and get your panties out a bunch. THEY LOST THEM ALL.
                                A lead that last for all of 4 minutes of the game means nothing. I dont have to stir things up on here, a 3 game losing streak has a way of doing that for me.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X