NFC East - Best division in football

[Dabaddestbear]

As stated funbags, the Eagles D got absolutely rocked by the Cowboys. They arent that tough. If your team can pick up a blitz the Eagles are very beatable.

Bears gave up over 400 yards passing to Brian Griese? Those not-so-good Vikings almost beat the Colts that you apparently are taking pride in beating.

2-2 = 2-2 if im not mistaken.

Eagles D getting rocked by the Cowboys? They have T.O. and a passing game that will rock anyone when they are clicking....(Ask the Packers, they saw it first hand..lol)
They gave up 400 because they could not run.
Almost NEVER shows up in a win lost column.
2-2 today. Lost two games in the last minutes of the fourth quarter. Those lapses can be corrected. Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

In about 3 more weeks one team will be shown to be on the steady rise, while the other will be looking to find ways to stop the skidding back down to the cellar.

We led in both games you fuck. Get your damn stats right if your going to try to come on this board and stir some shit, be clever and accurate about it or get the fuck out of here.

Good luck with that cheese. Bears fans throw out worthless stats. Apparently a 2-2 team is far superior to a 2-2 team. Stats be damned. When the Vikes beat the bears in a couple weeks, it will be attributed to Gus Ferrotte the amazing HOF calibur QB who has been misunderstood by 6 other teams including the Vikes in 2003 and 2004. He keeps getting cut because his talent is beyond recognition.

He's no Kyle Orton, let me tell you.

No, Kyle Orton knows how to win a game with less talented WR's...lol.

[Zool]

No, Kyle Orton knows how to win a game with less talented WR's...lol.

Enough of your trollation. Last year you would have sworn that Berrian was the best WR in football if anyone asked.

[Dabaddestbear]

No, Kyle Orton knows how to win a game with less talented WR's...lol.

Enough of your trollation. Last year you would have sworn that Berrian was the best WR in football if anyone asked.

Uh, I have never have and never will. Stop assuming what I would have said in the past instead of what I have always said.
I have always questioned the talent of the Bears WR. And I still do today until they become more consistent. Actually that is the only spot I give the Packers over the Bears is at the WR position.

Now back to the Facts....

[Scott Campbell]

.....I have always questioned the talent of the Bears WR............

Whoops. Caught again.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject:

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?p=155533&highlight=#155533

.................. and The WR corp is better and deeper than last year. ........

[Dabaddestbear]

.....I have always questioned the talent of the Bears WR............

Whoops. Caught again.


PostPosted: Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:20 pm Post subject:

http://www.packerrats.com/ratchat/viewtopic.php?p=155533&highlight=#155533

.................. and The WR corp is better and deeper than last year. ........

Are you serious?lol-- I cant stop laughing at your attempts to debunk me on here.
I said they were better than the year before and deeper. NEVER have I ever said they were tops in anything. Just a better crop than the Bears WR's prior to the year before.
I love winning, especially when its against you. It's so easy.
Next!

[Scott Campbell]

NEVER have I ever said they were tops in anything.

Is it that hard to read your own quote.

.....I have always questioned the talent of the Bears WR............

The boys home must have real high standards if they hire retards.

[Dabaddestbear]

NEVER have I ever said they were tops in anything.

Is it that hard to read your own quote.

.....I have always questioned the talent of the Bears WR............

The boys home must have real high standards if they hire retards.

Better yet, the MPS system. Because thats where I work now. Yep, teaching young men and women on Sundays who to watch when you want to see a winner. You see they were all ready to all go and smoke crack after watching loss after loss, until I explained to them that they dont have to put up with watching such garbage play calling and defense. Just tune in to the Bears and then your Sundays could be a lot more brighter...
Now they are all drug free and happy. Due to the Bears recent wins.
So cheer for the Bears, they keep our kids off crack.

[Scott Campbell]

Yep, teaching young men and woman on Sundays who to watch win you want to see a winner.

God help em if you teach English.

[Dabaddestbear]

Yep, teaching young men and woman on Sundays who to watch win you want to see a winner.

God help em if you teach English.

\
Nice job of shifting letters.
But its ok.

[Scott Campbell]

Nice job of shifting letters.

What a weasel. Can't you man up to anything? Don't you realize your edits get posted.



Last edited by Dabaddestbear on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:09 am; edited 2 times in total

[th87]

Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

Who did that?

The Packers. ---But lets now make that three games. And I don't mean a lead for one possession, only to watch a team come right back and walk you down the field for another score.
Each game the Packers lost, they start off losing--- and lose. Comeback Favre is no longer in the equation for you guys.

Sorry homeboy. "Never having a lead" means never having a lead. And the Packers have had leads in those two games.

Of course you clearly know this, since you're hurting your legs by backpedaling and adding the "for one possession" loophole.

Just another inaccuracy in your bevy of inaccuracies.

[th87]

Nice job of shifting letters.

What a weasel. Can't you man up to anything? Don't you realize your edits get posted.



Last edited by Dabaddestbear on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:09 am; edited 2 times in total

Busted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3N8Yar4NgI

[Dabaddestbear]

Never having a lead in 2 games lost back to back is another story.

Who did that?

The Packers. ---But lets now make that three games. And I don't mean a lead for one possession, only to watch a team come right back and walk you down the field for another score.
Each game the Packers lost, they start off losing--- and lose. Comeback Favre is no longer in the equation for you guys.

Sorry homeboy. "Never having a lead" means never having a lead. And the Packers have had leads in those two games.

Of course you clearly know this, since you're hurting your legs by backpedaling and adding the "for one possession" loophole.

Just another inaccuracy in your bevy of inaccuracies.

Ha! Who cares about a loop hole. And I cant believe you took the bait to actually argue if they had the lead for a few minutes...lol.
THEY LOST! and not only that, they have LOST 3 STRAIGHT! That means that must learn how to win.
But like I have said in previous post, they have a good chance against Seattle cuz they just suck real bad this year and Hasselbeck has a bad knee making him a sitting duck if he cant be mobile against the DE's rushing off the ends.

[Scott Campbell]

Nice job of shifting letters.

What a weasel. Can't you man up to anything? Don't you realize your edits get posted.



Last edited by Dabaddestbear on Tue Oct 07, 2008 1:09 am; edited 2 times in total

Busted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3N8Yar4NgI

And I think it speaks volumes about his character - or lack thereof.

[Scott Campbell]

Ha! Who cares about a loop hole.

Now you're finding out why they say - those who can, do...........